Heidemarie Zach1, Arno M Janssen2, Anke H Snijders2, Arnaud Delval3, Murielle U Ferraye2, Eduard Auff4, Vivian Weerdesteyn5, Bastiaan R Bloem2, Jorik Nonnekes6. 1. Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: heidemarie.zach@meduniwien.ac.at. 2. Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Neurology and Movement Disorders, Regional University Hospital, Lille Cedex, France. 4. Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 5. Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Rehabilitation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Sint Maartenskliniek Research, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 6. Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Rehabilitation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Freezing of gait (FOG) is a common and debilitating phenomenon in Parkinson's disease (PD). Wearable accelerometers might help to assess FOG in the research setting. Here, we evaluate whether accelerometry can detect FOG while executing rapid full turns and while walking with rapid short steps (the two most common provoking circumstances for FOG). METHODS: We included 23 PD patients, who all had objective FOG. Participants performed several walking tasks, including walking rapidly with short steps and rapid full turns in both directions with a triaxial linear waist-mounted accelerometer. Two independent experts identified FOG episodes using off-line video-analysis (gold standard). A validated algorithm [ratio between pathological freezing (3-8 Hz)-and normal locomotor frequencies (0.5-3 Hz)] was applied on the accelerometer data to detect FOG episodes. RESULTS: Clinically, FOG was most often observed during full rapid turns (81% of all episodes), followed by walking with short rapid steps (12% of all episodes). During full rapid turns, accelerometry yielded a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 59%. A sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 69% was observed during walking rapidly with small steps. Combining all tasks rendered a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 76%. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that FOG can be detected from a single lumbar accelerometer during several walking tasks, including full rapid turns and walking with short steps rapidly, with reasonable sensitivity and specificity. This approach holds promise for possible implementation as complementary objective outcome in a research setting, but more work remains needed to improve the sensitivity and specificity.
BACKGROUND: Freezing of gait (FOG) is a common and debilitating phenomenon in Parkinson's disease (PD). Wearable accelerometers might help to assess FOG in the research setting. Here, we evaluate whether accelerometry can detect FOG while executing rapid full turns and while walking with rapid short steps (the two most common provoking circumstances for FOG). METHODS: We included 23 PDpatients, who all had objective FOG. Participants performed several walking tasks, including walking rapidly with short steps and rapid full turns in both directions with a triaxial linear waist-mounted accelerometer. Two independent experts identified FOG episodes using off-line video-analysis (gold standard). A validated algorithm [ratio between pathological freezing (3-8 Hz)-and normal locomotor frequencies (0.5-3 Hz)] was applied on the accelerometer data to detect FOG episodes. RESULTS: Clinically, FOG was most often observed during full rapid turns (81% of all episodes), followed by walking with short rapid steps (12% of all episodes). During full rapid turns, accelerometry yielded a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 59%. A sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 69% was observed during walking rapidly with small steps. Combining all tasks rendered a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 76%. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that FOG can be detected from a single lumbar accelerometer during several walking tasks, including full rapid turns and walking with short steps rapidly, with reasonable sensitivity and specificity. This approach holds promise for possible implementation as complementary objective outcome in a research setting, but more work remains needed to improve the sensitivity and specificity.
Authors: Martina Mancini; Bastiaan R Bloem; Fay B Horak; Simon J G Lewis; Alice Nieuwboer; Jorik Nonnekes Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Martina Mancini; Katrijn Smulders; Rajal G Cohen; Fay B Horak; Nir Giladi; John G Nutt Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Ana Lígia Silva de Lima; Luc J W Evers; Tim Hahn; Lauren Bataille; Jamie L Hamilton; Max A Little; Yasuyuki Okuma; Bastiaan R Bloem; Marjan J Faber Journal: J Neurol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Lauren Broom; Brian A Ellison; Audrey Worley; Lara Wagenaar; Elina Sörberg; Christine Ashton; David A Bennett; Aron S Buchman; Clifford B Saper; Ludy C Shih; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; Veronique G VanderHorst Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Daniel Rodríguez-Martín; Albert Samà; Carlos Pérez-López; Andreu Català; Joan M Moreno Arostegui; Joan Cabestany; Àngels Bayés; Sheila Alcaine; Berta Mestre; Anna Prats; M Cruz Crespo; Timothy J Counihan; Patrick Browne; Leo R Quinlan; Gearóid ÓLaighin; Dean Sweeney; Hadas Lewy; Joseph Azuri; Gabriel Vainstein; Roberta Annicchiarico; Alberto Costa; Alejandro Rodríguez-Molinero Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 3.240