| Literature DB >> 26459001 |
Zsofia K Nemeth1, Nicoleta G Mardare2, Maria E Czira3, Gyorgy Deak1, Istvan Kiss4,5,6, Zoltan Mathe7, Adam Remport7, Akos Ujszaszi8, Adrian Covic9, Miklos Z Molnar10, Istvan Mucsi11.
Abstract
Pulse pressure (PP) reflects increased large artery stiffness, which is caused, in part, by arterial calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease. PP has been shown to predict both cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in various patient populations, including kidney transplant (KTX) recipients. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a marker and regulator of arterial calcification, and it is related to cardiovascular survival in hemodialysis patients. Here we tested the hypothesis that OPG is associated with increased pulse pressure. We cross-sectionally analyzed the association between serum OPG and PP in a prevalent cohort of 969 KTX patients (mean age: 51 +/- --13 years, 57% male, 21% diabetics, mean eGFR 51 +/- 20 ml/min/1.73 m2). Independent associations were tested in a linear regression model adjusted for multiple covariables. PP was positively correlated with serum OPG (rho = 0.284, p < 0.001). Additionally, a positive correlation was seen between PP versus age (r = 0.358, p < 0.001), the Charlson Comorbidity Index (r = 0.232, p < 0.001), serum glucose (r = 0.172, p < 0.001), BMI (r = 0.133, p = 0.001) and serum cholesterol (r = 0.094, p = 0.003). PP was negatively correlated with serum Ca, albumin and eGFR. The association between PP and OPG remained significant after adjusting for multiple potentially relevant covariables (beta = 0.143, p < 0.001). We conclude that serum OPG is independently associated with pulse pressure in kidney transplant recipients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26459001 PMCID: PMC4602220 DOI: 10.1038/srep14518
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic and biochemical data for all participants and for tertiles of serum OPG (data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median with interquartile range (IQR) or n[%] as appropriate).
| Total sample(n = 969) | Tertiles of serum OPG (pmol/L) | p fortrend | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st(<3.20) | 2nd(3.20–4.39) | 3rd(>4.39) | |||
| Pulse pressure (mmHg) | 58 ± 17 | 53 ± 14 | 57 ± 17 | 63 ± 18 | <0.001 |
| Age (years) | 51 ± 13 | 44 ± 13 | 51 ± 12 | 57 ± 10 | <0.001 |
| Sex (male) | 559 (57) | 198 (63) | 191 (58) | 173 (52) | 0.02 |
| Charlson Comorbidity Index | 2 (2) | 2 (1) | 2 (2) | 3 (2) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus (yes) | 206 (21) | 39 (12) | 78 (24) | 89 (27) | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.9 ± 4.8 | 27.4 ± 5 | 27.1 ± 4.8 | 26.5 ± 4.7 | 0.015 |
| Tx vintage (months) | 72 (75) | 64.5 (82) | 76 (74) | 76 (71) | 0.022 |
| ESKD vintage (months) | 107.5 (87) | 100 (90) | 108 (89) | 113 (93) | 0.003 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 142 ± 19 | 138 ± 18 | 141 ± 19 | 147 ± 20 | <0.001 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 84 ± 12 | 85 ± 12 | 83 ± 12 | 83 ± 12 | 0.073 |
| Steroids (yes) | 787 (81) | 255 (78) | 266 (81) | 277 (85) | 0.070 |
| CSA (yes) | 469 (48) | 145 (44) | 160 (49) | 172 (53) | 0.088 |
| Tacrolimus (yes) | 418 (43) | 164 (50) | 136 (42) | 122 (37) | 0.003 |
| MMF (yes) | 755 (78) | 269 (82) | 257 (79) | 240 (73) | 0.029 |
| Sirolimus (yes) | 78 (8) | 16 (5) | 23 (7) | 39 (12) | 0.003 |
| CKD-EPI eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 53 ± 22 | 60 ± 21 | 54 ± 20 | 44 ± 22 | <0.001 |
| Albumin (g/l) | 40 ± 4 | 41 ± 4 | 40 ± 4 | 39 ± 4 | <0.001 |
| Blood glucose (mmol/l) | 6.6 ± 2.6 | 6.3 ± 2.4 | 6.8 ± 2.8 | 6.6 ± 2.4 | 0.037 |
| CRP (mg/l) | 3.1 (5.3) | 2.9 (4.7) | 3.4 (5.4) | 3.2 (5.7) | 0.25 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/l) | 5.51 ± 1.27 | 5.36 ± 1.14 | 5.63 ± 1.32 | 5.54 ± 1.34 | 0.069 |
| Trigliceride (mmol/l) | 2.08 (1.29) | 1.71 (1.42) | 1.69 (1.31) | 1.68 (1.19) | 0.917 |
| Phosphorus (mmol/l) | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.001 |
| Ca (mmol/l) | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 0.427 |
| Ca*P (mmol2/l2) | 2.5 ± 0.6 | 2.4 ± 0.7 | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.6 | <0.001 |
| PTH (pg/ml) | 67 (56) | 62 (47) | 69 (54) | 75 (75) | <0.001 |
| Alkaline phosphatase(UI/l) | 88 ± 40 | 85 ± 31 | 86 ± 34 | 94 ± 50 | 0.005 |
| Osteoprotegerin(pmol/l) | 3.9 ± 1.5 | 2.4 ± 0.53 | 3.7 ± 0.35 | 5.6 ± 0.11 | <0.001 |
Correlation between PP and OPG versus clinical and laboratory variables.
