Literature DB >> 26461054

Major histocompatibility complex class I expression impacts on patient survival and type and density of immune cells in biliary tract cancer.

Benjamin Goeppert1, Lena Frauenschuh1, Manuela Zucknick2, Stephanie Roessler1, Arianeb Mehrabi3, Mohammadreza Hafezi3, Albrecht Stenzinger1, Arne Warth1, Anita Pathil4, Marcus Renner1, Peter Schirmacher1, Wilko Weichert1,5,6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare malignant tumours with a poor prognosis. Previously, we have presented a detailed characterisation of the inflammatory infiltrate in BTC. Here, we analysed the impact of the expression of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) on patient survival and the quantity, as well as the quality of tumour-infiltrating immune cell types in BTC.
METHODS: MHC I expression was assessed semi-quantitatively in 334 BTC, including extrahepatic (n=129) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (n=146), as well as adenocarcinomas of the gallbladder (n=59). In addition, 71 high-grade biliary intraepithelial lesions (BilIN 3) were included. Results were correlated with data on antitumour inflammation and investigated with respect to their association with clinicopathological variables and patient survival.
RESULTS: BTC showed a wide spectrum of different MHC I expression patterns ranging from complete negativity in some tumours to strong homogenous expression in others. In BilIN 3, significantly higher MHC I expression levels were seen compared to invasive tumours (P=0.004). Patients with strong tumoural MHC I expression had a significantly higher overall survival probability (median survival benefit: 8 months; P=0.006). MHC I expression strongly correlated with the number of tumour-infiltrating T-lymphocytes (CD4(+) and CD8(+)) and macrophages.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences of MHC I expression predict patient outcome and show correlations with specific components of the inflammatory infiltrate in BTC. These findings contribute to a better understanding of immune response and immune escape phenomena in cholangiocarcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26461054      PMCID: PMC4815783          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a diverse group of tumours that can be classified into three major subtypes: cholangiocarcinomas of intrahepatic (ICC) and extrahepatic (ECC) origin and adenocarcinomas of the gallbladder (GBAC). For BTC patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease, the prognosis is poor with a median survival of <1 year (Hezel ). Common therapeutic options include surgery and chemotherapy, but because BTC patients often present with advanced disease not amenable to surgery and current chemotherapeutic regimens are rather ineffective, novel treatment options are of paramount importance (Patel, 2011). Tumour cells are often surrounded by infiltrating inflammatory cells, particularly lymphocytes and macrophages (Smyth ) and there is compelling evidence that tumour-infiltrating T-lymphocytes have a favourable effect on patient survival in several malignant tumours, including colorectal (Galon ; Mlecnik ), ovarian (Zhang ), breast (Mahmoud ) and pancreatic (Fukunaga ) cancer. By investigating a large cohort of BTC, we were able to show a favourable prognostic effect of tumour-infiltrating T-lymphocytes in ECC and GBAC, but not in ICC (Goeppert ). Tumour antigens drive the development of tumour-specific adaptive immune responses (Boon ). Specifically, CD8+ T-lymphocytes attack tumour cells presenting tumour-associated antigen peptides via major histocompatibility complex type I (MHC I) molecules on their surface by producing interferon gamma. Interferon gamma-dependent mechanisms of tumour cell cytostasis and killing comprise cell cycle inhibition, apoptosis, angiostasis and induction of antitumourigenic activity of macrophages (Dunn ). MHC I molecules are constitutively expressed on normal epithelial cells. Changes of MHC I expression are often observed in tumours and downregulation of MHC I has been described as a frequent feature in various tumour types, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Ryschich ; Rodriguez ; Campoli and Ferrone, 2008; Du and Wang, 2011). In the neoplastic setting, MHC I is regarded to exert a central role in the regulation of CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte recognition of carcinoma-specific antigens, and loss of MHC I expression has been suggested as one major escape pathway for the evasion of CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte surveillance. In several tumour types, including colorectal cancer, it has been reported by others and us that downregulation of MHC I expression is more frequently observed in metastatic stages and poorly differentiated tumours (Kasajima ; Du and Wang, 2011). As the role of MHC I in cholangiocarcinogenesis has not yet been examined systematically, we focused in this study on the impact of MHC I expression on quantity and quality of the tumour-infiltrating immune cell infiltrate, as well as on associations of MHC I expression with patient survival in BTC. This approach extends our current knowledge of the interaction between the immune system and BTC, and provides a solid translational resource for both future functional studies and clinical trials.

