| Literature DB >> 26455493 |
Dickson A Amugsi1,2, Raymond A Aborigo3, Abraham R Oduro3, Victor Asoala3, Timothy Awine3, Lucas Amenga-Etego3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Globally, diarrhoea and acute respiratory infections (ARIs) have been identified as major threats to child survival. In Ghana, the two conditions are among the top three causes of morbidity and mortality among children under 5 years. An in-depth analysis of the factors associated with these two diseases is warranted, because of their high degree of fatality and also it provides a basis for intervention planning.Entities:
Keywords: Ghana; children; determinants; morbidity; under 5
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26455493 PMCID: PMC4600709 DOI: 10.3402/gha.v8.29349
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Health Action ISSN: 1654-9880 Impact factor: 2.640
Descriptive analysis of the sample (n=2,790): continuous and categorical variables
| Variables | Mean±SD/% |
|---|---|
| Child age (in months) | 27.74±17.58 |
| Mother age (in years) | 30.08±7.01 |
| Child sex | |
| Male | 51.0 |
| Female | 49.0 |
| Vaccinations | |
| Polio 3 (yes) | 71.8 |
| DPT/Hep B/influenza 3 (yes) | 75.2 |
| BCG (yes) | 91.3 |
| Maternal education | |
| No education | 37.8 |
| Primary | 24.1 |
| Secondary + | 38.0 |
| Disposal of the youngest child's stool | |
| Inappropriate | 49.0 |
| Type of toilet facility | |
| Unimproved | 46.2 |
| Source of drinking water | |
| Unimproved | 22.5 |
| Place of residence | |
| Urban | 33.4 |
| Rural | 66.6 |
Mean±SD=means and standard deviations of continuous variables.
Prevalence of diarrhoea and cough by selected environmental and socio-demographic factors (n=2,790)
| Diarrhoea | Cough | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | % |
| % |
|
| Child age (in months) | ||||
| 0–5 | 9.5 | 0.001 | 13.0 | 0.001 |
| 6–11 | 26.7 | 28.0 | ||
| 12–23 | 32.4 | 27.9 | ||
| 24 + | 17.2 | 20.9 | ||
| Sex of child | ||||
| Male | 21.0 | 0.90 | 22.5 | 0.87 |
| Female | 20.8 | 22.3 | ||
| Maternal age (in years) | ||||
| 15–24 | 21.3 | 0.611 | 25.9 | 0.018 |
| 25–34 | 20.1 | 20.3 | ||
| 35–49 | 21.8 | 23.1 | ||
| Education level | ||||
| No education | 24.4 | 0.001 | 20.2 | 0.008 |
| Primary | 20.6 | 26.6 | ||
| Secondary + | 17.6 | 21.9 | ||
| Disposal of the youngest child's stool | ||||
| Appropriate | 17.3 | 0.001 | 22.4 | 0.97 |
| Inappropriate | 24.3 | 22.4 | ||
| Type of toilet facility | ||||
| Improved | 18.9 | 0.005 | 23.4 | 0.19 |
| Unimproved | 23.2 | 21.3 | ||
| Source of drinking water | ||||
| Improved | 21.0 | 0.95 | 23.1 | 0.13 |
| Unimproved | 20.9 | 20.3 | ||
| Floor material | ||||
| Non-dirt | 20.2 | 0.076 | 22.8 | 0.51 |
| Dirt | 23.4 | 21.6 | ||
| Presence of co-wives | ||||
| There are no co-wives | 18.1 | 0.001 | 21.7 | 0.58 |
| There are co-wives | 27.4 | 23.0 | ||
| Type of place of residence | ||||
| Urban | 18.5 | 0.033 | 24.8 | 0.034 |
| Rural | 22.0 | 21.2 | ||
| Overall prevalence | 20.9 | 22.4 | ||
Multiple logistic regression analysis of the socio-demographic and environmental determinants of childhood diarrhoea (n=2,790)
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | OR | 95% CI for OR | OR | 95% CI for OR | OR | 95% CI for OR | OR | 95% CI for OR |
|
| ||||||||
| Child age (in months) | ||||||||
| 0–5 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| 6–11 | 3.48 | 2.23, 5.44 | 3.54 | 2.20, 5.71 | 3.49 | 2.05, 5.96 | 3.31 | 1.87, 5.85 |
| 12–23 | 4.57 | 3.03, 6.90 | 4.70 | 3.00, 7.36 | 4.92 | 2.97, 8.16 | 4.55 | 2.64, 7.78 |
| 24 + | 1.93 | 1.30, 2.87 | 2.00 | 1.31, 3.07 | 2.05 | 1.27, 3.31 | 1.96 | 1.18, 3.25 |
| Sex of child | ||||||||
