Literature DB >> 26460382

Design of the Nationwide Nursery School Survey on Child Health Throughout the Great East Japan Earthquake.

Hiroko Matsubara1, Mami Ishikuro, Masahiro Kikuya, Shoichi Chida, Mitsuaki Hosoya, Atsushi Ono, Noriko Kato, Susumu Yokoya, Toshiaki Tanaka, Tsuyoshi Isojima, Zentaro Yamagata, Soichiro Tanaka, Shinichi Kuriyama, Shigeo Kure.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Great East Japan Earthquake inflicted severe damage on the Pacific coastal areas of northeast Japan. Although possible health impacts on aged or handicapped populations have been highlighted, little is known about how the serious disaster affected preschool children's health. We conducted a nationwide nursery school survey to investigate preschool children's physical development and health status throughout the disaster.
METHODS: The survey was conducted from September to December 2012. We mailed three kinds of questionnaires to nursery schools in all 47 prefectures in Japan. Questionnaire "A" addressed nursery school information, and questionnaires "B1" and "B2" addressed individuals' data. Our targets were children who were born from April 2, 2004, to April 1, 2005 (those who did not experience the disaster during their preschool days) and children who were born from April 2, 2006, to April 1, 2007 (those who experienced the disaster during their preschool days). The questionnaire inquired about disaster experiences, anthropometric measurements, and presence of diseases.
RESULTS: In total, 3624 nursery schools from all 47 prefectures participated in the survey. We established two nationwide retrospective cohorts of preschool children; 53,747 children who were born from April 2, 2004, to April 1, 2005, and 69,004 children who were born from April 2, 2006, to April 1, 2007. Among the latter cohort, 1003 were reported to have specific personal experiences with the disaster.
CONCLUSIONS: With the large dataset, we expect to yield comprehensive study results about preschool children's physical development and health status throughout the disaster.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26460382      PMCID: PMC4728121          DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20150073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0917-5040            Impact factor:   3.211


INTRODUCTION

The Great East Japan Earthquake, which occurred on March 11, 2011, was beyond our experience in modern Japanese history. The massive 9.0 magnitude earthquake was the largest quake ever recorded in Japan, and the following giant tsunami inflicted severe damage on the Pacific coastal areas of northeast Japan.[1]–[5] The number of deaths and missing persons due to the disaster was 18 412 across Iwate, Miyagi, and Fukushima Prefectures (Figure 1).[6] Furthermore, the earthquake caused a nuclear alert in the vicinity of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.[7]–[10]
Figure 1.

Geographic location affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake.The numbers on the map indicate prefecture codes corresponding to those in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 4.*The human damage number shows dead and missing persons in Iwate, Miyagi, and Fukushima Prefectures that were the most seriously affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake (The numbers are cited from Japan Meteorological Agency and National Police Agency).

Previous studies have reported health issues among the survivors and have focused attention on vulnerable populations, including the elderly, disabled, and hospitalized patients.[11]–[15] Children are also vulnerable, but there has been little research documenting their health after the disaster. In order to investigate the possible health impacts of the devastating natural disaster on preschool children, we conducted a nationwide nursery school survey. The survey should provide comprehensive and valuable epidemiological evidence of the impact of the disaster on preschool children, focusing on the differences in physical development before and after the disaster and assessing the extent to which experiencing the disaster, including environmental changes due to the disaster, may influence children’s health. This paper describes the design of the survey and the results of data collection.

METHODS

Survey design and population

We collected data on nursery school children not only from the most seriously affected areas of Iwate, Miyagi, and Fukushima Prefectures, but also from other areas across Japan. In the present survey, the prefectures indicate the location of the nursery schools that children were attending at the time of the survey. Prior to the survey, invitation letters were distributed to 23 711 authorized nursery schools,[16] and 4266 (18%) nursery schools expressed interest in participating in the survey. From September to December 2012, we mailed three kinds of questionnaires to the 4266 nursery schools, and nursery teachers completed the questionnaires and mailed them back to the coordination office at Tohoku University. The new school term in Japan starts on April 1, and a class consists of children who are born from April 2 to April 1 of the following year.[17] We targeted children who were born in two classes: children who were born from April 2, 2004, to April 1, 2005, who were in the 5-year-old class of 2010 and did not experience the disaster during their preschool days; and children who were born from April 2, 2006, to April 1, 2007, who were in the 5-year-old class of 2012 and experienced the disaster during their preschool days (47 to 59 months of age when the disaster occurred). We defined the former group of children as a historical control group (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

