Literature DB >> 26459179

Inactivation of Hippo Pathway Is Significantly Associated with Poor Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Bo Hwa Sohn1, Jae-Jun Shim2, Sang-Bae Kim1, Kyu Yun Jang3, Soo Mi Kim4, Ji Hoon Kim5, Jun Eul Hwang1, Hee-Jin Jang1, Hyun-Sung Lee1, Sang-Cheol Kim6, Woojin Jeong7, Sung Soo Kim8, Eun Sung Park9, Jeonghoon Heo10, Yoon Jun Kim11, Dae-Ghon Kim12, Sun-Hee Leem13, Ahmed Kaseb14, Manal M Hassan14, Minse Cha15, In-Sun Chu16, Randy L Johnson17, Yun-Yong Park18, Ju-Seog Lee19.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Hippo pathway is a tumor suppressor in the liver. However, the clinical significance of Hippo pathway inactivation in HCC is not clearly defined. We analyzed genomic data from human and mouse tissues to determine clinical relevance of Hippo pathway inactivation in HCC. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We analyzed gene expression data from Mst1/2(-/-) and Sav1(-/-) mice and identified a 610-gene expression signature reflecting Hippo pathway inactivation in the liver [silence of Hippo (SOH) signature]. By integrating gene expression data from mouse models with those from human HCC tissues, we developed a prediction model that could identify HCC patients with an inactivated Hippo pathway and used it to test its significance in HCC patients, via univariate and multivariate Cox analyses.
RESULTS: HCC patients (National Cancer Institute cohort, n = 113) with the SOH signature had a significantly poorer prognosis than those without the SOH signature [P < 0.001 for overall survival (OS)]. The significant association of the signature with poor prognosis was further validated in the Korean (n = 100, P = 0.006 for OS) and Fudan University cohorts (n = 242, P = 0.001 for OS). On multivariate analysis, the signature was an independent predictor of recurrence-free survival (HR, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.28: P = 0.008). We also demonstrated significant concordance between the SOH HCC subtype and the hepatic stem cell HCC subtype that had been identified in a previous study (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Inactivation of the Hippo pathway in HCC is significantly associated with poor prognosis. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26459179      PMCID: PMC5536176          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  36 in total

1.  Focal gains of VEGFA and molecular classification of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Derek Y Chiang; Augusto Villanueva; Yujin Hoshida; Judit Peix; Philippa Newell; Beatriz Minguez; Amanda C LeBlanc; Diana J Donovan; Swan N Thung; Manel Solé; Victoria Tovar; Clara Alsinet; Alex H Ramos; Jordi Barretina; Sasan Roayaie; Myron Schwartz; Samuel Waxman; Jordi Bruix; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Azra H Ligon; Vesna Najfeld; Scott L Friedman; William R Sellers; Matthew Meyerson; Josep M Llovet
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Hippo signaling in organ size control.

Authors:  Duojia Pan
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Transcriptome classification of HCC is related to gene alterations and to new therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Sandrine Boyault; David S Rickman; Aurélien de Reyniès; Charles Balabaud; Sandra Rebouissou; Emmanuelle Jeannot; Aurélie Hérault; Jean Saric; Jacques Belghiti; Dominique Franco; Paulette Bioulac-Sage; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Jessica Zucman-Rossi
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  A unique metastasis gene signature enables prediction of tumor relapse in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Stephanie Roessler; Hu-Liang Jia; Anuradha Budhu; Marshonna Forgues; Qing-Hai Ye; Ju-Seog Lee; Snorri S Thorgeirsson; Zhongtang Sun; Zhao-You Tang; Lun-Xiu Qin; Xin Wei Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Prognostic gene expression signature associated with two molecularly distinct subtypes of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sang Cheul Oh; Yun-Yong Park; Eun Sung Park; Jae Yun Lim; Soo Mi Kim; Sang-Bae Kim; Jongseung Kim; Sang Cheol Kim; In-Sun Chu; J Joshua Smith; R Daniel Beauchamp; Timothy J Yeatman; Scott Kopetz; Ju-Seog Lee
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  YAP1 increases organ size and expands undifferentiated progenitor cells.

Authors:  Fernando D Camargo; Sumita Gokhale; Jonathan B Johnnidis; Dongdong Fu; George W Bell; Rudolf Jaenisch; Thijn R Brummelkamp
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Mst1 and Mst2 maintain hepatocyte quiescence and suppress hepatocellular carcinoma development through inactivation of the Yap1 oncogene.

Authors:  Dawang Zhou; Claudius Conrad; Fan Xia; Ji-Sun Park; Bernhard Payer; Yi Yin; Gregory Y Lauwers; Wolfgang Thasler; Jeannie T Lee; Joseph Avruch; Nabeel Bardeesy
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Gene expression in fixed tissues and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yujin Hoshida; Augusto Villanueva; Masahiro Kobayashi; Judit Peix; Derek Y Chiang; Amy Camargo; Supriya Gupta; Jamie Moore; Matthew J Wrobel; Jim Lerner; Michael Reich; Jennifer A Chan; Jonathan N Glickman; Kenji Ikeda; Masaji Hashimoto; Goro Watanabe; Maria G Daidone; Sasan Roayaie; Myron Schwartz; Swan Thung; Helga B Salvesen; Stacey Gabriel; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Jordi Bruix; Scott L Friedman; Hiromitsu Kumada; Josep M Llovet; Todd R Golub
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A random variance model for detection of differential gene expression in small microarray experiments.