| Male | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Female | 0.94 | 0.78, 1.14 | 0.94 | 0.77, 1.13 | 0.99 | 0.80, 1.22 | 0.98 | 0.78, 1.23 |
| Maternal age in years | ||||||||
| 15–24 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| 25–34 | 0.97 | 0.76, 1.23 | 0.98 | 0.76, 1.25 | 1.04 | 0.78, 1.37 | 1.14 | 0.83, 1.57 |
| 35–49 | 1.18 | 0.90, 1.55 | 1.18 | 0.90, 1.54 | 1.22 | 0.90, 1.66 | 1.19 | 0.84, 1.69 |
|
| ||||||||
| Breastfeeding status | – | – | ||||||
| Breastfeeding | – | – | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Not breastfeeding | – | – | 1.18 | 0.93, 1.50 | 1.33 | 1.03, 1.73 | 1.48 | 1.11, 1.98 |
| Polio 3 vaccination | – | – | ||||||
| Vaccinated | – | – | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Not vaccinated | – | – | 0.68 | 0.46, 0.99 | 0.72 | 0.48, 1.08 | 0.77 | 0.50, 1.19 |
| DPT/Hep B/influenza 3 vaccination | – | – | ||||||
| Vaccinated | – | – | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Not vaccinated | – | – | 1.53 | 1.03, 2.26 | 1.41 | 0.92, 2.16 | 1.28 | 0.81, 2.01 |
|
| ||||||||
| Education level | – | – | – | – | ||||
| Secondary + | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Primary | – | – | – | – | 0.93 | 0.67, 1.29 | 0.91 | 0.63, 1.31 |
| No education | – | – | – | – | 1.11 | 0.81, 1.52 | 1.03 | 0.71, 1.49 |
| Has a say in decision-making index | – | – | – | – | 0.94 | 0.87, 1.01 | 0.99 | 0.91, 1.09 |
| Wife beating not justified index | – | – | – | – | 0.86 | 0.80, 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.80, 0.92 |
| Can refuse husband sex index | – | – | – | – | 0.89 | 0.79, 1.01 | 0.93 | 0.82, 1.07 |
|
| ||||||||
| Disposal of the youngest child's stool | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Appropriate | – | – | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref |
| Inappropriate | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.24 | 0.98, 1.58 |
| Type of toilet facility | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Improved | – | – | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref |
| Unimproved | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.98 | 0.74, 1.30 |
| Source of drinking water | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Improved | – | – | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref |
| Unimproved | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.97 | 0.74, 1.28 |
| Floor material | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Non-dirt | – | – | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref |
| Dirt | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.05 | 0.77, 1.42 |
| Presence of co-wives | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| There are no co-wives | – | – | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref |
| There are co-wives | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.74 | 1.33, 2.27 |
| Household wealth index | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Richest | – | – | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref |
| Rich | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.22 | 0.72, 2.05 |
| Middle | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.77 | 1.03, 3.06 |
| Poor | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.45 | 0.80, 2.65 |
| Poorest | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.72 | 0.88, 3.35 |
| Type of place of residence | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Urban | – | – | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref |
| Rural | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.97 | 0.68, 1.37 |
OR, odds ratios; CI, confidence intervals.
Significant at p<0.05.