Flow of the Nationwide Nursery School Survey

Measurements

Questionnaire “A” addressed information on each nursery school: name of the nursery school, whether or not the nursery school was affected by the disaster, and the damage sustained in the disaster (collapse of the building, tsunami, fire, relocation of the nursery school, and others), if affected. Additionally, we asked for teachers’ subjective opinion through the question: “Do you think that experiencing the disaster influenced children’s development?” with an open-ended question about possible factors that might affect children’s development (eAppendix 1). Questionnaires “B1” and “B2” addressed individual data on children who were born from April 2, 2004, to April 1, 2005 and those who were born from April 2, 2006, to April 1, 2007, respectively. Both anonymous questionnaires included questions about sex, year and month of birth, presence of diseases diagnosed by medical doctors (kidney disease, heart disease, atopic dermatitis, bronchial asthma, and others), history of moving in and moving out, and anthropometric measurements. According to the guidelines for childcare in nursery school, all nursery schools have to periodically perform physical measurements (generally every month) using a measurement procedure recommended by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.[18] Considering the seasonal variation in growth, we retrospectively collected individuals’ height and weight measured in April and October for a maximum of 7 years. Additionally, we inquired about personal disaster experience with the following options: collapse of house, tsunami, fire, moving house, evacuation center, and death of a family member (eAppendix 2 and eAppendix 3).

Ethical considerations

The survey protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Tohoku University. We collected only existing data, so we did not obtain informed consent from participants in either cohort. In accordance with the national Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiological Research, we disclosed information regarding the survey in two ways: we announced the conduct of the survey to parents using a poster displayed in each nursery school, and we disclosed the survey information, including the significance, objective, and methods of the survey, to the public on the website of Tohoku University’s School of Medicine at http://www.med.tohoku.ac.jp/public/ekigaku2013.html. Parents had the right to opt out.

RESULTS

As shown in Table 1, nursery schools from all 47 prefectures participated in the survey. Of the nursery schools that agreed to participate in the survey, 3624 returned at least one of the three questionnaires. We acquired school information from 3495 nursery schools. We obtained individuals’ data for 54 558 children who were born from April 2, 2004, to April 1, 2005 (historical controls), and 69 702 children who were born from April 2, 2006, to April 1, 2007 (exposed children). As an initial data cleaning step, we excluded data on children who were born in a different year and those whose anthropometric measurements were not provided, leaving totals of 53 747 historical controls and 69 004 exposed children eligible for the initial dataset (Table 2).
Table 1.

Proportion of nursery schools that participated in the survey

PrefectureNumber of nursery schoolsProportion

CodeNameTarget (n = 23 711)Participationb (n = 3624)
1Hokkaido85513916%
2Aomori47010823%
3Iwatea3598123%
4Miyagia34613238%
5Akita2548835%
6Yamagata2414217%
7Fukushimaa3179731%
8Ibaraki4895311%
9Tochigi3537922%
10Gunma4186215%
11Saitama99316417%
12Chiba79014218%
13Tokyo185520411%
14Kanagawa114212011%
15Niigata70915622%
16Toyama3036220%
17Ishikawa3615014%
18Fukui2724015%
19Yamanashi2313716%
20Nagano5866010%
21Gifu4254210%
22Shizuoka5109819%
23Aichi120923720%
24Mie4777716%
25Shiga2082110%
26Kyoto481235%
27Osaka1236958%
28Hyogo893779%
29Nara1922513%
30Wakayama210105%
31Tottori1912915%
32Shimane2864516%
33Okayama40310626%
34Hiroshima61513221%
35Yamaguchi3105317%
36Tokushima216136%
37Kagawa2094120%
38Ehime3204915%
39Kochi2584417%
40Fukuoka90514416%
41Saga248239%
42Nagasaki4386715%
43Kumamoto5878815%
44Oita2803713%
45Miyazaki3946617%
46Kagoshima4734810%
47Okinawa393185%

aThe three prefectures that were most severely affected by the earthquake include Iwate, Miyagi, and Fukushima Prefectures.

bWe defined participation as returning at least one questionnaire from Questionnaire “A,” Questionnaire “B1,” and Questionnaire “B2.”

Table 2.