Materials and methods

Clinicopathological characteristics of BTC patients

Tissue samples from 334 patients (median age: 64.2 years) who underwent bile duct and/or liver surgery at the University Hospital Heidelberg between 1995 and 2010 were included in our cohort. Only patients with primary adenocarcinomas of the biliary tract and without other known malignancies at the time of diagnosis were included. Our BTC cohort comprised of 129 ECC (93 perihilar and 36 distal), 146 ICC and 59 GBAC. In addition, 71 high-grade intraepithelial lesions (BilIN 3) were included; 59 of these were corresponding to invasive BTC samples of our cohort. Patients who received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy were excluded. Survival data was available for 302 patients (Supplementary Table 1). Tumours were restaged according to the 7th TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours and classified after the World Health Organization tumour classification system (Bosman ). Clinicopathological data of the complete BTC study cohort are provided in Table 1. Clinicopathological data stratified for the BTC subtypes are provided in Supplementary Tables 2–4. The use of the tissue for this study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (206/05).
Table 1

MHC I expression in BTC stratified by clinicopathological parameters

 Number (%)MHC IMHC IP-value
  IRS 06 (number (%))IRS 812 (number (%))χ2 test
All cases334 (100)175 (52.4)159 (47.6) 
Age
64–92 years169 (50.6)90 (53.3)79 (46.7)0.835
31–64 years165 (49.4)85 (51.5)80 (48.5) 
Sex
Male163 (48.8)78 (47.9%)85 (52.1)0.13
Female171 (51.2)97 (56.7%)74 (43.3) 
BTC subgroups
ICC146 (43.7)85 (58.2)61 (41.8)0.118
ECC129 (38.6)59 (45.7)70 (54.3) 
GBAC59 (17.7)31 (52.5)28 (47.5) 
Histology subgroups
Ductal274 (82)146 (53.3)128 (46.7)0.187
Papillary22 (6.6)8 (36.4)14 (63.6) 
Mucinous8 (2.4)3 (37.5)5 (62.5) 
Intestinal10 (3)4 (40)6 (60) 
Other20 (6)14 (70)6 (30) 
UICC stage
138 (14.2)15 (39.5)23 (60.5)0.074
267 (25.1)32 (47.8)35 (52.2) 
371 (26.6)33 (46.5)38 (53.5) 
491 (34.1)56 (61.5)35 (38.5) 
pT
T173 (21.9)40 (54.8)33 (45.2)0.474
T2131 (39.2)62 (47.3)69 (52.7) 
T3103 (30.8)59 (57.3)44 (42.7) 
T427 (8.1)14 (51.9)13 (48.1) 
pN
N0118 (45.6)53 (44.9)65 (55.1)0.153
N1141 (54.4)77 (54.6)64 (45.4) 
M
M0315 (94.3)161 (51.1)154 (48.9)0.094
M119 (5.7)14 (73.7)5 (26.3) 
G
G118 (5.4)5 (27.8)13 (72.2)0.05
G2228 (68.3)118 (51.8)110 (48.2) 
G388 (26.3)52 (59.1)36 (40.9) 
L
L0154 (46.1)76 (49.4)78 (50.6)0.357
L1180 (53.9)99 (55)81 (45) 
V
V0238 (71.3)118 (49.6)120 (50.4)0.133
V196 (28.7)57 (59.4)39 (40.6) 
Pn
Pn0268 (80.2)144 (53.7)124 (46.3)0.397
Pn166 (19.8)31 (47)35 (53) 

Abbreviations: BTC=biliary tract cancer; ECC=extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; GBAC=adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder; ICC=intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; IRS=immunoreactive score; MHC I=major histocompatibility complex class I; UICC=Union for International Cancer Control.

P-values were calculated by χ2 test.

