Literature DB >> 26459473

Anterior fixation of unstable pelvic ring fractures using the modified Stoppa approach: mid-term results are independent on patients' age.

J D Bastian1, A Ansorge2, S Tomagra2, K A Siebenrock2, L M Benneker2, L Büchler2, M J B Keel2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Open surgical management of unstable pelvic ring injuries has been discussed controversially compared to percutaneous techniques in terms of surgical site morbidity especially in older patients. Thus, we assessed the impact of age on the outcome following fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries through the modified Stoppa approach.
METHODS: Out of a consecutive series of 92 patients eligible for the study, 63 patients (mean age 50 years, range 19-78) were evaluated [accuracy of reduction, complications, failures, Majeed-Score, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI), Mainz Pain Staging System (MPSS)] at a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (range 1.0-7.9). Logistic multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the outcome in relation to increasing patient age and/or Injury Severity Score (ISS).
RESULTS: Out of 63 patients, in 36 an "anatomic" reduction was achieved. Ten postoperative complications occurred in eight patients. In five patients, failure of fixation was noted at the anterior and/or posterior pelvic ring. In 49 patients, an "excellent" or "good" Majeed-Score was obtained; the mean ODI was 14 % (range 0-76 %); 50 patients reported either no or only minor chronic pelvic pain (MPSS). Only an increasing ISS conferred an increased likelihood of the occurrence of a non-anatomical reduction, a "poor" or "fair" Majeed-Score, or an ODI >20 %.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing age did not impact the analysed parameters. Open reduction and internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring through a modified Stoppa approach in unstable pelvic ring injuries did not result in an unfavourable outcome with increasing age of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Modified Stoppa approach; Osteosynthesis; Outcome; Pelvic ring injury

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26459473     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-015-0577-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  29 in total

1.  Indications for anterior fixation of pelvic fractures.

Authors:  J M Matta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures.

Authors:  S A Majeed
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-03

3.  [Original procedure of groin hernia repair: interposition without fixation of Dacron tulle prosthesis by subperitoneal median approach].

Authors:  R Stoppa; J Petit; H Abourachid; X Henry; C Duclaye; G Monchaux; J P Hillebrant
Journal:  Chirurgie       Date:  1973-02

4.  Internal fracture fixation using the Stoppa approach in pelvic ring and acetabular fractures: technical aspects and operative results.

Authors:  Kees-Jan Ponsen; Pieter Joosse; Arvid Schigt; J Carel Goslings; Carel J Goslings; Jan S K Luitse
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-09

5.  Treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries with an internal anterior fixator and posterior fixation: initial clinical series.

Authors:  Rahul Vaidya; Robert Colen; Jonathan Vigdorchik; Fredrick Tonnos; Anil Sethi
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  High incidence of chronic pain following surgery for pelvic fracture.

Authors:  Christian Sylvest Meyhoff; Camilla Højland Thomsen; Lars Simon Rasmussen; Per Rotbøll Nielsen
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Surgical technique: a percutaneous method of subcutaneous fixation for the anterior pelvic ring: the pelvic bridge.

Authors:  Timothy G Hiesterman; Brian W Hill; Peter A Cole
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Anterior pelvic external fixator versus subcutaneous internal fixator in the treatment of anterior ring pelvic fractures.

Authors:  Peter A Cole; Erich M Gauger; Jack Anavian; Thuan V Ly; Robert A Morgan; Archie A Heddings
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: Recommendations for surgical treatment.

Authors:  Pol Maria Rommens; Alexander Hofmann
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Modified and new approaches for pelvic and acetabular surgery.

Authors:  Eero Hirvensalo; Jan Lindahl; Veikko Kiljunen
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  5 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of anterior ring fixation of the ramus in type C pelvis fractures.

Authors:  S McLachlin; M Lesieur; D Stephen; H Kreder; C Whyne
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Are two retrograde 3.5 mm screws superior to one 7.3 mm screw for anterior pelvic ring fixation in bones with low bone mineral density?

Authors:  Y P Acklin; I Zderic; S Grechenig; R G Richards; P Schmitz; B Gueorguiev
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.853

3.  MODIFIED STOPPA APPROACH FOR PELVIC AND ACETABULAR FRACTURE TREATMENT.

Authors:  Hong-Zhang Guo; Yu-Fang He; Wan-Qing He
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.513

4.  A computed tomography based survey study investigating the agreement of the therapeutic strategy for fragility fractures of the pelvis.

Authors:  Daniel Wagner; Andreas Höch; Philipp Pieroh; Tim Hohmann; Florian Gras; Sven Märdian; Alexander Pflug; Silvan Wittenberg; Christoph Ihle; Notker Blankenburg; Kevin Dallacker-Losensky; Tanja Schröder; Steven C Herath; Hans-Georg Palm; Christoph Josten; Fabian M Stuby
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Clinical research on minimally invasive internal fixation for the treatment of anterior ring injury in tile C pelvic fracture.

Authors:  Xiaochen Sun; Huimin Yan; Jianmin Wang; Zhaojie Liu; Wei Tian; Jian Jia
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.