Literature DB >> 26456423

Upper limb kinematic differences between breathing and non-breathing conditions in front crawl sprint swimming.

Carla B McCabe1, Ross H Sanders2, Stelios G Psycharakis3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the breathing action in front crawl (FC) sprint swimming affects the ipsilateral upper limb kinematics relative to a non-breathing stroke cycle (SC). Ten male competitive swimmers performed two 25m FC sprints: one breathing to their preferred side (Br) and one not breathing (NBr). Both swim trials were performed through a 6.75m(3) calibrated space and recorded by six gen-locked JVC KY32 CCD cameras. A paired t-test was used to assess statistical differences between the trials, with a confidence level of p<0.05 accepted as significant. Swimmers were slower (3%) when breathing. Within the entry phase, swimmers had a slower COM horizontal velocity (3.3%), less shoulder flexion (8%), abduction (33%) and roll (4%) when breathing. The pull phase was longer in duration (14%) swimmers had a shallower hand path (11%), less shoulder abduction (11%), a slower hand vertical acceleration (30%) and slower centre of mass (COM) horizontal velocity (3%) when breathing. In the push phase, swimmers had a smaller elbow range of motion (ROM) (38%), faster backwards hand speed (25%) and faster hand vertical acceleration (33%) when breathing. Swimmers rolled their shoulders more (12%) in the recovery phase when breathing. This study confirms that swim performance is compromised by the inclusion of taking a breath in sprint FC swimming. It was proposed that swimmers aim to orient their ipsilateral shoulder into a stronger position by stretching and rolling the shoulders more in the entry phase whilst preparing to take a breath. Swimmers should focus on lengthening the push phase by extending the elbow more and not accelerating the hand too quickly upwards when preparing to inhale.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breath-holding; Freestyle swimming; Ipsilateral; Technique; Three-dimensional

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26456423     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  Differences in kinematics and energy cost between front crawl and backstroke below the anaerobic threshold.

Authors:  Tomohiro Gonjo; Carla McCabe; Ana Sousa; João Ribeiro; Ricardo J Fernandes; João Paulo Vilas-Boas; Ross Sanders
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Scapular Dyskinesis in Young, Asymptomatic Elite Swimmers.

Authors:  Jacopo Preziosi Standoli; Francesco Fratalocchi; Vittorio Candela; Tiziano Preziosi Standoli; Giuseppe Giannicola; Marco Bonifazi; Stefano Gumina
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-01-23

3.  Body roll amplitude and timing in backstroke swimming and their differences from front crawl at the same swimming intensities.

Authors:  Tomohiro Gonjo; Ricardo J Fernandes; João Paulo Vilas-Boas; Ross Sanders
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Integrated Timing of Stroking, Breathing, and Kicking in Front-Crawl Swimming: A Novel Stroke-by-Stroke Approach Using Wearable Inertial Sensors.

Authors:  Silvia Fantozzi; Vittorio Coloretti; Maria Francesca Piacentini; Claudio Quagliarotti; Sandro Bartolomei; Giorgio Gatta; Matteo Cortesi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  The Effect of Breathing Laterality on Hip Roll Kinematics in Submaximal Front Crawl Swimming.

Authors:  John M Barden; Mike V Barber
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.