Tissue microarray construction

From all 334 BTC, 3μm sections were cut and stained with H&E. Representative areas from the tumour center and invasive margins were marked by two pathologists with a special expertise in BTC pathology (BG and WW). For each case, tumour tissue cores (1.5 mm diameter) from the selected representative tumour areas were punched out of the sample tissue blocks and embedded into a new paraffin array block using a tissue microarrayer (Beecher Instruments, Woodland, CA, USA).

Immunohistochemistry and tissue microarray evaluation

For the detection of MHC I, a monoclonal mouse IgG antibody directed against MHC I (clone number EMR8-5; dilution 1 : 5000; MBL, Nagoya, Japan) was used. This antibody detects human HLA class I (HLA-A, -B or -C). Staining was performed on an automated system (Discovery Ultra, Ventana, Tuscon, AZ, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. MHC I antigen expression was scored by applying a semi-quantitative immunoreactive score (IRS) resulting in expression values ranging from 0 (no expression) to 12 (strong expression in more than 80% of tumour cells), as previously described (Goeppert ). Briefly, staining intensity (0: no staining, 1: weak staining, 2: moderate staining, 3: strong staining), as well as percentage of immunostained cells (0: no cells stained, 1: <10% of cells stained, 2: 10–50% of cells stained, 3: 51–80% of cells stained, 4: >80% of cells stained) are scored separately and the IRS for each individual case is calculated by multiplication of the intensity and the percentage score. Immunohistochemistry to detect and count specific inflammatory cells (CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, CD117, Ki-67) was performed as recently described (Goeppert ). For technical reasons, some tissue microarray dots could not be evaluated (e.g. loss of tissue, staining artifacts). Therefore, the number of included cases for the analysis of MHC I expression and for the different immune cell types is slightly different.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed with the statistical computing environment R version 3.1 and IBM SPSS STATISTICS version 19 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Spearman's rank order correlation was used to determine whether there was a positive or negative correlation between the degrees of tumour-infiltrating immune cells and proliferative activity. The significance of differences in the density of immune cells for differing tumour stages and other clinicopathological variables was assessed by Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test and χ2 test as indicated. Statistically significant trends associated with increasing UICC stages, tumour grades or T-stages were identified by Jonkheere–Terpstra and Cochran–Armitage trend test, respectively. Univariate survival analysis was performed for overall survival by calculating Kaplan–Meier curves. Significance of differences between the groups was assessed using log-rank test. For multivariate analysis, concordance regression was applied, representing a generalisation of Cox proportional hazards regression, which is robust to violations of the proportional hazards assumption. Test results with P-values ⩽0.05 were considered statistically significant. All tests were two-sided.

Results

MHC I expression in BTC, BTC subtypes and in intraepithelial neoplastic lesions

MHC I immunohistochemistry showed a cytoplasmic and pronounced membranous staining pattern in tumour cells, stromal cells and immune cells; nuclear staining was not observed. BTC exhibited a wide spectrum of MHC I expression ranging from strong positivity in >80% of tumour cells (IRS=12) to complete negativity in all tumour cells (IRS=0). Representative pictures are shown in Figure 1. On the basis of this continuum of different MHC I expression patterns, tumours could be divided into two distinct expression groups: 47.6% (n=159) of tumours showed high (IRS=8–12) MHC I expression and 52.4% (n=175) showed low (IRS=0–6) MHC I expression (Table 1). In addition, we applied a three-tier grouping algorithm, in which 19.2% of cases (n=64) displayed strong (IRS=9–12), 43.7% of cases (n=146) moderate (IRS=6–8) and 37.1% of cases (n=124) weak (IRS=0–4) MHC I expression. Differences in MHC I expression between the BTC subtypes were not observed (Supplementary Figure 1). Overall, intraepithelial neoplastic lesions (BilIN 3) showed significantly higher MHC I expression compared to invasive BTC (P=0.004; Figure 2) with 67.6% (n=48) of BilIN 3 samples displaying high (IRS=8–12) MHC I expression and only 32.4% (n=23) low (IRS=0–6) MHC I expression. A matched-pair analysis (n=56) of MHC I expression in BilIN 3 lesions directly compared with the respective corresponding invasive BTC confirmed the loss of MHC I in the evolution of an intraepithelial into an invasive neoplastic lesion. However, here the loss was only borderline significant, possibly because of the lower sample size (P=0.066; Supplementary Figure 2). Additionally evaluated samples of non-neoplastic biliary tract epithelia showed a higher MHC I expression compared to BilIN 3 lesions (data not shown).
Figure 1

MHC I expression in BTC. Representative pictures of (A) strong MHC I expression and (B) weak MHC I expression in perihilar ECCs (original magnification: 50 × ; inlet 200 ×).