Multiple logistic regression analysis of the socio-demographic and environmental determinants of childhood cough (n=2,790)
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | OR | 95% CI for OR | OR | 95% CI for OR | OR | 95% CI for OR | OR | 95% CI for OR |
|
| ||||||||
| Child age (in months) | ||||||||
| 0–5 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| 6–11 | 2.64 | 1.76, 3.97 | 2.64 | 1.70, 4.09 | 2.92 | 1.81, 4.71 | 2.63 | 1.59, 4.33 |
| 12–23 | 2.63 | 1.81, 3.83 | 2.62 | 1.74, 3.96 | 2.73 | 1.74, 4.30 | 2.46 | 1.53, 3.96 |
| 24 + | 1.83 | 1.29, 2.59 | 1.85 | 1.26, 2.70 | 1.92 | 1.27, 2.92 | 1.76 | 1.14, 2.73 |
| Sex of child | ||||||||
| Male | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Female | 0.98 | 0.89, 1.18 | 0.98 | 0.81, 1.17 | 1.02 | 0.84, 1.25 | 0.98 | 0.80, 1.22 |
| Maternal age in years | ||||||||
| 15–24 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| 25–34 | 0.73 | 0.58, 0.92 | 0.74 | 0.59, 0.93 | 0.76 | 0.58, 0.98 | 0.69 | 0.52, 0.92 |
| 35–49 | 0.88 | 0.68, 1.13 | 0.87 | 0.67, 1.12 | 0.98 | 0.74, 1.32 | 0.89 | 0.65, 1.21 |
|
| ||||||||
| Breastfeeding status | – | – | ||||||
| Breastfeeding | – | – | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Not breastfeeding | – | – | 1.28 | 1.02, 1.60 | 1.31 | 1.02, 1.68 | 1.24 | 0.95, 1.62 |
| Polio 3 vaccination | – | |||||||
| Vaccinated | – | – | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Not vaccinated | – | – | 087 | 0.61, 1.24 | 0.81 | 0.55, 1.19 | 0.81 | 0.54, 1.21 |
| DPT/HepB/influenza 3 vaccination | – | – | ||||||
| Vaccinated | – | – | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Not vaccinated | – | – | 1.15 | 0.79, 1.67 | 1.27 | 0.85, 1.90 | 1.30 | 0.85, 1.99 |
|
| ||||||||
| Education level | – | – | – | – | ||||
| Secondary + | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Primary | – | – | – | – | 1.40 | 1.03, 1.89 | 1.53 | 1.10, 2.14 |
| No education | – | – | – | – | 0.99 | 0.73, 1.37 | 1.08 | 0.75, 1.55 |
| Has a say in decision-making index | – | – | – | – | 0.98 | 0.92, 1.06 | 1.02 | 0.93, 1.11 |
| Wife beating not justified index | – | – | – | – | 0.88 | 0.83, 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.83, 0.96 |
| Can refuse husband sex index | – | – | – | – | 0.86 | 0.77, 0.97 | 0.86 | 0.76, 0.97 |
|
| ||||||||
| Disposal of the youngest child's stool | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Appropriate | – | – | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref |
| Inappropriate | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.02 | 0.81, 1.28 |
| Type of toilet facility | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Improved | – | – | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref |
| Unimproved | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.80 | 0.61, 1.05 |
| Source of drinking water | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Improved | – | – | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref |
| Unimproved | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.90 | 0.69, 1.17 |
| Floor material | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Non-dirt | – | – | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref |
| Dirt | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.86 | 0.64, 1.17 |
| Presence of co-wives | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| There are no co-wives | – | – | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref |
| There are co-wives | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.13 | 0.56, 1.48 |
| Household wealth index | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Richest | – | – | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref |
| Rich | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.52 | 0.94, 2.24 |
| Middle | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.54 | 0.94, 2.38 |
| Poor | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.81 | 1.08, 3.04 |
| Poorest | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.98 | 1.09, 3.60 |
| Type of place of residence | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Urban | – | – | – | – | – | – | Ref | Ref |
| Rural | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.77 | 0.57, 1.06 |
OR, odds ratios; CI, confidence intervals.
Significant at p<0.05.