Literature DB >> 26454323

Predictability in orbital reconstruction: A human cadaver study. Part II: Navigation-assisted orbital reconstruction.

Leander Dubois1, Ruud Schreurs2, Jesper Jansen3, Thomas J J Maal2, Harald Essig4, Peter J J Gooris3, Alfred G Becking3.   

Abstract

Preformed orbital reconstruction plates are useful for treating orbital defects. However, intraoperative errors can lead to misplaced implants and poor outcomes. Navigation-assisted surgery may help optimize orbital reconstruction. We aimed to explore whether navigation-assisted surgery is more predictable than traditional orbital reconstruction for optimal implant placement. Pre-injury computed tomography scans were obtained for 10 cadaver heads (20 orbits). Complex orbital fractures (Class III-IV) were created in all orbits, which were reconstructed using a transconjunctival approach with and without navigation. The best possible fit of the stereolithographic file of a preformed orbital mesh plate was used as the optimal position for reconstruction. The accuracy of the implant positions was evaluated using iPlan software. The consistency of orbital reconstruction was lower in the traditional reconstructions than in the navigation group in the parameters of translation and rotation. Implant position also differed significantly in the parameters of translation (p = 0.002) and rotation (pitch: p = 0.77; yaw: p < 0.001; roll: p = 0.001). Compared with traditional orbital reconstruction, navigation-assisted reconstruction provides more predictable anatomical reconstruction of complex orbital defects and significantly improves orbital implant position.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Navigation; Orbital fractures; Orbital implants; Reconstructive surgical procedures; Surgery, computer-assisted; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26454323     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  8 in total

1.  [Intraoperative quality management modalities in head and neck surgery].

Authors:  M A Füßinger; F Duttenhoefer; G Bittermann; R Schmelzeisen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Three-dimensional quantification of skeletal midfacial complex symmetry.

Authors:  Nermin Morgan; Sohaib Shujaat; Omid Jazil; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  Digital planning and individual implants for secondary reconstruction of midfacial deformities: A pilot study.

Authors:  Paris Liokatis; Yoana Malenova; Florian-Nepomuk Fegg; Selgai Haidari; Monika Probst; Marko Boskov; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Matthias Troeltzsch; Florian-Andreas Probst
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-02-04

Review 4.  Contemporary reconstruction after complex facial trauma.

Authors:  Matthew R Zeiderman; Lee L Q Pu
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2020-02-28

5.  Role of Navigation in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Surgeon's Perspectives.

Authors:  Manish Anand; Shreya Panwar
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2021-04-15

6.  Clinical efficacy of peek patient-specific implants in orbital reconstruction.

Authors:  Yurii Chepurnyi; Denis Chernogorskyi; Andrey Kopchak; Oksana Petrenko
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-01-29

7.  A retrospective study to compare the treatment outcomes with and without surgical navigation for fracture of the orbital wall.

Authors:  Chun-Lin Zong; Yu-Lin Shi; Jun-Qi Jia; Ming-Chao Ding; Shi-Ping Chang; Jin-Biao Lu; Yuan-Li Chen; Lei Tian
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2020-11-17

8.  Surgical Navigation, Augmented Reality, and 3D Printing for Hard Palate Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma En-Bloc Resection: Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Mónica García-Sevilla; Rafael Moreta-Martinez; David García-Mato; Gema Arenas de Frutos; Santiago Ochandiano; Carlos Navarro-Cuéllar; Guillermo Sanjuán de Moreta; Javier Pascau
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.