Literature DB >> 26454320

Predictability in orbital reconstruction: A human cadaver study. Part I: Endoscopic-assisted orbital reconstruction.

Leander Dubois1, Jesper Jansen2, Ruud Schreurs3, Perooz Saeed4, Ludo Beenen5, Thomas J J Maal3, Peter J J Gooris2, Alfred G Becking2.   

Abstract

In the treatment of orbital defects, surgeon errors may lead to incorrect positioning of orbital implants and, consequently, poor clinical outcomes. Endoscopy can provide additional visualization of the orbit through the transantral approach. We aimed to evaluate whether endoscopic guidance during orbital reconstruction facilitates optimal implant placement and can serve as a convenient alternative for navigation and intra-operative imaging. Ten human cadaveric heads were subjected to thin-slice computed tomography (CT). Complex orbital fractures (Class III/IV) were created in all eligible orbits (n = 19), which were then reconstructed using the conventional transconjunctival approach with or without endoscopic guidance. The ideal implant location was digitally determined using pre-operative CT images, and the accuracy of implant placement was evaluated by comparing the planned implant location with the postoperative location. There were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) in the degree of implant dislocation (translation and rotation) between the transconjunctival orbital reconstruction and the endoscopic-assisted orbital reconstruction groups. Endoscopic-assisted orbital reconstruction may facilitate the visualization of orbital defects and is particularly useful for training purposes; however, it offers no additional benefits in terms of accurate implant positioning during the anatomical reconstruction of complex orbital defects.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscope; Orbital fractures; Orbital implants; Reconstructive surgical procedures; Surgery, computer-assisted; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26454320     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  4 in total

1.  [Intraoperative quality management modalities in head and neck surgery].

Authors:  M A Füßinger; F Duttenhoefer; G Bittermann; R Schmelzeisen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Reconstruction for diverse fronto-orbital defects with computer-assisted designed and computer-assisted manufactured PEEK implants in one-stage operation: Case reports.

Authors:  Min Yang; Zhangyi Wu; Hai Yu; Jun Cheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Clinical efficacy of peek patient-specific implants in orbital reconstruction.

Authors:  Yurii Chepurnyi; Denis Chernogorskyi; Andrey Kopchak; Oksana Petrenko
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-01-29

4.  A retrospective study to compare the treatment outcomes with and without surgical navigation for fracture of the orbital wall.

Authors:  Chun-Lin Zong; Yu-Lin Shi; Jun-Qi Jia; Ming-Chao Ding; Shi-Ping Chang; Jin-Biao Lu; Yuan-Li Chen; Lei Tian
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2020-11-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.