| PP (mmHg) | Osteoprotegerin(pmol/l) | |
|---|---|---|
| Osteoprotegerin (pmol/l) | R = 0.284 | NA |
| p < 0.001 | ||
| Pulse pressure (mmHg) | NA | R = 0.284 |
| p < 0.001 | ||
| Age (years) | R = 0.385 | R = 0.419 |
| p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | |
| Charlson Comorbidity Index | R = 0.232 | R = 0.250 |
| p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | R = 0.133 | R = −0.079 |
| p < 0. 001 | p = 0.014 | |
| Tx vintage (months) | R = −0.006 | R = 0.087 |
| p = 0.845 | p = 0.006 | |
| Cumulative ESKD vintage (months) | R = −0.023 | R = 0.107 |
| p = 0.482 | p = 0.001 | |
| eGFR | R = −0.105 | R = −0.290 |
| P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | |
| Hemoglobin (g/l) | R = −0.095 | R = −0.160 |
| p = 0.003 | p < 0.001 | |
| CRP (mg/l) | R = 0.072 | R = 0.023 |
| p = 0.025 | p = 0.465 | |
| se Albumin (g/l) | R = −0.134 | R = −0.230 |
| p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | |
| se Cholesterol (mmol/l) | R = 0.094 | R = 0.041 |
| p = 0.003 | p = 0.199 | |
| se Glucose (mmol/l) | R = 0.172 | R = 0.037 |
| p < 0.001 | p = 0.244 | |
| se Calcium (corrected for albumin) (mmol/l) | R = −0.122 | R = −0.104 |
| p < 0.001 | p = 0.001 | |
| se Phosphorus (mmol/l) | R = 0.031 | R = 0.144 |
| p = 0.328 | p < 0.001 | |
| Ca x P (mmol2/l2) | R = −0.022 | R = 0.145 |
| p = 498 | p < 0.001 | |
| Se ALP (U/l) | R = 0.002 | R = 0.107 |
| p = 0.948 | p = 0.001 | |
| Se PTH (pg/ml) | R = 0.016 | R = 0.075 |
| p = 0.616 | p = 0.019 |
Figure 1Non-linear association between OPG versus PP using restricted cubic spline.
The model was adjusted according to model E in Table 3.
Multivariable linear regression model of pulse pressure as dependent variable to assess the independent association with serum OPG.
| serum OPG | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| beta | P Value | R square | |
| model A | 0.284 | <0.001 | 0.081 |
| model B | 0.152 | <0.001 | 0.209 |
| model C | 0.152 | <0.001 | 0.216 |
| model D | 0.141 | <0.001 | 0.224 |
| model E | 0.143 | <0.001 | 0.233 |
Shown in the cells are the parameters of the independent variable serum OPG.
Independent variables entered into the model: Block A: serum OPG alone; Block B: Block A + age, sex, presence of diabetes, BMI, the Charlson Comorbidity Index and cumulative ESKD vintage; Block C: Block B + use of immunosuppressive medications (steroids, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate-mofetil and sirolimus); Block D: Block C + eGFR, serum albumin, glucose and cholesterine; Block E: Block D + calcium, phosphorus, PTH, use of active vitamin D, use of PO4 binders. Abbreviations: OPG – Osteoprotegerin.
Multivariable regression analysis for PP (R2 = 0.233, p < 0.001). Shown in the table are variables which were independently associated with PP.
| B | StandardizedCoefficients | p value | 95% ConfidenceInterval for B | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | LowerBound | UpperBound | |||
| Se OPG | 1.636 | 0.143 | <0.001 | 0.865 | 2.407 |
| Age | 0.342 | 0.259 | <0.001 | 0.251 | 0.434 |
| Gender | −3.968 | −0.116 | <0.001 | −6.006 | −1.930 |
| Presence of diabetes | 2.874 | 0.070 | 0.044 | 0.080 | 5.668 |
| Charlson Comorbidity Index | 0.913 | 0.093 | 0.005 | 0.271 | 1.555 |
| Cumulative ESKD vintage | −0.016 | −0.062 | 0.053 | −0.033 | 0.000 |
| Taking Cyclosporin A | 3.749 | 0.111 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 7.451 |
| Se Ca | −10.361 | −0.094 | 0.004 | −17.400 | −3.321 |
The final model was also adjusted for the following variables: BMI, use of steroids, tacrolimus, azathioprine, sirolimus and mycophenolate-mofetil, eGFR, se Albumin, phosphorus, glucose and PTH.