Literature DB >> 26456745

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients With BMI >50: Single Surgeon Outcomes and Feasibility.

Necole M Streeper1, Andrew C Radtke2, Kristina L Penniston2, John C McDermott3, Stephen Y Nakada2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and technical approach in the super obese population (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 50).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 31 consecutive PNL cases with a BMI > 50 from a single surgeon (SYN) from 1995 to 2013. Procedures were performed in the prone position, and upper pole access was used. Operative time, length of hospital stay, stone burden, complication rates, and stone-free rates were measured.
RESULTS: Of the 31 patients who underwent PNL (age 51.2 ± 12; 71% female), the mean BMI was 59.1 ± 6 kg/m(2) (range 50.4-71.7 kg/m(2)). Mean stone burden was 3.8 cm ± 2. The majority of patients (90.3%) had an upper pole puncture site for access with an operative time of 122.1 ± 75 minutes. The technique was similar to non-obese patients; however, there was a need for extra-long instrumentation. The overall stone-free rate was 71%, with utilization of a second-look PNL in 11 cases. The complication rate, Clavien grade 3 or higher, was 9.7% (3 of 31).
CONCLUSION: PNL is technically feasible, safe, and effective in patients with a BMI ≥ 50. The complication rate, length of hospital stay, and stone-free rate with use of second-look PNL in super obese patients are comparable to severely obese patients. Intervention should not be automatically ruled out or delayed based on the patient's BMI alone.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26456745     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  Comparative study of the treatment of 20-30 mm renal stones with miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy in obese patients.

Authors:  He-Qun Chen; Zhi-Yong Chen; Feng Zeng; Yang Li; Zhong-Qing Yang; Cheng He; Yao He
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Superobese: A Comparison of Outcomes Based on Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Casey A Dauw; Michael S Borofsky; Nadya York; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  A retrospective study comparing super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of 20-30 mm renal stones in obese patients.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Rijin Song; Pei Lu; Minjun Jiang; Guohua Zeng; Wei Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.