Number of completed questionnaires returned from nursery schools

PrefectureQuestionnaire A:Questions regardingnursery schoolQuestionnaire B1:Questions forchildren born fromApril 2, 2004to April 1, 2005Questionnaire B2:Questions forchildren born fromApril 2, 2006to April 1, 2007



CodeName(n = 3495)b(n = 53 747)(n = 69 004)
1Hokkaido13716652087
2Aomori10511351485
3Iwatea789061248
4Miyagia12618042390
5Akita8714631745
6Yamagata41628748
7Fukushimaa9710041557
8Ibaraki537701137
9Tochigi7711161519
10Gunma6111801223
11Saitama15524293235
12Chiba13824883228
13Tokyo19025734019
14Kanagawa11820312551
15Niigata15420203008
16Toyama6110681092
17Ishikawa49903999
18Fukui39408580
19Yamanashi37720706
20Nagano5511431292
21Gifu429271096
22Shizuoka9018862146
23Aichi23151215588
24Mie7311121437
25Shiga21427535
26Kyoto22407458
27Osaka9116112273
28Hyogo7210131464
29Nara25334500
30Wakayama9178201
31Tottori29354577
32Shimane45482699
33Okayama10417782105
34Hiroshima12525222982
35Yamaguchi51534853
36Tokushima12157156
37Kagawa40462753
38Ehime48508615
39Kochi43653763
40Fukuoka13925713145
41Saga22354418
42Nagasaki65647770
43Kumamoto809951336
44Oita36311467
45Miyazaki59415905
46Kagoshima46452774
47Okinawa1782139

aThe three prefectures that were most severely affected by the earthquake include Iwate, Miyagi, and Fukushima Prefectures.

bTotal number was not equal to 3624 as described in Table 1 because 129 nursery schools did not return Questionnaire “A.”

aThe three prefectures that were most severely affected by the earthquake include Iwate, Miyagi, and Fukushima Prefectures. bWe defined participation as returning at least one questionnaire from Questionnaire “A,” Questionnaire “B1,” and Questionnaire “B2.” aThe three prefectures that were most severely affected by the earthquake include Iwate, Miyagi, and Fukushima Prefectures. bTotal number was not equal to 3624 as described in Table 1 because 129 nursery schools did not return Questionnaire “A.” Table 3 briefly summarizes the characteristics of each cohort. The two cohorts were similar in distributions of sex, birth month, and presence of diseases diagnosed by medical doctors. Among children who experienced the disaster during their preschool days, 1003 (1.5%) were reported to have specific personal experiences with the disaster.
Table 3.

Characteristics of nursery school children

 Children bornfrom April 2, 2004to April 1, 2005Children bornfrom April 2, 2006to April 1, 2007P


n%n%
Sex0.31
 Boy27 82351.8%35 53651.5% 
 Girl25 44947.3%32 88447.7% 
 Missing4750.9%5840.8% 
Birth month0.58
 April45568.5%56578.2% 
 May45628.5%59688.6% 
 June44048.2%57338.3% 
 July47488.8%59928.7% 
 August46768.7%59468.6% 
 September46808.7%60288.7% 
 October44058.2%56938.3% 
 November42948.0%56428.2% 
 December43618.1%56828.2% 
 January44828.3%56808.2% 
 February37717.0%48017.0% 
 March42217.9%55288.0% 
 April (following year)1100.2%1140.2% 
 Missing4770.9%5400.8% 
Presence of diseases diagnosed by medical doctors0.28
 No44 38082.6%58 46284.7% 
 Yes606411.3%783211.4% 
 Unknown3070.6%3420.5% 
 Missing29965.6%23683.4% 
Experience of the disaster 
 NoN/A 62 24490.2% 
 YesN/A 10031.5% 
 MissingN/A 57578.3% 
(Specific experience) 
 Collapse of house  366  
 Tsunami  224  
 Fire  3  
 Moving house  189  
 Evacuation right  279  
 Death of family member  31  

Differences in sex, birth month, and presence of diseases between two cohorts were tested by chi-square tests.

Differences in sex, birth month, and presence of diseases between two cohorts were tested by chi-square tests. Table 4 presents the residential distribution of children with personal disaster experiences based on the location of the nursery schools that children were attending at the time of the survey. While 732 children (73.0%) were residing in Iwate, Miyagi, and Fukushima Prefectures, 271 (27.0%) were residing in various parts of the country other than the three affected prefectures.
Table 4.

Residential distribution of children with personal disaster experiences

PrefectureDisaster experience

CodeNameNo (n = 62 244)Yes (n = 1003)
1Hokkaido19114
2Aomori137214
3Iwatea109496
4Miyagia1727351
5Akita16508
6Yamagata66531
7Fukushimaa1116285
8Ibaraki98378
9Tochigi13956
10Gunma11015
11Saitama294211
12Chiba298741
13Tokyo382510
14Kanagawa23574
15Niigata270912
16Toyama9840
17Ishikawa8681
18Fukui5510
19Yamanashi6692
20Nagano11364
21Gifu9850
22Shizuoka19663
23Aichi49747
24Mie12581
25Shiga4891
26Kyoto4020
27Osaka20632
28Hyogo13422
29Nara4891
30Wakayama1980
31Tottori5521
32Shimane6690
33Okayama19963
34Hiroshima26271
35Yamaguchi7610
36Tokushima1341
37Kagawa7350
38Ehime5711
39Kochi6801
40Fukuoka28759
41Saga3600
42Nagasaki7020
43Kumamoto12293
44Oita4421
45Miyazaki8411
46Kagoshima7291
47Okinawa1330
 