Authors:  George W Wright; Richard M Simon
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Reconstruction of nuclear receptor network reveals that NR2E3 is a novel upstream regulator of ESR1 in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yun-Yong Park; Kyounghyun Kim; Sang-Bae Kim; Bryan T Hennessy; Soo Mi Kim; Eun Sung Park; Jae Yun Lim; Jane Li; Yiling Lu; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Woojin Jeong; Gordon B Mills; Stephen Safe; Ju-Seog Lee
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 12.137

View more
  51 in total

1.  SAV1 represses the development of human colorectal cancer by regulating the Akt-mTOR pathway in a YAP-dependent manner.

Authors:  Jianwu Jiang; Wei Chang; Yang Fu; Yongshun Gao; Chunlin Zhao; Xiefu Zhang; Shuijun Zhang
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.831

2.  Hippo-mediated suppression of IRS2/AKT signaling prevents hepatic steatosis and liver cancer.

Authors:  Sun-Hye Jeong; Han-Byul Kim; Min-Chul Kim; Ji-Min Lee; Jae Ho Lee; Jeong-Hwan Kim; Jin-Woo Kim; Woong-Yang Park; Seon-Young Kim; Jae Bum Kim; Haeryoung Kim; Jin-Man Kim; Hueng-Sik Choi; Dae-Sik Lim
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  The Hippo Pathway and YAP Signaling: Emerging Concepts in Regulation, Signaling, and Experimental Targeting Strategies With Implications for Hepatobiliary Malignancies.

Authors:  Nathan Werneburg; Gregory J Gores; Rory L Smoot
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2019-06-28

Review 4.  Hippo-YAP signaling in digestive system tumors.

Authors:  Feng Yin; Jixin Dong; Liang-I Kang; Xiuli Liu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 5.  Hippo Signaling in the Liver Regulates Organ Size, Cell Fate, and Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Sachin H Patel; Fernando D Camargo; Dean Yimlamai
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Platelets reduce anoikis and promote metastasis by activating YAP1 signaling.

Authors:  Monika Haemmerle; Morgan L Taylor; Tony Gutschner; Sunila Pradeep; Min Soon Cho; Jianting Sheng; Yasmin M Lyons; Archana S Nagaraja; Robert L Dood; Yunfei Wen; Lingegowda S Mangala; Jean M Hansen; Rajesha Rupaimoole; Kshipra M Gharpure; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; Sun Young Yim; Ju-Seog Lee; Cristina Ivan; Wei Hu; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Stephen T Wong; Beth Y Karlan; Douglas A Levine; Jinsong Liu; Vahid Afshar-Kharghan; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Epigenetic restriction of Hippo signaling by MORC2 underlies stemness of hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Zhong-Yi Qin; Liang-Zhi Wen; Yan Guo; Qin Liu; Zeng-Jie Lei; Wei Pan; Kai-Jun Liu; Xing-Wei Wang; Shu-Jie Lai; Wen-Jing Sun; Yan-Ling Wei; Lei Liu; Ling Guo; Yu-Qin Chen; Jun Wang; Hua-Liang Xiao; Xiu-Wu Bian; Dong-Feng Chen; Bin Wang
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 15.828

8.  Metabolic network-based stratification of hepatocellular carcinoma reveals three distinct tumor subtypes.

Authors:  Gholamreza Bidkhori; Rui Benfeitas; Martina Klevstig; Cheng Zhang; Jens Nielsen; Mathias Uhlen; Jan Boren; Adil Mardinoglu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Hippo Cascade Controls Lineage Commitment of Liver Tumors in Mice and Humans.

Authors:  Shanshan Zhang; Jingxiao Wang; Haichuan Wang; Lingling Fan; Biao Fan; Billy Zeng; Junyan Tao; Xiaolei Li; Li Che; Antonio Cigliano; Silvia Ribback; Frank Dombrowski; Bin Chen; Wenming Cong; Lixin Wei; Diego F Calvisi; Xin Chen
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Development and Validation of a Six-Gene Recurrence Risk Score Assay for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Keun-Wook Lee; Sung Sook Lee; Jun-Eul Hwang; Hee-Jin Jang; Hyun-Sung Lee; Sang Cheul Oh; Sang Ho Lee; Bo Hwa Sohn; Sang Bae Kim; Jae-Jun Shim; Woojin Jeong; Minse Cha; Jae-Ho Cheong; Jae Yong Cho; Jae Yun Lim; Eun Sung Park; Sang Cheol Kim; Yoon-Koo Kang; Sung Hoon Noh; Jaffer A Ajani; Ju-Seog Lee
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.