Literature DB >> 2646004

Randomized trial to evaluate the addition of tamoxifen to cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, prednisone adjuvant therapy in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer.

J N Ingle1, L K Everson, H S Wieand, S A Cullinan, L E Wold, J B Hagen, J K Martin, J E Krook, R G Fitzgibbons, J F Foley.   

Abstract

A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if the addition of hormonal therapy with tamoxifen to a combination chemotherapy regimen was superior to the chemotherapy alone for adjuvant treatment of premenopausal women after mastectomy for node-positive breast cancer. The chemotherapy regimen utilized consisted of cyclophosphamide (C), 5-fluorouracil (F), and prednisone (P), and the doses employed were: C, 150 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 5; F, 300 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 5; and P, 10 mg orally three times daily on days 1 to 7. A total of ten courses of therapy, given every 6 weeks, was planned. Tamoxifen (T) was given at a dose of 10 mg twice daily and was stopped 6 weeks after the last course of CFP. Four hundred patients are fully eligible and evaluable. With a median observation time of 5.3 years, the proportion of recurrences on each arm were: CFP, 95 of 202 (47%); CFPT, 77 of 198 (39%). The relapse-free survival distribution for CFPT was superior to that for CFP, at a borderline level of significance (two-sided P = 0.06). When significant prognostic factors were considered in covariate analysis, CFPT was not significantly better than CFP (P = 0.43). This marked change in level was due to imbalance in several factors not considered in stratification. Currently, 31% of CFP and 25% of CFPT patients have died, and although there is a slight separation of the survival curves in favor of CFPT, the difference is not significant (P = 0.21). Analysis within receptor subsets also showed no significant advantage for the addition of tamoxifen. This study does not establish a significant advantage for the concurrent administration of tamoxifen with the CFP regimen. It does, however, clearly demonstrate the importance of examination of clinically important prognostic factors, even those not utilized in stratification, and consideration of these factors in covariate analysis if imbalances are present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2646004     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890401)63:7<1257::aid-cncr2820630705>3.0.co;2-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  5 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and Potential for Ovarian Preservation with SERMs.

Authors:  Alison Y Ting; Brian K Petroff
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Meta-analysis of vascular and neoplastic events associated with tamoxifen.

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite; Rowan T Chlebowski; Joseph Lau; Suzanne George; Rachel Hess; Nananda F Col
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Shannon Puhalla; Adam Brufsky; Nancy Davidson
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  4-Hydroxytamoxifen enhances sensitivity of estrogen receptor α-positive breast cancer to docetaxel in an estrogen and ZNF423 SNP-dependent fashion.

Authors:  Gen Wang; Sisi Qin; Jacqueline Zayas; James N Ingle; Mohan Liu; Richard M Weinshilboum; Kunwei Shen; Liewei Wang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Positive effect of tamoxifen as part of adjuvant chemo-endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Hokkaido Adjuvant Chemo-Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  J Uchino; N Samejima; T Tanabe; H Hayasaka; M Mito; Y Hata; K Asaishi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.