Figure 2

MHC I expression in pre-invasive intraepithelial neoplastic lesions (BilIN 3) compared with invasive BTC. P-value calculated by Mann–Whitney U-test.

Association of MHC I expression on tumour cells with clinicopathological variables in BTC

Analysis of MHC I expression with clinicopathological data revealed a trend for higher MHC I expression in lower UICC stages (P=0.074; Table 1). Furthermore, a significant association of high MHC I expression and low tumour grade could be observed (P=0.05; Table 1). Other clinicopathological variables did not show an association with MHC I expression (Table 1).

Correlation of MHC I expression on tumour cells with the density of tumour-infiltrating immune cells in BTC

Next, we investigated the association between MHC I expression on tumour cells and the density of specific immune cell types in the same cohort. We found that MHC I expression was associated with the number of tumour-infiltrating immune cells (Figures 3 and 4). However, the statistical strength of correlations varied. Correlation was strongest for CD68+ macrophages followed by CD8+ T-lymphocytes and CD4+ T-lymphocytes, whereas correlation with the density of CD20+ B-cells was only weak (Figure 4). In addition, MHC I expression did not correlate with the proliferation rate (number of Ki-67 positive tumour cells in percent) in BTC.
Figure 3

Correlation between inflammatory cells and MHC I expression in BTC. Y-axis: (A) CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts, (B) CD8+ T-lymphocyte counts, (C) CD20+ B-cell counts, (D) CD68+ macrophage counts. X-axis: MHC I expression. IRS=immunoreactive score.

Figure 4

Spearman's rank correlation ρ between density of inflammatory cell types, proliferation index (Ki-67) and MHC I expression in BTC. Levels of grey represent strength of correlation, with dark grey tones showing a high degree of association. In each square, there are three values given: top=ρ, middle=P-value, bottom=sample size.

We then analysed the association of tumour-infiltrating immune cells and MHC I expression separately for the BTC subtypes. Thereby, we found that the associations between inflammatory infiltrates and MHC I expression observed in the whole cohort (see above) were also evident in ECC, whereas in ICC, MHC I expression was correlated significantly only with the number of tumour-infiltrating CD8+ T-lymphocytes; in GBAC, a significant correlation of MHC I expression was only seen for CD68+ macrophages (Supplementary Figures 3–5).

MHC I expression on tumour cells is an independent prognosticator of overall survival in BTC patients

Classical survival prognosticators such as UICC-stage proved to have high prognostic impact in our BTC cohort (Supplementary Table 1). Higher MHC I expression on tumour cells was also significantly associated with longer overall survival in BTC patients (P=0.029 and P=0.006, respectively; Figure 5). Although patients with low MHC I expression had a median survival of 20.01 months in our BTC cohort, patients exhibiting strong MHC I expression had an improved median overall survival of 28.06 months (P=0.006). Multivariate analysis under inclusion of UICC-stage revealed a significant independent prognostic impact of MHC I expression in BTC (HR: 0.631, P=0.02; Table 2). Analysis of BTC subtypes showed that the prognostic significance of MHC I expression on tumour cells is by trend stronger in ECC and GBAC compared with ICC (Supplementary Figure 6).
Figure 5

Overall survival probability in BTC patients stratified for MHC I expression. Kaplan–Meier curves depict overall survival probability stratified according to either (A) a three-tier classification or (B) a two-tier classification of MHC I expression. P-values were calculated by log-rank test.

