Silvia Iglesias1, Darío Jacobsen2, Diego Gonzalez2, Sergio Azzara3, Esteban M Repetto2, Juan Jamardo2, Sabrina Garín Gómez2, Viviana Mesch2, Gabriela Berg2, Bibiana Fabre4. 1. Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 2. Clinical Biochemistry Department, INFIBIOC, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 3. Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 4. Clinical Biochemistry Department, INFIBIOC, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: bfabre@ffyb.uba.ar.
Abstract
AIMS: Longitudinal and experimental studies have shown that chronic stress contributes to the onset and progression of different diseases. Although it is not possible to eliminate stress completely, people can learn to manage it by participating in different kinds of stress management interventions. This study examined the effectiveness of stress management interventions on neuroendocrine responses in stressed students and health professionals, by measuring hair cortisol in comparison to salivary cortisol. MAIN METHODS: Salivary and hair cortisol measurements were performed in 37 subjects (31women, 6 men; mean age 34.0±10.6) who attended to a Coping Stress and Quality of Care Program at the University of Buenos Aires. Cortisol was measured at the beginning and at the end of the program. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI was used to evaluate state and trait anxiety. KEY FINDINGS: In subjects who completed the program, no differences were observed in salivary cortisol levels between the first and the last session. However, in these subjects, hair cortisol obtained in the last session was significantly lower than hair cortisol in the first session. SIGNIFICANCE: Hair cortisol appears to be a better biomarker than salivary cortisol for evaluation of the effectiveness of a stress reduction program and it seems to be a better indicator of stress system dysregulation as well.
AIMS: Longitudinal and experimental studies have shown that chronic stress contributes to the onset and progression of different diseases. Although it is not possible to eliminate stress completely, people can learn to manage it by participating in different kinds of stress management interventions. This study examined the effectiveness of stress management interventions on neuroendocrine responses in stressed students and health professionals, by measuring hair cortisol in comparison to salivary cortisol. MAIN METHODS: Salivary and hair cortisol measurements were performed in 37 subjects (31women, 6 men; mean age 34.0±10.6) who attended to a Coping Stress and Quality of Care Program at the University of Buenos Aires. Cortisol was measured at the beginning and at the end of the program. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI was used to evaluate state and trait anxiety. KEY FINDINGS: In subjects who completed the program, no differences were observed in salivary cortisol levels between the first and the last session. However, in these subjects, hair cortisol obtained in the last session was significantly lower than hair cortisol in the first session. SIGNIFICANCE: Hair cortisol appears to be a better biomarker than salivary cortisol for evaluation of the effectiveness of a stress reduction program and it seems to be a better indicator of stress system dysregulation as well.
Authors: Ritika Sharma; Martin G Frasch; Silvia M Lobmaier; Marta C Antonelli; Camila Zelgert; Peter Zimmermann; Bibiana Fabre; Rory Wilson; Melanie Waldenberger; James W MacDonald; Theo K Bammler Journal: Clin Epigenetics Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 7.259
Authors: Ann F Jacobson; Wendy A Umberger; Patrick A Palmieri; Thomas S Alexander; Rodney P Myerscough; Claire B Draucker; Susann Steudte-Schmiedgen; Clemens Kirschbaum Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 2.579
Authors: Judit Tenk; Péter Mátrai; Péter Hegyi; Ildikó Rostás; András Garami; Imre Szabó; Margit Solymár; Erika Pétervári; József Czimmer; Katalin Márta; Alexandra Mikó; Nóra Füredi; Andrea Párniczky; Csaba Zsiborás; Márta Balaskó Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dana Schultchen; Ann-Marie Küchler; Christine Schillings; Felicitas Weineck; Alexander Karabatsiakis; David D Ebert; Harald Baumeister; Olga Pollatos Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 2.692