Rita Hwang1, Norman R Morris2, Allison Mandrusiak3, Alison Mudge4, Jessica Suna5, Julie Adsett6, Trevor Russell3. 1. Department of Physiotherapy, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: r.hwang@uq.net.au. 2. Menzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. 3. School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 4. Internal Medicine and Aged Care, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia; School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 5. Internal Medicine Research Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 6. Heart Failure Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The timed up and go test (TUGT) is a short-duration functional test frequently used in rehabilitation settings as a measure of balance and mobility. Reliability and validity for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) has yet to be determined. This prospective cohort study aimed to determine test-retest reliability of the TUGT in patients with CHF, relationships between the TUGT and other variables, including functional tests, and predictors of the TUGT. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a secondary analysis of data collected in a multicenter randomized controlled trial of exercise training in recently hospitalized patients with heart failure (EJECTION-HF). The TUGT was conducted twice at baseline to determine reliability. Assessments were compared with 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), 10-m walk test time, and other clinical variables. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine test-retest reliability and correlations for relationships with other variables. A multiple regression was used to identify predictors of the TUGT. In 278 participants (mean age 62 years), the TUGT demonstrated excellent within-day test-retest reliability (ICC 0.93). A shorter (better) TUGT time was associated with longer 6MWD (r = -0.81; P < .001) and shorter 10-m walk test time (rs = 0.80; P < .001). Best predictors of the TUGT were 6MWD and age, which accounted for 66% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: The TUGT appears to be a reliable and valid functional measurement in patients with CHF. Crown
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The timed up and go test (TUGT) is a short-duration functional test frequently used in rehabilitation settings as a measure of balance and mobility. Reliability and validity for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) has yet to be determined. This prospective cohort study aimed to determine test-retest reliability of the TUGT in patients with CHF, relationships between the TUGT and other variables, including functional tests, and predictors of the TUGT. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a secondary analysis of data collected in a multicenter randomized controlled trial of exercise training in recently hospitalized patients with heart failure (EJECTION-HF). The TUGT was conducted twice at baseline to determine reliability. Assessments were compared with 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), 10-m walk test time, and other clinical variables. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine test-retest reliability and correlations for relationships with other variables. A multiple regression was used to identify predictors of the TUGT. In 278 participants (mean age 62 years), the TUGT demonstrated excellent within-day test-retest reliability (ICC 0.93). A shorter (better) TUGT time was associated with longer 6MWD (r = -0.81; P < .001) and shorter 10-m walk test time (rs = 0.80; P < .001). Best predictors of the TUGT were 6MWD and age, which accounted for 66% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: The TUGT appears to be a reliable and valid functional measurement in patients with CHF. Crown
Authors: Panaiotis Finamore; Martijn A Spruit; Jos M G A Schols; Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi; Emiel F M Wouters; Daisy J A Janssen Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2020-04-11 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: David W Goldstein; Alexandra M Hajduk; Xuemei Song; Sui Tsang; Mary Geda; John A Dodson; Daniel E Forman; Harlan Krumholz; Sarwat I Chaudhry Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 2.081
Authors: Francisco J Martín-Sánchez; Michael Christ; Òscar Miró; W Frank Peacock; John J McMurray; Héctor Bueno; Alan S Maisel; Louise Cullen; Martin R Cowie; Salvatore Di Somma; Elke Platz; Josep Masip; Uwe Zeymer; Christiaan Vrints; Susanna Price; Christian Mueller Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: David W Goldstein; Alexandra M Hajduk; Xuemei Song; Sui Tsang; Mary Geda; James B McClurken; Mary E Tinetti; Harlan M Krumholz; Sarwat I Chaudhry Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-08-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Linda Long; Ify R Mordi; Charlene Bridges; Viral A Sagar; Edward J Davies; Andrew Js Coats; Hasnain Dalal; Karen Rees; Sally J Singh; Rod S Taylor Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-01-29
Authors: Lucía Ortega-Pérez de Villar; Francisco José Martínez-Olmos; Anna Junqué-Jiménez; Juan José Amer-Cuenca; Javier Martínez-Gramage; Tom Mercer; Eva Segura-Ortí Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexandra M Hajduk; Terrence E Murphy; Mary E Geda; John A Dodson; Sui Tsang; Leila Haghighat; Mary E Tinetti; Thomas M Gill; Sarwat I Chaudhry Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-10-07 Impact factor: 21.873