| Literature DB >> 26458397 |
Pi-Jung Hsiao1,2, Mei-Yueh Lee3, Yeng-Tseng Wang4, He-Jiun Jiang5, Pi-Chen Lin6, Yi-Hsin Connie Yang7, Kung-Kai Kuo8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) works to lipidate and assemble the apoB-containing lipoproteins in liver. It closely links up the hepatic secretion of lipid to regulate serum lipid and atherosclerosis. Cases of MTTP gene mutation is characterized by abetalipoproteinemia and remarkable hepatic steatosis or cirrhosis. Several MTTP polymorphisms have been reported relating to metabolic syndrome, hyperlipidemia and steatohepatitis. We supposed the regulation of serum lipids and risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) formation may be modified by individual susceptibility related to the MTTP polymorphisms. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26458397 PMCID: PMC4603340 DOI: 10.1186/s12881-015-0242-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Distribution of MTTP genotypes
| NCBI references | Gene polymorphisms | Allele change | Genotypes | Distribution (numbers, %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs1800591 | (promoter) G-493T | G/T | GG: GT: TT | 882: 273:29 (74.5 %: 23.1 %: 2.4 %) |
| rs2306986 | E98D | G/C | GG: GC: CC | 809: 318: 25 (70.2 %: 27.6 %: 2.2 %) |
| rs3816873 | I128T | T/C | TT: TC: CC | 878: 270: 26 (74.8 %: 23.0 %: 2.2 %) |
| rs3792683 | N166S | A/G | AA: AG: GG | 818: 327: 24 (70.0 %: 28.0 %: 2.0 %) |
| rs2306985 | Q297H | G/C | GG: GC:CC | 414: 566: 193 (35.3 %: 48.3 %: 16.4 %) |
Genotype distribution was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium tested by chi-square test
Fig. 1Haplotype block map for five common MTTP polymorphisms. Top plot: The linkage disequilibrium between two SNPs is standardized as D’. The dark grey cells indicate strong linkage disequilibrium among these SNPs. Bottom plot: The gray-scale spectrum (from left to right) indicates pairwise r 2 (%) values ranging from black (r 2 = 1) to white (r 2 = 0)
Comparison of the serum cholesterol, LDL-C and non-HDL-C with MTTP genotypes
| Genotype | Cholesterol (mg/dl) |
| LDL (mg/dl) |
| Non-HDL (mg/dl) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (promoter) G-493T | ||||||
| GG+GT ( | 180.7 ± 32.4 | 0.576 | 123.1 ± 33.1 | 0.391 | 129.3 ± 32.5 | 0.694 |
| TT ( | 184.1 ± 28.1 | 129.8 ± 29.7 | 132.3 ± 23.5 | |||
| Glu98Asp (E98D) | ||||||
| GG+GC ( | 180.5 ± 31.9 | 0.551 | 123.2 ± 33.0 | 0.566 | 129.2 ± 32.3 | 0.719 |
| CC ( | 184.3 ± 28.5 | 127.7 ± 33.3 | 132.0 ± 2.7 | |||
| Iler128Thr (I128T) | ||||||
| TT+TC ( | 180.6 ± 32.4 | 0.783 | 123.0 ± 33.1 | 0.384 | 129.3 ± 32.6 | 0.848 |
| CC ( | 182.4 ± 27.3 | 130.3 ± 31.6 | 130.9 ± 24.6 | |||
| Asn166Ser (N166S) | ||||||
| AA+AG ( | 180.5 ± 32.2 | 0.489 | 122.9 ± 32.9 | 0.362 | 129.1 ± 32.4 | 0.543 |
| GG ( | 185.1 ± 29.2 | 130.1 ± 33.9 | 133.8 ± 27.9 | |||
| Gln297His (Q297H) | ||||||
| GG+GC ( | 180.9 ± 32.6 | 0.433 | 124.1 ± 33.7 | 0.047* | 129.9 ± 33.1 | 0.282 |
| CC ( | 179.0 ± 29.6 | 118.5 ± 28.8 | 126.6 ± 28.4 | |||
Data are shown as mean ± SD. Independent t test was used for statistical analysis. (* P < 0.05 indicates significant)
Comparison of the metabolic parameters with MTTP genotypes
| Genotype | BMI (kg/m2) |
| TG (mg/dl) |
| HOMA-IR |
| Adipo-IR |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (promoter) G-493T | ||||||||
| GG+GT ( | 24.5 ± 3.3 | 0.527 | 138.3 ± 123.9 | 0.039* | 1.09 ± 2.29 | 0.572 | 2.46 ± 3.84 | 0.014* |
| TT ( | 24.7 ± 2.5 | 117.1 ± 49.7 | 0.83 ± 0.72 | 1.61 ± 1.32 | ||||
| Glu98Asp (E98D) | ||||||||
| GG+GC ( | 24.5 ± 3.3 | 0.050* | 137.0 ± 120.9 | 0.001* | 1.09 ± 2.31 | 0.044* | 2.48 ± 3.87 | 0.436 |
| CC ( | 22.6 ± 2.3 | 101.3 ± 43.2 | 0.61 ± 1.02 | 1.78 ± 2.98 | ||||
| Ile128Thr (I128T) | ||||||||
| TT+TC ( | 24.5 ± 3.3 | 0.640 | 138.1 ± 123.6 | 0.040* | 1.08 ± 2.29 | 0.140 | 2.46 ± 3.86 | 0.017* |
| CC ( | 24.8 ± 2.6 | 114.9 ± 51.9 | 0.833 ± 0.75 | 1.57 ± 1.38 | ||||
