| Literature DB >> 26459359 |
Susana Hoette1, Claudia Figueiredo2, Bruno Dias3, Jose Leonidas Alves4, Francisca Gavilanes5, Luis Felipe Prada6, Dany Jasinowodolinski7, Luciana Tamie Kato Morinaga8, Carlos Jardim9, Caio Julio Cesar Fernandes10, Rogério Souza11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (Sch-PAH) might represent the most prevalent form of PAH worldwide. In Sch-PAH, the presence of aneurismal dilation of the pulmonary artery has been described, although it is still a matter of debate whether on average the pulmonary artery is more enlarged in Sc-PAH than IPAH.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26459359 PMCID: PMC4603807 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-015-0115-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pulm Med ISSN: 1471-2466 Impact factor: 3.317
Demographics, hemodynamic and CTPA data
| IPAH | Sch-PAH |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||
| Male | 4 (16 %) | 4 (18 %) | ns |
| Female | 21 (84 %) | 18 (81 %) | |
| Age | 40 ± 13 | 48 ± 13 | 0.019 |
| Functional class | |||
| I/II | 7 (28 %) | 7 (32 %) | ns |
| III/IV | 18 (72 %) | 15 (68 %) | |
| Hemodynamics | |||
| mPAP (mmHg) | 63 ± 23 | 56 ± 23 | ns |
| RAP (mmHg) | 15 ± 11 | 9 ± 4 | 0.018 |
| PAOP (mmHg) | 12 ± 6 | 15 ± 7 | ns |
| PVR (IU) | 15.4 ± 5.1 | 10.2 ± 6.1 | 0.009 |
| CO (mL/min) | 4.9 ± 1.8 | 3.8 ± 1.2 | 0.03 |
| CTPA measurements | |||
| MPAD, cm | 3.7 ± 1.1 | 4.5 ± 1.8 | 0.018 |
| RPAD, cm | 2.58 ± 0.47 | 3.16 ± 0.91 | 0.009 |
| LPAD, cm | 2.5 ± 0.4 | 2.7 ± 0.6 | ns |
IPAH idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, Sch-PAH schistosomiasis associated pulmonary hypertension, NYHA FC New York Heart Association functional class, mPAP mean pulmonary arterial pressure, RAP right atrial pressure, PAOP pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, PVR pulmonary vascular resistance, CO cardiac output, MPAD main pulmonary artery diameter, RPAD right pulmonary artery diameter, LPAD left pulmonary artery diameter, ns non significant
Fig. 1CTPA showing the measurement of the MPAD in a Sch-PAH patient (a) and in a IPAH patient (b). Sch-PAH patient has a larger MPAD (43.8 mm) despite of having lower mPAP values (patient a - mPAP of 57 mmHg; patient b - mPAP of 75 mmHg)
Fig. 2Distribution of MPAD according to diagnosis
Fig. 3Correlation between MPAD and mPAP