Literature DB >> 26459646

Point-of-Care Quantitative Measure of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Enzyme Deficiency.

Vinod K Bhutani1, Michael Kaplan2, Bertil Glader3, Michael Cotten4, Jairus Kleinert5, Vamsee Pamula6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Widespread newborn screening on a point-of-care basis could prevent bilirubin neurotoxicity in newborns with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. We evaluated a quantitative G6PD assay on a digital microfluidic platform by comparing its performance with standard clinical methods.
METHODS: G6PD activity was measured quantitatively by using digital microfluidic fluorescence and the gold standard fluorescence biochemical test on a convenience sample of 98 discarded blood samples. Twenty-four samples were designated as G6PD deficient.
RESULTS: Mean ± SD G6PD activity for normal samples using the digital microfluidic method and the standard method, respectively, was 9.7 ± 2.8 and 11.1 ± 3.0 U/g hemoglobin (Hb), respectively; for G6PD-deficient samples, it was 0.8 ± 0.7 and 1.4 ± 0.9 U/g Hb. Bland-Altman analysis determined a mean difference of -0.96 ± 1.8 U/g Hb between the digital microfluidic fluorescence results and the standard biochemical test results. The lower and upper limits for the digital microfluidic platform were 4.5 to 19.5 U/g Hb for normal samples and 0.2 to 3.7 U/g Hb for G6PD-deficient samples. The lower and upper limits for the Stanford method were 5.5 to 20.7 U/g Hb for normal samples and 0.1 to 2.8 U/g Hb for G6PD-deficient samples. The measured activity discriminated between G6PD-deficient samples and normal samples with no overlap.
CONCLUSIONS: Pending further validation, a digital microfluidics platform could be an accurate point-of-care screening tool for rapid newborn G6PD screening.
Copyright © 2015 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26459646      PMCID: PMC4621802          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-2122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  23 in total

1.  Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: from genotype to phenotype.

Authors:  Lucio Luzzatto
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 2.  Parental education and the WHO neonatal G-6-PD screening program: a quarter century later.

Authors:  M Kaplan; C Hammerman; V K Bhutani
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Risk factors for neurotoxicity in newborns with severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.

Authors:  Rasha Gamaleldin; Iman Iskander; Iman Seoud; Hanan Aboraya; Aleksandr Aravkin; Paul D Sampson; Richard P Wennberg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Digital microfluidics: a future technology in the newborn screening laboratory?

Authors:  David S Millington; Ramakrishna Sista; Allen Eckhardt; Jeremy Rouse; Deeksha Bali; Ronald Goldberg; Michael Cotten; Rebecca Buckley; Vamsee Pamula
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.300

5.  Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in term and near-term, male African American neonates.

Authors:  Michael Kaplan; James D Hoyer; Marguerite Herschel; Cathy Hammerman; David K Stevenson
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.786

6.  Digital microfluidic platform for multiplexing enzyme assays: implications for lysosomal storage disease screening in newborns.

Authors:  Ramakrishna S Sista; Allen E Eckhardt; Tong Wang; Carrie Graham; Jeremy L Rouse; Scott M Norton; Vijay Srinivasan; Michael G Pollack; Adviye A Tolun; Deeksha Bali; David S Millington; Vamsee K Pamula
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Incidence, etiology, and outcomes of hazardous hyperbilirubinemia in newborns.

Authors:  Michael W Kuzniewicz; Andrea C Wickremasinghe; Yvonne W Wu; Charles E McCulloch; Eileen M Walsh; Soora Wi; Thomas B Newman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  Addressing the burden of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia in countries with significant glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency.

Authors:  Bolajoko O Olusanya; Abieyuwa A Emokpae; Tara G Zamora; Tina M Slusher
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.299

9.  Predischarge screening for severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia identifies infants who need phototherapy.

Authors:  Vinod K Bhutani; Ann R Stark; Laura C Lazzeroni; Ronald Poland; Glenn R Gourley; Steve Kazmierczak; Linda Meloy; Anthony E Burgos; Judith Y Hall; David K Stevenson
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Hyperbilirubinemia among African American, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient neonates.

Authors:  Michael Kaplan; Marguerite Herschel; Cathy Hammerman; James D Hoyer; David K Stevenson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  9 in total

1.  The African-American neonate at risk for extreme hyperbilirubinemia: a better management strategy is needed.

Authors:  W C Golden
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Prevalence of inherited blood disorders and associations with malaria and anemia in Malawian children.

Authors:  Patrick T McGann; Anne M Williams; Graham Ellis; Kathryn E McElhinney; Laurel Romano; Julia Woodall; Thad A Howard; Gerald Tegha; Robert Krysiak; R Murray Lark; E Louise Ander; Carine Mapango; Kenneth I Ataga; Satish Gopal; Nigel S Key; Russell E Ware; Parminder S Suchdev
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-13

Review 3.  Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency and Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia: Insights on Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Gene Variants in Disease Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Heng Yang Lee; Azlin Ithnin; Raja Zahratul Azma; Ainoon Othman; Armindo Salvador; Fook Choe Cheah
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.569

4.  A novel point-of-care device for measuring glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase enzyme deficiency.

Authors:  Ronald J Wong; Cynthia Montiel; Megana Kunda; David K Stevenson; Vinod K Bhutani
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.300

5.  Validation of the quantitative point-of-care CareStart biosensor for assessment of G6PD activity in venous blood.

Authors:  Germana Bancone; Gornpan Gornsawun; Cindy S Chu; Pen Porn; Sampa Pal; Pooja Bansil; Gonzalo J Domingo; Francois Nosten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Point-of-Care Testing for G6PD Deficiency: Opportunities for Screening.

Authors:  Athena Anderle; Germana Bancone; Gonzalo J Domingo; Emily Gerth-Guyette; Sampa Pal; Ari W Satyagraha
Journal:  Int J Neonatal Screen       Date:  2018-11-19

7.  Diagnostic performances of the fluorescent spot test for G6PD deficiency in newborns along the Thailand-Myanmar border: A cohort study.

Authors:  Laurence Thielemans; Gornpan Gornsawun; Borimas Hanboonkunupakarn; Moo Kho Paw; Pen Porn; Paw Khu Moo; Bart Van Overmeire; Stephane Proux; François Nosten; Rose McGready; Verena I Carrara; Germana Bancone
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2018-01-02

8.  Prevalence of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in neonates in Egypt.

Authors:  Soheir Abo Elella; Mahaa Tawfik; Naglaa Barseem; Wafaa Moustafa
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.526

9.  Evaluation of a Novel Quantitative Test for Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency: Bringing Quantitative Testing for Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency Closer to the Patient.

Authors:  Sampa Pal; Pooja Bansil; Germana Bancone; Sevan Hrutkay; Maria Kahn; Gornpan Gornsawun; Pimsupah Penpitchaporn; Cindy S Chu; François Nosten; Gonzalo J Domingo
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.345

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.