Saoirse O'Toole1, Miten Mistry2, Mahdi Mutahar2, Rebecca Moazzez3, David Bartlett4. 1. King's College London Dental Institute, London, England, United Kingdom. Electronic address: saoirse.otoole@kcl.ac.uk. 2. King's College London Dental Institute, London, England, United Kingdom. 3. Dental Institute Oral Clinical Research Unit, King's College London Dental Institute, London, England, United Kingdom. 4. Prosthodontics, King's College London Dental Institute, London, England, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Investigate the timing of stannous (SnF2) and sodium fluoride (NaF) application with and without salivary pellicle to prevent enamel erosion. METHODS:Human buccal molar enamel samples (n=120, REC ref 12/LO/1836) were randomly assigned to three groups testing SnF2 and NaF basic fluoride formulation and commercial mouthrinses with and without the presence of human saliva. Samples were randomly allocated to 2 subgroups: immersion in either fluoride for 1 min either before or after citric acid immersion (0.3%, pH 3.2, 10 min), and the cycle repeated 5 times. For human saliva group, samples were immersed in 80 ml of natural saliva for 24 h prior to the experiment. Analysis was done using non-contacting profilometry and microhardness change. Data were not normal and were log transformed. A linear model tested statistical differences between the groups. RESULTS: SnF2 application before erosion statistically reduced step height compared to application after erosion for all groups (solutions: 6.5 μm (±1.2), 7.5 μm (±0.8); p=0.01, mouthrinses: 3.2 μm (±0.6), 4.2 μm (±0.7); p<0.0001, mouthrinses with saliva: 2.5 μm (±0.4), 3.1 μm (±0.6); p=0.002, before and after respectively). In contrast, application of NaF before erosion increased step height compared to application after, but this was only statistically significant for the saliva group (before: 5.6 μm (±0.3) and after: 4.9 μm (±0.3); p=0.023). Presence of saliva increased microhardness change (p<0.0001). Within this group, greatest microhardness change was observed when SnF2 was applied before erosion and when NaF was applied after erosion (SnF2: 156.6KHN (±32.8), 123KHN (±20.1); p=0.02. NaF: 119.5KHN (±33.5), 218KHN (±24.9), before, and after respectively). CONCLUSION: SnF2 reduced step height formation overall when compared to NaF, but particularly when applied before citric acid immersion. In contrast, NaF reduced step height when applied after citric acid immersion, but only in the presence of saliva. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Stannous fluoride can be recommended over sodium fluoride to patients at risk of dental erosion and is optimally applied before erosion occurs. If sodium fluoride is to be used in the presence of saliva it is optimally applied after erosion has occurred.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Investigate the timing of stannous (SnF2) and sodium fluoride (NaF) application with and without salivary pellicle to prevent enamel erosion. METHODS:Human buccal molar enamel samples (n=120, REC ref 12/LO/1836) were randomly assigned to three groups testing SnF2 and NaF basic fluoride formulation and commercial mouthrinses with and without the presence of human saliva. Samples were randomly allocated to 2 subgroups: immersion in either fluoride for 1 min either before or after citric acid immersion (0.3%, pH 3.2, 10 min), and the cycle repeated 5 times. For human saliva group, samples were immersed in 80 ml of natural saliva for 24 h prior to the experiment. Analysis was done using non-contacting profilometry and microhardness change. Data were not normal and were log transformed. A linear model tested statistical differences between the groups. RESULTS:SnF2 application before erosion statistically reduced step height compared to application after erosion for all groups (solutions: 6.5 μm (±1.2), 7.5 μm (±0.8); p=0.01, mouthrinses: 3.2 μm (±0.6), 4.2 μm (±0.7); p<0.0001, mouthrinses with saliva: 2.5 μm (±0.4), 3.1 μm (±0.6); p=0.002, before and after respectively). In contrast, application of NaF before erosion increased step height compared to application after, but this was only statistically significant for the saliva group (before: 5.6 μm (±0.3) and after: 4.9 μm (±0.3); p=0.023). Presence of saliva increased microhardness change (p<0.0001). Within this group, greatest microhardness change was observed when SnF2 was applied before erosion and when NaF was applied after erosion (SnF2: 156.6KHN (±32.8), 123KHN (±20.1); p=0.02. NaF: 119.5KHN (±33.5), 218KHN (±24.9), before, and after respectively). CONCLUSION:SnF2 reduced step height formation overall when compared to NaF, but particularly when applied before citric acid immersion. In contrast, NaF reduced step height when applied after citric acid immersion, but only in the presence of saliva. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Stannous fluoride can be recommended over sodium fluoride to patients at risk of dental erosion and is optimally applied before erosion occurs. If sodium fluoride is to be used in the presence of saliva it is optimally applied after erosion has occurred.