Literature DB >> 26458997

Variations in gestational length and preterm delivery by race, ethnicity and migration.

Ingvil K Sørbye1, Susitha Wanigaratne2, Marcelo L Urquia3.   

Abstract

Preterm delivery rates within industrialized countries have been reported to vary according to the parents' race, ethnicity and migrant status; however, such disparities are poorly understood. In this paper, the available evidence and potential clinical significance of racial/ethnic and migrant disparities in gestational length and preterm delivery are assessed alongside potential explanatory factors. Although measurement bias in gestational length has the potential to inflate disparities, there is a consistently higher risk of preterm birth among some racial/ethnic groups. These differences most likely reflect lasting socio-economic disadvantage and discrimination rather than genetic mechanisms. The effect of migrant status is less conclusive due to heterogeneity of populations and the healthy migrant effect; however, environmental influences in the receiving country are implicated in driving increases of overall preterm rates. When assessing preterm delivery rates across ethnic and migrant groups, the use of standardized, ultrasound-based pregnancy dating methods is crucial to minimize bias. Current evidence does not justify the provision of a different clinical care approach to minority or immigrant women solely based on their race, ethnicity or country of origin; however, these labels may serve as flags for further inquiry on individual risk factors and a detailed obstetric history.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethnicity; gestational length; migration; minority groups; preterm delivery; race

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26458997     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 1521-6934            Impact factor:   5.237


  5 in total

1.  Disproportionate Preterm Delivery Among Black Women: a State-Level Analysis.

Authors:  Palmira Santos; Gitanjali Joglekar; Kristen Faughnan; Jennifer Darden; Ann Hendrich
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-11-25

2.  Spatial identification of environmental health hazards potentially associated with adverse birth outcomes.

Authors:  Alina Svechkina; Boris A Portnov
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Ethnic differences in singleton preterm birth in England and Wales, 2006-12: Analysis of national routinely collected data.

Authors:  Yangmei Li; Maria A Quigley; Alison Macfarlane; Hiranthi Jayaweera; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Jennifer Hollowell
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  Project20: Does continuity of care and community-based antenatal care improve maternal and neonatal birth outcomes for women with social risk factors? A prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Hannah Rayment-Jones; Kathryn Dalrymple; James Harris; Angela Harden; Elidh Parslow; Thomas Georgi; Jane Sandall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Preterm disparities between foreign and Swedish born mothers depend on the method used to estimate gestational age. A Swedish population-based register study.

Authors:  Sol P Juárez; Marcelo L Urquia; Eleonora Mussino; Can Liu; Yao Qiao; Anders Hjern
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.