| Literature DB >> 26459871 |
Wang Gao1, Ting Ting Cui1, Yong Fu Zhu1, Zi Wen1, Ming Zhao1, Jian Chen Li1, Qing Jiang1.
Abstract
Ultralow stability of gold clusters prohibits the understanding of their intrinsic reactivity (that is vital for revealing the origin of gold's catalytic properties). Using density functional theory including many-body dispersion method, we aim to ascertain effective ways in exploiting gold clusters' intrinsic reactivity on class="Chemical">carbon class="Chemical">naclass="Chemical">notuEntities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26459871 PMCID: PMC4602230 DOI: 10.1038/srep15095
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Adsorption properties of the Au5–6clusters on D10 ~ D80.
(a) Configurations of the optimal Au5–6 clusters on D10 ~ D80. (b) Adsorption energies of the standing and lying modes for the Au5–6 clusters on D10 ~ D80. The lines guide the eye. With decreasing of the curvature (from D10 to D80), Au5–6 gradually transform from the standing mode to the lying mode, which are determined by the competition of chemisorption and physisorption.
Figure 2Electronic and geometric properties of the Au5 clusters.
(a,b) Atomic distribution of the HOMOs of the isolated Au5 clusters and those supported on D80, with the optimal configurations of the adsorption of O2 on these clusters. (c) HOMOs of the Au5 clusters on D80N, D80O, and D80B where the subscript N, O, B denote the doping element. (d) The electron density difference of the Au5 clusters on these doped D80 (both lying and standing modes for D80N). The different colours of HOMOs represent opposite signs of wavefunctions. LUMOs of O2 are not shown for simplification. For the electron density difference, blue-green (red) indicates the deletion (accumulation) of electron density. The numbers in bold are the bond lengths of adsorbed O2, while those in italic are the charges on O2 Q (e) with Hirshfeld definition.
Hirshfeld charges Q (e) of the Au5, Au6, O2/Au5, and O2/Au6 complexes on D40 and D40N where the subscript N denotes the doping element, compared to the corresponding results on the isolated gold clusters.
| Species | Free | D40 | D40N | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBE | HSE | PBE | HSE | PBE | HSE | ||
| Au5 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 | 0.13 | −0.33 | −0.31 | |
| O2/Au5 | 0.22 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.19 | 0.30 | |
| −0.11 | −0.20 | −0.11 | −0.13 | −0.17 | −0.16 | ||
| −0.11 | −0.20 | −0.11 | −0.13 | −0.17 | −0.16 | ||
| Au6 | 0 | 0 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.14 | |
| O2/Au6 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.13 | |
| −0.03 | −0.01 | −0.05 | −0.01 | −0.10 | −0.04 | ||
| −0.04 | −0.02 | −0.06 | −0.02 | −0.12 | −0.05 | ||
O1 and O2 indicate the oxygen atom of adsorbed O2. Both PBE and HSE results are shown for comparison purpose.
Figure 3The comparison of adsorption energy for the Au4–7 clusters on the substrates of D10 ~ D80 and (D10 ~ D80)N.
Adsorption energies of the Au4–7 clusters are overall increased towards Nitrogen doping.