Miran Blanchard1, Kevin G Shim2, Michael P Grams3, Karishma Rajani4, Rosa M Diaz4, Keith M Furutani3, Jill Thompson4, Kenneth R Olivier3, Sean S Park3, Svetomir N Markovic5, Hardev Pandha6, Alan Melcher7, Kevin Harrington8, Shane Zaidi9, Richard Vile10. 1. Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 2. Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 4. Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 5. Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 6. The Postgraduate Medical School, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom. 7. Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. 8. Targeted Therapy Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom. 9. Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Targeted Therapy Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom. 10. Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. Electronic address: vile.richard@mayo.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The oligometastatic state is an intermediate state between a malignancy that can be completely eradicated with conventional modalities and one in which a palliative approach is undertaken. Clinically, high rates of local tumor control are possible with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR), using precisely targeted, high-dose, low-fraction radiation therapy. However, in oligometastatic melanoma, virtually all patients develop progression systemically at sites not initially treated with ablative radiation therapy that cannot be managed with conventional chemotherapy and immunotherapy. We have demonstrated in mice that intravenous administration of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) expressing defined tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) generates systemic immune responses capable of clearing established tumors. Therefore, in the present preclinical study, we tested whether the combination of systemic VSV-mediated antigen delivery and SABR would be effective against oligometastatic disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We generated a model of oligometastatic melanoma in C57BL/6 immunocompetent mice and then used a combination of SABR and systemically administered VSV-TAA viral immunotherapy to treat both local and systemic disease. RESULTS: Our data showed that SABR generates excellent control or cure of local, clinically detectable, and accessible tumor through direct cell ablation. Also, the immunotherapeutic activity of systemically administered VSV-TAA generated T-cell responses that cleared subclinical metastatic tumors. We also showed that SABR induced weak T-cell-mediated tumor responses, which, particularly if boosted by VSV-TAA, might contribute to control of local and systemic disease. In addition, VSV-TAA therapy alone had significant effects on control of both local and metastatic tumors. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown in the present preliminary murine study using a single tumor model that this approach represents an effective, complementary combination therapy model that addresses the need for both systemic and local control in oligometastatic melanoma.
PURPOSE: The oligometastatic state is an intermediate state between a malignancy that can be completely eradicated with conventional modalities and one in which a palliative approach is undertaken. Clinically, high rates of local tumor control are possible with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR), using precisely targeted, high-dose, low-fraction radiation therapy. However, in oligometastatic melanoma, virtually all patients develop progression systemically at sites not initially treated with ablative radiation therapy that cannot be managed with conventional chemotherapy and immunotherapy. We have demonstrated in mice that intravenous administration of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) expressing defined tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) generates systemic immune responses capable of clearing established tumors. Therefore, in the present preclinical study, we tested whether the combination of systemic VSV-mediated antigen delivery and SABR would be effective against oligometastatic disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We generated a model of oligometastatic melanoma in C57BL/6 immunocompetent mice and then used a combination of SABR and systemically administered VSV-TAA viral immunotherapy to treat both local and systemic disease. RESULTS: Our data showed that SABR generates excellent control or cure of local, clinically detectable, and accessible tumor through direct cell ablation. Also, the immunotherapeutic activity of systemically administered VSV-TAA generated T-cell responses that cleared subclinical metastatic tumors. We also showed that SABR induced weak T-cell-mediated tumor responses, which, particularly if boosted by VSV-TAA, might contribute to control of local and systemic disease. In addition, VSV-TAA therapy alone had significant effects on control of both local and metastatic tumors. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown in the present preliminary murine study using a single tumor model that this approach represents an effective, complementary combination therapy model that addresses the need for both systemic and local control in oligometastatic melanoma.
Authors: Rosa Maria Diaz; Feorillo Galivo; Timothy Kottke; Phonphimon Wongthida; Jian Qiao; Jill Thompson; Mikael Valdes; Glen Barber; Richard G Vile Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Lilin Lai; Richard Davey; Allison Beck; Yongxian Xu; Anthony F Suffredini; Tara Palmore; Sarah Kabbani; Susan Rogers; Gary Kobinger; Judie Alimonti; Charles J Link; Lewis Rubinson; Ute Ströher; Mark Wolcott; William Dorman; Timothy M Uyeki; Heinz Feldmann; H Clifford Lane; Mark J Mulligan Journal: JAMA Date: 2015 Mar 24-31 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Amit A Lugade; James P Moran; Scott A Gerber; Robert C Rose; John G Frelinger; Edith M Lord Journal: J Immunol Date: 2005-06-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Diana M Rommelfanger; Phonphimon Wongthida; Rosa M Diaz; Karen M Kaluza; Jill M Thompson; Timothy J Kottke; Richard G Vile Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: David W Andrews; Charles B Scott; Paul W Sperduto; Adam E Flanders; Laurie E Gaspar; Michael C Schell; Maria Werner-Wasik; William Demas; Janice Ryu; Jean-Paul Bahary; Luis Souhami; Marvin Rotman; Minesh P Mehta; Walter J Curran Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-05-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Davide Franceschini; Ciro Franzese; Fiorenza De Rose; Pierina Navarria; Giuseppe R D'Agostino; Tiziana Comito; Angelo Tozzi; Maria C Tronconi; Lorenza Di Guardo; Michele Del Vecchio; Marta Scorsetti Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Kevin G Shim; Shane Zaidi; Jill Thompson; Tim Kottke; Laura Evgin; Karishma R Rajani; Matthew Schuelke; Christopher B Driscoll; Amanda Huff; Jose S Pulido; Richard G Vile Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Thomas P Monath; Patricia E Fast; Kayvon Modjarrad; David K Clarke; Brian K Martin; Joan Fusco; Richard Nichols; D Gray Heppner; Jakub K Simon; Sheri Dubey; Sean P Troth; Jayanthi Wolf; Vidisha Singh; Beth-Ann Coller; James S Robertson Journal: Vaccine X Date: 2019-01-29
Authors: Ben G L Vanneste; Evert J Van Limbergen; Ludwig Dubois; Iryna V Samarska; L Wieten; M J B Aarts; T Marcelissen; Dirk De Ruysscher Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 8.110