Claude Nguyen1, Osman Mir1, Farhaan Vahidy1, Tzu-Ching Wu1, Karen Albright2, Amelia Boehme3, Rigoberto Delgado4, Sean Savitz5. 1. Department of Neurology, University of Texas-Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas. 2. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 3. Department of Neurology, Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New York, New York. 4. School of Public Health, University of Texas-Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas. 5. Department of Neurology, University of Texas-Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: sean.i.savitz@uth.tmc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As a comprehensive stroke center (CSC), we accept transfer patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in our region. CSC guidelines mandate receipt of patients with ICH for higher level of care. We determined resource utilization of patients accepted from outside hospitals compared with patients directly arriving to our center. METHODS: From our stroke registry, we compared patients with primary ICH transferred to those directly arriving to our CSC from March 2011-March 2012. We compared the proportion of patients who utilized at least one of these resources: neurointensive care unit (NICU), neurosurgical intervention, or clinical trial enrollment. RESULTS: Among the 362 patients, 210 (58%) were transfers. Transferred patients were older, had higher median Glasgow Coma Scale scores, and lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores than directly admitted patients. Transfers had smaller median ICH volumes (20.5 cc versus 15.2 cc; P = .04) and lower ICH scores (2.1 ± 1.4 versus 1.6 ± 1.3; P < .01). A smaller proportion of transfers utilized CSC-specific resources compared with direct admits (P = .02). Fewer transferred patients required neurosurgical intervention or were enrolled in trials. No significant difference was found in the proportion of patients who used NICU resources, although transferred patients had a significantly lower length of stay in the NICU. Average hospital stay costs were less for transferred patients than for direct admits. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ICH transferred to our CSC underwent fewer neurosurgical procedures and had a shorter stay in the NICU. These results were reflected in the lower per-patient costs in the transferred group. Our results raise the need to analyze cost-benefits and resource utilization of transferring patients with milder ICH.
BACKGROUND: As a comprehensive stroke center (CSC), we accept transfer patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in our region. CSC guidelines mandate receipt of patients with ICH for higher level of care. We determined resource utilization of patients accepted from outside hospitals compared with patients directly arriving to our center. METHODS: From our stroke registry, we compared patients with primary ICH transferred to those directly arriving to our CSC from March 2011-March 2012. We compared the proportion of patients who utilized at least one of these resources: neurointensive care unit (NICU), neurosurgical intervention, or clinical trial enrollment. RESULTS: Among the 362 patients, 210 (58%) were transfers. Transferred patients were older, had higher median Glasgow Coma Scale scores, and lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores than directly admitted patients. Transfers had smaller median ICH volumes (20.5 cc versus 15.2 cc; P = .04) and lower ICH scores (2.1 ± 1.4 versus 1.6 ± 1.3; P < .01). A smaller proportion of transfers utilized CSC-specific resources compared with direct admits (P = .02). Fewer transferred patients required neurosurgical intervention or were enrolled in trials. No significant difference was found in the proportion of patients who used NICU resources, although transferred patients had a significantly lower length of stay in the NICU. Average hospital stay costs were less for transferred patients than for direct admits. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with ICH transferred to our CSC underwent fewer neurosurgical procedures and had a shorter stay in the NICU. These results were reflected in the lower per-patient costs in the transferred group. Our results raise the need to analyze cost-benefits and resource utilization of transferring patients with milder ICH.
Authors: Jeffrey J Fletcher; Vikas Kotagal; Aaron Mammoser; Mark Peterson; Lewis B Morgenstern; James F Burke Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Mohammad H Rahbar; Nicole R Gonzales; Manouchehr Ardjomand-Hessabi; Amirali Tahanan; Melvin R Sline; Hui Peng; Renganayaki Pandurengan; Farhaan S Vahidy; Jessica D Tanksley; Ayodeji A Delano; Rene M Malazarte; Ellie E Choi; Sean I Savitz; James C Grotta Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2013-06-15 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Tzu-Ching Wu; Amrou Sarraj; Amber Jacobs; Loren Shen; Hari Indupuru; Donna Biscamp; Victor Ho; Christy Ankrom; James C Grotta; Sean I Savitz; Andrew D Barreto Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 4.511
Authors: Farhaan S Vahidy; Ellie G Meyer; Arvind B Bambhroliya; Jennifer R Meeks; Charles E Begley; Tzu-Ching Wu; Jon E Tyson; Charles C Miller; Ritvij Bowry; Wamda O Ahmed; Gretchel A Gealogo; Louise D McCullough; Steven Warach; Sean I Savitz Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Kori Sauser Zachrison; Emily Aaronson; Sadiqa Mahmood; Jonathan Rosand; Anand Viswanathan; Lee H Schwamm; Joshua N Goldstein Journal: Stroke Vasc Neurol Date: 2019-11-28
Authors: Daojun Hong; Dana Stradling; Cyrus K Dastur; Yama Akbari; Leonid Groysman; Lama Al-Khoury; Jefferson Chen; Steven L Small; Wengui Yu Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 4.003