Literature DB >> 26457851

Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: An Analysis of Different Techniques.

Beri M Ridgeway1, Megan Buechel, Benjamin Nutter, Tommaso Falcone.   

Abstract

To compare conventional minimally invasive (MIS) approaches and newer technology approaches in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease. PubMed was searched for all pertinent randomized-controlled trials (RCTs). Selected outcomes were compared using standard meta-analysis methods. Three RCTs compared conventional MIS to robotic-assisted hysterectomy and 5 RCTs compared conventional laparoscopy to single-incision hysterectomy. There were no significant differences in outcomes. A subanalysis comparing conventional to robotic-assisted laparoscopy found an association between conventional laparoscopy and shorter operative time. Newer technology approaches do not confer an advantage over conventional MIS approaches in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26457851     DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   2.190


  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomies and of abdominal hysterectomies: a case study of 4,895 patients in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.

Authors:  Hongying He; Zhijun Yang; Dingyuan Zeng; Jiangtao Fan; Xiaoxia Hu; Yuan Ye; Hua Bai; Yanming Jiang; Zhong Lin; Zhiying Lei; Xinlin Li; Lian Li; Jinghua Gan; Ying Lan; Xiongzhi Tang; Danxia Wang; Junsong Jiang; Xiaoyan Wu; Meiying Li; Xiaoqing Ren; Xiaomin Yang; Mei Liu; Qinmei Wang; Fuyan Jiang; Li Li
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.087

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.