 Three most affected prefecturesa3937732
 Others58 287271

aThe three prefectures that were most severely affected by the earthquake include Iwate, Miyagi, and Fukushima Prefectures.

aThe three prefectures that were most severely affected by the earthquake include Iwate, Miyagi, and Fukushima Prefectures.

DISCUSSION

The present survey is the first nationwide survey to investigate how the Great East Japan Earthquake affected preschool children’s physical development and health status. The main strength of the present survey is the large amount of data we acquired. With the cooperation of 3624 nursery schools all over Japan, we established nationwide retrospective cohorts of 53 747 children who were born from April 1, 2004, to April 2, 2005, and 69 004 children who were born from April 1, 2006, to April 2, 2007. These cohorts represent 4.9% and 6.3% of the number of births in Japan during the same period, respectively.[19] Preschool education in Japan is mainly provided either by nursery schools, which are governed by the Child Welfare Act and operate under the supervision of municipal governments,[16],[20],[21] or by kindergartens, which are governed by the School Education Act[22]; a nursery school is a childcare and educational facility that cares for children ranging from newborn infants to preschool children, whereas a kindergarten offers early childhood education for children aged 3 to 5 years. Because nursery schools care for children for a longer period than kindergartens, we targeted nursery school children and obtained longitudinal data of physical measurements. Generalizability should be interpreted with caution. However, it has been reported that more than 40% of Japanese preschool children aged 3 years and older currently attend nursery schools and that the number of nursery school children has been increasing,[16],[23] so nursery school children may be sufficiently representative. In addition, all nursery school teachers have paid close attention to children’s physical development by conducting periodic body measurements. They graduated from schools designated by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare as educational institutions for nursery teachers, passed a national examination, and registered in the nursery teachers’ registry.[21] Therefore, the anthropomorphic measurements obtained by such qualified teachers may be sufficiently reliable and accurate. Ochi et al suggested that evaluations of the health impacts of disasters need baseline data from before the events.[11] We therefore retrospectively collected nursery school children’s anthropometric measurements for a maximum of 14 times. Specifically, for children who experienced the disaster during their preschool days, we obtained their height and weight measured in April and October between 2006 and 2012, including 10 measurements before the disaster and four measurements after the disaster. Thus, the data reflect childhood physical development trajectories before and after the disaster. We observed preschool children who had personal experiences with the disaster not only in Iwate, Miyagi, and Fukushima Prefectures, which were devastated by the disaster, but also in other areas all over Japan. Among 1003 children who were reported to have specific disaster experiences, 271 (27.0%) were residing outside of the affected prefectures. Because we conducted a nationwide survey, we collected valuable data, including data on children who might have moved from the affected areas. In conclusion, by comprehensively examining the results from the present survey, we aim to provide valuable epidemiological evidence that may not only shed light on the impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake disaster on preschool children’s physical development and health, but may also provide specific suggestions for response to the next mega-disaster worldwide.
  9 in total

1.  Investigations on radioactive substances released from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Yamaguchi
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2011

2.  Fukushima residents still struggling 2 years after disaster.

Authors:  Justin McCurry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Peptic ulcers after the Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami: possible existence of psychosocial stress ulcers in humans.

Authors:  Takeshi Kanno; Kastunori Iijima; Yasuhiko Abe; Tomoyuki Koike; Norihiro Shimada; Tatsuya Hoshi; Nozomu Sano; Motoki Ohyauchi; Hirotaka Ito; Tomoaki Atsumi; Hidetomo Konishi; Sho Asonuma; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  The Great East-Japan Earthquake and devastating tsunami: an update and lessons from the past Great Earthquakes in Japan since 1923.

Authors:  Akemi Ishigaki; Hikari Higashi; Takako Sakamoto; Shigeki Shibahara
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Impact of a large-scale natural disaster on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the aftermath of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake.

