J Jia1, Y Cui1, M Lu2, X Wang2, Jie Li2, Jian Li2, Y Li2, X Zhang3, J Gao2, J Zhou2, Z Lu2, J Gong2, J Yu1, Z Sun1, C Liu1, L Shen2, X Zhang3. 1. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), The VIP-II Gastrointestinal Cancer Division of Medical Department, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, 100142, Beijing, China. 2. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), The Gastrointestinal Department, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China. 3. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), The VIP-II Gastrointestinal Cancer Division of Medical Department, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, 100142, Beijing, China. zhangxd0829@163.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the predominant pathological type and accounts for more than 80 % of esophageal cancer in China. The successful use of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma provides the rationale for introducing anti-EGFR targeting treatment in ESCC. One of our prospective phase II clinical trials analyzed the efficacy of nimotuzumab, an anti-EGFR agent, combined with chemotherapy (paclitaxel and cisplatin) to treat unresectable ESCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the correlation of the clinical response with EGFR expression by immunohistochemical staining (IHC). RESULTS: Totally 55 tumor samples were analyzed. 18/55 (32.7 %) cases were with high EGFR expression while the other 37/55 (67.3 %) cases were with low to moderate EGFR expression. The expression of EGFR was not related to gender, age, tumor location, tumor differentiation and clinical stage of disease. The objective response rate (ORR) in high EGFR expression group was 55.6 % (10/18) while that in low to moderate EGFR expression group was 54.1 % (20/37) (P = 0.57). Both the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in high EGFR expression group were much shorter than those in low to moderate EGFR expression group (PFS: 5.8 ± 0.5 vs. 11.0 ± 2.8 months, P = 0.007; OS: 9.7 ± 0.5 vs. 21.5 ± 1.5 months, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that over-expression of EGFR was related to poor survival of ESCC. The over-expression of EGFR by IHC might not be an ideal predictive biomarker of nimotuzumab treatment. Other EGFR pathway-associated molecules should be analyzed in further studies.
INTRODUCTION: The esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the predominant pathological type and accounts for more than 80 % of esophageal cancer in China. The successful use of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma provides the rationale for introducing anti-EGFR targeting treatment in ESCC. One of our prospective phase II clinical trials analyzed the efficacy of nimotuzumab, an anti-EGFR agent, combined with chemotherapy (paclitaxel and cisplatin) to treat unresectable ESCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the correlation of the clinical response with EGFR expression by immunohistochemical staining (IHC). RESULTS: Totally 55 tumor samples were analyzed. 18/55 (32.7 %) cases were with high EGFR expression while the other 37/55 (67.3 %) cases were with low to moderate EGFR expression. The expression of EGFR was not related to gender, age, tumor location, tumor differentiation and clinical stage of disease. The objective response rate (ORR) in high EGFR expression group was 55.6 % (10/18) while that in low to moderate EGFR expression group was 54.1 % (20/37) (P = 0.57). Both the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in high EGFR expression group were much shorter than those in low to moderate EGFR expression group (PFS: 5.8 ± 0.5 vs. 11.0 ± 2.8 months, P = 0.007; OS: 9.7 ± 0.5 vs. 21.5 ± 1.5 months, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that over-expression of EGFR was related to poor survival of ESCC. The over-expression of EGFR by IHC might not be an ideal predictive biomarker of nimotuzumab treatment. Other EGFR pathway-associated molecules should be analyzed in further studies.
Authors: David H Ilson; David Kelsen; Manish Shah; Gary Schwartz; Douglas A Levine; Jeff Boyd; Marinela Capanu; Benjamin Miron; David Klimstra Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Thomas Crosby; Christopher N Hurt; Stephen Falk; Simon Gollins; Somnath Mukherjee; John Staffurth; Ruby Ray; Nadim Bashir; John A Bridgewater; J Ian Geh; David Cunningham; Jane Blazeby; Rajarshi Roy; Tim Maughan; Gareth Griffiths Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Tom Waddell; Ian Chau; David Cunningham; David Gonzalez; Alicia Frances Clare Okines; Alicia Frances; Clare Okines; Andrew Wotherspoon; Claire Saffery; Gary Middleton; Jonathan Wadsley; David Ferry; Wasat Mansoor; Tom Crosby; Fareeda Coxon; David Smith; Justin Waters; Timothy Iveson; Stephen Falk; Sarah Slater; Clare Peckitt; Yolanda Barbachano Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: L Gibault; J-P Metges; V Conan-Charlet; P Lozac'h; M Robaszkiewicz; C Bessaguet; N Lagarde; A Volant Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-07-11 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Ming Bai; Meng Wang; Ting Deng; Yuxian Bai; Kai Zang; Zhanhui Miao; Wenlin Gai; Liangzhi Xie; Yi Ba Journal: Cancer Biol Med Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 4.248