Davene R Wright1, Wayne J Katon2, Evette Ludman3, Elizabeth McCauley4, Malia Oliver5, Jeffrey Lindenbaum3, Laura P Richardson6. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Seattle Children's Research Institute Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle, Wash. Electronic address: Davene.Wright@seattlechildrens.org. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. 4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Seattle Children's Research Institute Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle, Wash; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash. 5. Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Wash. 6. Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Seattle Children's Research Institute Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle, Wash.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Screening adolescents for depression is recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force. We sought to evaluate the impact of positive depression screens in an adolescent population on health care utilization and costs from a payer perspective. METHODS: We conducted depression screening among 13- to 17-year-old adolescents enrolled in a large integrated care system using the 2- and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaires (PHQ). Health care utilization and cost data were obtained from administrative records. Chi-square, Wilcoxon rank sum, and t tests were used to test for statistical differences in outcomes between adolescents on the basis of screening status. RESULTS: Of the 4010 adolescents who completed depression screening, 3707 (92.4%) screened negative (PHQ-2 <2 or PHQ-9 <10), 186 (3.9%) screened positive for mild depression (PHQ-9 10-14), and 95 (2.4%) screened positive for moderate to severe depression (PHQ-9 ≥15). In the 12 months after screening, screen-positive adolescents were more likely than screen-negative adolescents to receive any emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization, and they had significantly higher utilization of outpatient medical (mean ± SD, 8.3 ± 1.5 vs 3.5 ± 5.1) and mental health (3.8 ± 9.3 vs 0.7 ± 3.5) visits. Total health care system costs for screen-positive adolescents ($5083 ± $10,489) were more than twice as high as those of screen-negative adolescents ($2357 ± $7621). CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent depressive symptoms, even when mild, are associated with increased health care utilization and costs. Only a minority of the increased costs is attributable to mental health care. Implementing depression screening and evidence-based mental health services may help to better control health care costs among screen-positive adolescents.
OBJECTIVE: Screening adolescents for depression is recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force. We sought to evaluate the impact of positive depression screens in an adolescent population on health care utilization and costs from a payer perspective. METHODS: We conducted depression screening among 13- to 17-year-old adolescents enrolled in a large integrated care system using the 2- and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaires (PHQ). Health care utilization and cost data were obtained from administrative records. Chi-square, Wilcoxon rank sum, and t tests were used to test for statistical differences in outcomes between adolescents on the basis of screening status. RESULTS: Of the 4010 adolescents who completed depression screening, 3707 (92.4%) screened negative (PHQ-2 <2 or PHQ-9 <10), 186 (3.9%) screened positive for mild depression (PHQ-9 10-14), and 95 (2.4%) screened positive for moderate to severe depression (PHQ-9 ≥15). In the 12 months after screening, screen-positive adolescents were more likely than screen-negative adolescents to receive any emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization, and they had significantly higher utilization of outpatient medical (mean ± SD, 8.3 ± 1.5 vs 3.5 ± 5.1) and mental health (3.8 ± 9.3 vs 0.7 ± 3.5) visits. Total health care system costs for screen-positive adolescents ($5083 ± $10,489) were more than twice as high as those of screen-negative adolescents ($2357 ± $7621). CONCLUSIONS:Adolescent depressive symptoms, even when mild, are associated with increased health care utilization and costs. Only a minority of the increased costs is attributable to mental health care. Implementing depression screening and evidence-based mental health services may help to better control health care costs among screen-positive adolescents.
Authors: Laura P Richardson; Elizabeth McCauley; David C Grossman; Carolyn A McCarty; Julie Richards; Joan E Russo; Carol Rockhill; Wayne Katon Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Mary Butler; Robert L Kane; Donna McAlpine; Roger Kathol; Steven S Fu; Hildi Hagedorn; Timothy Wilt Journal: J Ambul Care Manage Date: 2011 Apr-Jun
Authors: Oscar W Brown; Amy Hardin; Herschel R Lessin; Kelley Meade; Scot Moore; Chadwick T Rodgers; Edward S Curry; Paula M Dunca; Joseph F Hagan; Alex R Kemper; Judith S Shaw; Jack T Swanson Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-02-24 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Laura P Richardson; Carol Rockhill; Joan E Russo; David C Grossman; Julie Richards; Carolyn McCarty; Elizabeth McCauley; Wayne Katon Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Karin V Rhodes; Genevieve M Kenney; Ari B Friedman; Brendan Saloner; Charlotte C Lawson; David Chearo; Douglas Wissoker; Daniel Polsky Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Scott R Weingarten; James M Henning; Enkhe Badamgarav; Kevin Knight; Vic Hasselblad; Anacleto Gano; Joshua J Ofman Journal: BMJ Date: 2002-10-26
Authors: Christyl T Dawson; Wensong Wu; Kristopher P Fennie; Gladys Ibañez; Miguel Á Cano; Jeremy W Pettit; Mary Jo Trepka Journal: Health Place Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Corinne M Anton; Morgan B Drake; Ryan J Butts; Thi Cao; Afsaneh Rezaeizadeh; Madhukar H Trivedi; Kelli N Triplett Journal: J Clin Psychol Med Settings Date: 2021-03-27
Authors: Hans Krueger; Sylvia Robinson; Trevor Hancock; Richard Birtwhistle; Jane A Buxton; Bonnie Henry; Jennifer Scarr; John J Spinelli Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: Christian Brettschneider; Alexander Konnopka; Hannah König; Alexander Rommel; Julia Thom; Christian Schmidt; Hans-Helmut König Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Vania Martínez; Graciela Rojas; Pablo Martínez; Pedro Zitko; Matías Irarrázaval; Carolina Luttges; Ricardo Araya Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 5.428