Authors:  Seiichi Kobayashi; Masakazu Hanagama; Shinsuke Yamanda; Hikari Satoh; Shinsaku Tokuda; Masakazu Kobayashi; Shinsaku Ueda; Satoshi Suzuki; Masaru Yanai
Journal:  Respir Investig       Date:  2012-12-27

6.  Effects of the Great East Japan Earthquake and huge tsunami on glycaemic control and blood pressure in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Susumu Ogawa; Mikihito Ishiki; Kazuhiro Nako; Masashi Okamura; Miho Senda; Takuya Sakamoto; Sadayoshi Ito
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The time variation of dose rate artificially increased by the Fukushima nuclear crisis.

Authors:  Masahiro Hosoda; Shinji Tokonami; Atsuyuki Sorimachi; Satoru Monzen; Minoru Osanai; Masatoshi Yamada; Ikuo Kashiwakura; Suminori Akiba
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The great East Japan earthquake disaster: a compilation of published literature on health needs and relief activities, march 2011-september 2012.

Authors:  Sae Ochi; Virginia Murray; Susan Hodgson
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2013-05-13

9.  Life-event stress induced by the Great East Japan Earthquake was associated with relapse in ulcerative colitis but not Crohn's disease: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hisashi Shiga; Teruko Miyazawa; Yoshitaka Kinouchi; Seiichi Takahashi; Gen Tominaga; Hiroki Takahashi; Sho Takagi; Nobuya Obana; Tatsuya Kikuchi; Shinya Oomori; Eiki Nomura; Manabu Shiraki; Yuichirou Sato; Shuichiro Takahashi; Ken Umemura; Hiroshi Yokoyama; Katsuya Endo; Yoichi Kakuta; Hiroki Aizawa; Masaki Matsuura; Tomoya Kimura; Masatake Kuroha; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  Longitudinal changes in body mass index of children affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake.

Authors:  W Zheng; H Yokomichi; H Matsubara; M Ishikuro; M Kikuya; T Isojima; S Yokoya; T Tanaka; N Kato; S Chida; A Ono; M Hosoya; S Tanaka; S Kuriyama; S Kure; Z Yamagata
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Earlier BMI rebound and lower pre-rebound BMI as risk of obesity among Japanese preschool children.

Authors:  N Kato; T Isojima; S Yokoya; T Tanaka; A Ono; H Yokomichi; Z Yamagata; S Tanaka; H Matsubara; M Ishikuro; M Kikuya; S Chida; M Hosoya; S Kuriyama; S Kure
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Impact of the great east Japan earthquake on the body mass index of preschool children: a nationwide nursery school survey.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yokomichi; Wei Zheng; Hiroko Matsubara; Mami Ishikuro; Masahiro Kikuya; Tsuyoshi Isojima; Susumu Yokoya; Toshiaki Tanaka; Noriko Kato; Shoichi Chida; Atsushi Ono; Mitsuaki Hosoya; Soichiro Tanaka; Shinichi Kuriyama; Shigeo Kure; Zentaro Yamagata
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Alterations in physique among young children after the Great East Japan Earthquake: Results from a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Masahiro Kikuya; Hiroko Matsubara; Mami Ishikuro; Yuki Sato; Taku Obara; Hirohito Metoki; Tsuyoshi Isojima; Susumu Yokoya; Noriko Kato; Toshiaki Tanaka; Shoichi Chida; Atsushi Ono; Mitsuaki Hosoya; Hiroshi Yokomichi; Zentaro Yamagata; Soichiro Tanaka; Shigeo Kure; Shinichi Kuriyama
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.211

5.  Disease prevalence among nursery school children after the Great East Japan earthquake.

Authors:  Mami Ishikuro; Hiroko Matsubara; Masahiro Kikuya; Taku Obara; Yuki Sato; Hirohito Metoki; Tsuyoshi Isojima; Susumu Yokoya; Noriko Kato; Toshiaki Tanaka; Shoichi Chida; Atsushi Ono; Mitsuaki Hosoya; Hiroshi Yokomichi; Zentaro Yamagata; Soichiro Tanaka; Shigeo Kure; Shinichi Kuriyama
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2017-03-27

6.  Design of the health examination survey on early childhood physical growth in the Great East Japan Earthquake affected areas.

Authors:  Hiroko Matsubara; Mami Ishikuro; Masahiro Kikuya; Shoichi Chida; Mitsuaki Hosoya; Atsushi Ono; Noriko Kato; Susumu Yokoya; Toshiaki Tanaka; Tsuyoshi Isojima; Zentaro Yamagata; Soichiro Tanaka; Shinichi Kuriyama; Shigeo Kure
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.211

7.  School restrictions on outdoor activities and weight status in adolescent children after Japan's 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant disaster: a mid-term to long-term retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Shuhei Nomura; Marta Blangiardo; Masaharu Tsubokura; Sae Ochi; Susan Hodgson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.