Table 2

Results of multivariate survival analysis under inclusion of MHC I expression and UICC-stage as exploratory factors for overall survival in BTC

 HRLower CI (95%)Upper CI (95%)P-value
MHC weak (IRS 0–4)1   
MHC moderate (IRS 6–8)0.8750.6411.1950.4
MHC strong (IRS 9–12)0.6610.4420.9890.04
UICC 11   
UICC 20.9710.5841.6120.9
UICC 31.731.0852.7590.02
UICC 42.3981.4953.847<0.001
Total (n=302)    

Abbreviations: BTC=biliary tract cancer; CI=confidence interval; HR= hazard ratio; IRS=immunoreactive score; MHC I=major histocompatibility complex class I; UICC=Union for International Cancer Control.

P-values for testing the statistical significance of individual factors were calculated by Wald test.

Discussion

In this study, we provide a comprehensive analysis of MHC I expression patterns in BTC. We used a previously described, large and well-characterized BTC cohort and could thereby correlate MHC I expression on tumour cells with the amount of specific cells of the tumour-infiltrating inflammatory infiltrate and patient prognosis. A variety of functional data demonstrated that in the course of carcinogenesis neoplasms are able to acquire the ability to evade an activation of the adaptive immune response (Dunn ; Rabinovich ). This issue has been studied extensively in a variety of human cancers, including breast, prostate, pancreatic, oesophagus and colorectal cancer (Du and Wang, 2011; Scott ). Concerning biliary malignancies and immune escape mechanisms, however, the number of available studies is limited (Que ; Shimonishi ; Norris ). One major mechanism of immune escape is downregulation of MHC I antigen on cancer cells which can take place as a consequence of a number of different molecular alterations (Seliger, 2008, 2012). Multiple molecular mechanisms, including epigenetic alterations, have been described as being responsible for MHC I downregulation (Koopman ; Nie ; Goeppert ) and altered MHC I phenotypes have been described (Garrido ; Cabrera ). Downregulation of MHC I expression on cancer cells has been demonstrated in a variety of human malignancies and mostly, but not exclusively, had a negative impact on patient survival (Natali ; Facoetti ; Meissner ; Ogino ; Han ; Kasajima ; Du and Wang, 2011). In line with these studies, we here demonstrated that reduced MHC I expression in BTC is linked to shortened overall survival probability of patients. Based on our current and previous data focusing on BTC subtypes, we hypothesise that in ICC interactions between tumour cells and immune system do not appear to strictly follow the classical pattern. On the one hand, no specific immune cell type was associated with an improved overall survival in ICC (Goeppert ); on the other hand, MHC I expression in ICC exhibited less prognostic impact compared with ECC and GBAC. Accordingly, alternative mechanisms might play a more important role in the tumour-immune system interaction in ICC. These alternative mechanisms might include aberrant regulation of other factors of the antigen-processing machinery, or other potential mechanisms of tumour immune escape, such as Fas-mediated apoptosis of immune cells. In accordance with this, one study showed in ICC upregulation of FasL at early stages and downregulation of FasL at progressed stages, thereby indicating a potential role of this immune escape mechanism in cholangiocarcinogenesis (Shimonishi ). Interestingly, in vitro experiments showed that primary and malignant cholangiocytes undergo CD40-mediated Fas-dependent apoptosis, but are insensitive to direct activation with exogenous FasL (Humphreys ). Taken together, the current data suggest that ICC is less sensitive to immune cell-mediated antitumour effects than ECC and GBAC. In this study, we also investigated MHC I expression in pre-invasive BilIN 3 and found higher expression levels compared with invasive BTC. Noteworthy, already BilIN 3 showed a downregulation of MHC I expression compared to non-neoplastic biliary tract epithelia. A decrease of MHC I expression in tumour-adjacent normal mucosa and in non-invasive intraepithelial neoplastic lesions has been previously noted in other cancer types (Kaklamanis ; Tsioulias , 1993; Grandis ). These data imply that in a variety of tumours loss of MHC I expression can act as an early onset mechanism of tumour immune escape, which might be effective in BTC as well. In addition, the prevalence of reversible (soft) and/or irreversible (hard) MHC I alterations has been proposed to have a major impact on the ability of T-lymphocytes to destroy malignant cells (Garrido ). However, in this study we have not investigated specific mechanisms by which MHC I downregulation may be triggered in BTC. We observed that MHC I expression on tumour cells is not only correlated with the number of tumour-infiltrating T-lymphocytes, but also with the amount of tumour-infiltrating macrophages. This interesting finding highlights the recently widely acknowledged importance of macrophages in the tumour-immune system interaction. However, in our experimental setting it is only speculative whether macrophages are attracted by chemokines produced by T-lymphoctes or vice versa. The exact mechanisms that may underlie this association remain to be addressed in future functional studies. Nevertheless, macrophages may also play an important role in the tumour-immune system interaction in BTC, as it has been shown for other cancer types (Shimura ; Kawai ). However, intratumoural macrophage count was not associated with significant differences in overall survival in BTC (Goeppert ) which indicates that macrophage density per se might not be of utmost importance in the antitumour immune response in this tumour type. Recently, immune response-modulating targeted therapies have been very successfully tested as anticancer agents in a variety of human tumours. The first substance in this regard was Ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4). Ipilimumab has been approved for therapy in malignant melanoma (Weber ) and is under evaluation in a broad variety of other solid neoplasms (Kirkwood ). Recently, several other even more promising- drugs, which block programmed death 1 protein (PD-1) and one of its ligands programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) have also been tested with respect to their antitumour activity and have been or will be approved for therapy in a variety of solid tumours, including non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma (Brahmer ; Errico, 2015; Garon ; Larkin ). Consequently, the clinical effects of these drugs are now explored in other tumour entities as well. It is conceivable to speculate that the pre-existing density of inflammatory cells and the expression levels of MHC I on tumour cells might be connected to the response to immune modulation drugs. In conclusion, we here report that MHC I expression in BTC is correlated with type and density of tumour-infiltrating immune cells. Furthermore, the loss of MHC I expression in tumour cells is associated with shortened overall survival in BTC patients. The respective associations were specifically strong in ECC, but considerably weaker in ICC, thereby pointing towards potentially therapy-relevant differences in immune escape mechanisms between BTC subtypes. These data provide a solid basis for a better understanding of the biological role of the regulation of antitumour inflammation in BTC, as well as for future functional and clinical studies investigating the modulation of the inflammatory response for the benefit of BTC patients.
  48 in total