| Asn166Ser (N166S) | ||||||||
| AA+AG ( | 24.5 ± 3.3 | 0.006* | 138.6 ± 123.9 | 0.001* | 1.05 ± 1.92 | 0.301 | 2.43 ± 2.75 | 0.442 |
| GG ( | 22.7 ± 2.3 | 102.8 ± 44.3 | 0.62 ± 1.04 | 1.77 ± 2.98 | ||||
| Gln297His (Q297H) | ||||||||
| GG+GC ( | 24.5 ± 3.4 | 0.913 | 136.9 ± 124.1 | 0.656 | 1.09 ± 2.43 | 0.451 | 0.57 ± 0.23 | 0.337 |
| CC ( | 24.5 ± 2.9 | 141.2 ± 116.2 | 0.92 ± 0.98 | 0.58 ± 0.25 | ||||
Data are shown as mean ± SD
Independent t test was used for statistical analysis of body mass index (BMI) and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR and Adipo-IR)
Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze triglyceride (TG). (* P < 0.05 indicates significant)
Risk impact and interaction of the MTTP genotypes on serum LDL-C
| Independent variables | Parameter estimates (B) | 95 % Confidence interval |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower vs Upper bound | ||||
| Age | 0.430 | 0.150 | 0.710 | 0.003* |
| Sex (male vs female) | −7.279 | −43.699 | 29.141 | 0.695 |
| BMI | 1.448 | 0.636 | 2.261 | <0.0001* |
| HOMA-IR | −1.189 | −3.543 | 1.166 | 0.322 |
| Adipo-IR | 1.414 | −0.168 | 2.996 | 0.080 |
| E98D (CC vs GG+GC) | −32.004 | −96.849 | 32.840 | 0.333 |
| I128T (CC vs TT+TC) | 12.878 | −7.070 | 32.827 | 0.205 |
| N166S (GG vs AA+AG) | 35.276 | −27.455 | 98.007 | 0.270 |
| Q297H (CC vs GG+GC) | −10.802 | −17.822 | −3.782 | 0.003* |
Multiple linear regression analysis was applied using serum LDL-C as dependent variable adjusted by age, sex, BMI, HOMA-IR, Adipo-IR and MTTP genotypes based on significance in univariate analysis and regression models. (*P < 0.05 indicates significant)
Risk impact and interaction of the MTTP genotypes on serum non-HDL-C
| Independent variables | Parameter estimates (B) | 95 % Confidence interval |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower vs Upper bound | ||||
| Age | 0.510 | 0.247 | 0.772 | <0.0001* |
| Sex (male vs female) | −9.122 | −43.247 | 25.035 | 0.6006 |
| BMI | 1.343 | 0.581 | 2.105 | 0.0011* |
| HOMA-IR | −4.397 | −6.606 | −2.189 | <0.0001* |
| Adipo-IR | 4.157 | 2.673 | 5.641 | <0.0001* |
| E98D (CC vs GG+GC) | −23.150 | −83.966 | 37.666 | 0.455 |
| I128T (CC vs TT+TC) | 6.400 | −12.309 | 25.110 | 0.502 |
| N166S (GG vs AA+AG) | 23.984 | −34.850 | 82.818 | 0.424 |
| Q297H (CC vs GG+GC) | −6.802 | −13.386 | −0.218 | 0.043* |
Multiple linear regression analysis was applied using serum non-HDL-C as dependent variable adjusted by age, sex, BMI, HOMA-IR, Adipo-IR and MTTP genotypes based on significance in univariate analysis and regression models. (*P < 0.05 indicates significant)
Risk impact and interaction of the MTTP genotypes on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)
| Independent variables | Odds ratio (95 % confidence interval) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.991 (0.973–1.009) | 0.313 |
| Sex | 1.252 (0.071–21.976) | 0.878 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 1.370 (1.288–1.457) | <0.0001* |
| HOMA-IR | 0.895 (0.694–1.154) | 0.391 |
| Adipo-IR index | 1.266 (1.175–1.365) | <0.0001* |
| Promoter (TT vs GG+GT) | 0.588 (0.194–1.785) | 0.349 |
| E98D (CC vs GG+GC) | 0.711 (0.040–12.723) | 0.816 |
| N166S (GG vs AA+AG) | 1.028 (0.057–18.483) | 0.985 |
| Q297H (CC vs GG+GC) | 1.682 (1.102–2.568) | 0.016* |
Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied using NAFLD as a dependent variable adjusted by age, sex, BMI, HOMA-IR, Adipo-IR and MTTP genotypes based on significance in univariate analysis and regression models. (*P < 0.05 indicates significant)
Fig. 2Predicted molecular modelling structure and potential energy plots of the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP). a 297H amino acid resides at the end of β-barrel shown in a ball/stick model. b The potential energy for MTP in Tip3 water molecules demonstrated higher free energy and a less stable structure for 297H vs Q297