Literature DB >> 26460783

Content-specific expectations enhance stimulus detectability by increasing perceptual sensitivity.

Timo Stein1, Marius V Peelen1.   

Abstract

The detectability of an object in our visual environment is primarily determined by the object's low-level visual salience, resulting from the physical characteristics of the object and its surroundings. In the present study we demonstrate that object detectability is additionally influenced by internally generated expectations about object properties, and that these influences are mediated by changes in perceptual sensitivity. Using continuous flash suppression (CFS) to render objects invisible, we found that providing valid information about the category membership of the object (e.g., "car") before stimulus presentation facilitated awareness of the object, as shown by improved localization performance relative to a noninformative baseline condition and to a condition with invalid prior information. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that the effect of expectation on detection generalized to binocular viewing conditions, with valid category cues facilitating the localization and detection of briefly presented objects. Experiment 4 extended these results to simple stimuli (oriented Gabor patches), for which valid orientation information improved localization performance. Finally, in Experiment 5 we found that the effect of expectation on detection and localization performance partly reflects increased perceptual sensitivity, as evidenced by decreased contrast detection thresholds for validly cued stimuli relative to noncued and invalidly cued stimuli. Together, these findings demonstrate that prior information about specific object properties dynamically enhances the effective signal of visual input matching the expected content, thereby biasing object detection in favor of expected objects. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26460783     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  18 in total

1.  Dissociating conscious and unconscious influences on visual detection effects.

Authors:  Timo Stein; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-01-04

2.  Competitive Frontoparietal Interactions Mediate Implicit Inferences.

Authors:  Martijn E Wokke; Tony Ro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Impaired social cognition in violent offenders: perceptual deficit or cognitive bias?

Authors:  Aiste Jusyte; Michael Schönenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  Dynamic Interactions between Top-Down Expectations and Conscious Awareness.

Authors:  Erik L Meijs; Heleen A Slagter; Floris P de Lange; Simon van Gaal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Feature-Based Attention and Feature-Based Expectation.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Unpredictive linguistic verbal cues accelerate congruent visual targets into awareness in a breaking continuous flash suppression paradigm.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; Andre Sahakian; Marijn E Struiksma; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Attentional gain is modulated by probabilistic feature expectations in a spatial cueing task: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Anna Marzecová; Antonio Schettino; Andreas Widmann; Iria SanMiguel; Sonja A Kotz; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Commentary: Definitely maybe: can unconscious processes perform the same functions as conscious processes?

Authors:  Ariel Goldstein; Ran R Hassin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-04

9.  Access to Awareness for Faces during Continuous Flash Suppression Is Not Modulated by Affective Knowledge.

Authors:  Milena Rabovsky; Timo Stein; Rasha Abdel Rahman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Stimulus expectation alters decision criterion but not sensory signal in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Ji Won Bang; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.