Review 1.  Novel insights into the molecular mechanisms of HLA class I abnormalities.

Authors:  Barbara Seliger
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 2.  Cholangiocarcinoma--controversies and challenges.

Authors:  Tushar Patel
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes predict clinical outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sahar M A Mahmoud; Emma Claire Paish; Desmond G Powe; R Douglas Macmillan; Matthew J Grainge; Andrew H S Lee; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Antibody therapy of cancer.

Authors:  Andrew M Scott; Jedd D Wolchok; Lloyd J Old
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward B Garon; Naiyer A Rizvi; Rina Hui; Natasha Leighl; Ani S Balmanoukian; Joseph Paul Eder; Amita Patnaik; Charu Aggarwal; Matthew Gubens; Leora Horn; Enric Carcereny; Myung-Ju Ahn; Enriqueta Felip; Jong-Seok Lee; Matthew D Hellmann; Omid Hamid; Jonathan W Goldman; Jean-Charles Soria; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Ruth Z Rutledge; Jin Zhang; Jared K Lunceford; Reshma Rangwala; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Charlotte Roach; Kenneth Emancipator; Leena Gandhi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Global alterations of DNA methylation in cholangiocarcinoma target the Wnt signaling pathway.

Authors:  Benjamin Goeppert; Carolin Konermann; Christopher Roman Schmidt; Olga Bogatyrova; Lea Geiselhart; Christina Ernst; Lei Gu; Natalia Becker; Manuela Zucknick; Arianeb Mehrabi; Mohammadreza Hafezi; Frederick Klauschen; Albrecht Stenzinger; Arne Warth; Kai Breuhahn; Marcus Renner; Wilko Weichert; Peter Schirmacher; Christoph Plass; Dieter Weichenhan
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Julie Brahmer; Karen L Reckamp; Paul Baas; Lucio Crinò; Wilfried E E Eberhardt; Elena Poddubskaya; Scott Antonia; Adam Pluzanski; Everett E Vokes; Esther Holgado; David Waterhouse; Neal Ready; Justin Gainor; Osvaldo Arén Frontera; Libor Havel; Martin Steins; Marina C Garassino; Joachim G Aerts; Manuel Domine; Luis Paz-Ares; Martin Reck; Christine Baudelet; Christopher T Harbison; Brian Lestini; David R Spigel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Histopathologic-based prognostic factors of colorectal cancers are associated with the state of the local immune reaction.

Authors:  Bernhard Mlecnik; Marie Tosolini; Amos Kirilovsky; Anne Berger; Gabriela Bindea; Tchao Meatchi; Patrick Bruneval; Zlatko Trajanoski; Wolf-Herman Fridman; Franck Pagès; Jérôme Galon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Immunotherapy of cancer in 2012.

Authors:  John M Kirkwood; Lisa H Butterfield; Ahmad A Tarhini; Hassane Zarour; Pawel Kalinski; Soldano Ferrone
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Prognostic impact of tumour-infiltrating immune cells on biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  B Goeppert; L Frauenschuh; M Zucknick; A Stenzinger; M Andrulis; F Klauschen; K Joehrens; A Warth; M Renner; A Mehrabi; M Hafezi; A Thelen; P Schirmacher; W Weichert
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  The case for immune-based approaches in biliary tract carcinoma.

Authors:  Austin G Duffy; Oxana V Makarova-Rusher; Tim F Greten
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 2.  [Biliary tract cancers : Molecular characterization and identification of novel prognostic markers].

Authors:  B Goeppert
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 3.  Immune suppressive checkpoint interactions in the tumour microenvironment of primary liver cancers.

Authors:  Guoying Zhou; Patrick P C Boor; Marco J Bruno; Dave Sprengers; Jaap Kwekkeboom
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 9.075

4.  Spatiotemporal analysis of tumour-infiltrating immune cells in biliary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Stephanie Roessler; Benjamin Goeppert; Alphonse Charbel; Luca Tavernar; Thomas Albrecht; Fritz Brinkmann; Joanne Verheij; Eva Roos; Monika Nadja Vogel; Bruno Köhler; Christoph Springfeld; Alexander Brobeil; Peter Schirmacher; Stephan Singer; Arianeb Mehrabi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 9.075

5.  PD-L1 expression on immune cells, but not on tumor cells, is a favorable prognostic factor for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Lavinia Patricia Mocan; Rares Craciun; Cristiana Grapa; Carmen Stanca Melincovici; Ioana Rusu; Nadim Al Hajjar; Zeno Sparchez; Daniel Leucuta; Maria Ilies; Mihaela Sparchez; Tudor Mocan; Carmen Mihaela Mihu
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 6.630

Review 6.  Engineering universal cells that evade immune detection.

Authors:  Robert Lanza; David W Russell; Andras Nagy
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 7.  The Emerging Role of Immunotherapy in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Oraianthi Fiste; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos; Maria Gavriatopoulou; Michalis Liontos; Konstantinos Koutsoukos; Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos; Flora Zagouri
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22

8.  MHC Intratumoral Heterogeneity May Predict Cancer Progression and Response to Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Irene Romero; Cristina Garrido; Ignacio Algarra; Virginia Chamorro; Antonia Collado; Federico Garrido; Angel M Garcia-Lora
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Successful immune checkpoint blockade in a patient with advanced stage microsatellite-unstable biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Elena Czink; Matthias Kloor; Benjamin Goeppert; Stefan Fröhling; Sebastian Uhrig; Tim F Weber; Jörn Meinel; Christian Sutter; Karl Heinz Weiss; Peter Schirmacher; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz; Dirk Jäger; Christoph Springfeld
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2017-09-01

10.  Characterisation of the immune-related transcriptome in resected biliary tract cancers.

Authors:  Michele Ghidini; Luciano Cascione; Pietro Carotenuto; Andrea Lampis; Francesco Trevisani; Maria Chiara Previdi; Jens C Hahne; Ian Said-Huntingford; Maya Raj; Alessandro Zerbi; Claudia Mescoli; Umberto Cillo; Massimo Rugge; Massimo Roncalli; Guido Torzilli; Lorenza Rimassa; Armando Santoro; Nicola Valeri; Matteo Fassan; Chiara Braconi
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 9.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.