Asako Mori1, Yasumasa Okamoto2, Go Okada1, Koki Takagaki1, Ran Jinnin1, Masahiro Takamura1, Makoto Kobayakawa1, Shigeto Yamawaki1. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan. Electronic address: oy@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Late adolescents are under increased risk of developing depressive symptoms. Behavioral activation is an effective treatment for subthreshold depression, which can prevent the development of subthreshold depression into a major depressive disorder. However, the neural mechanisms underlying the efficacy of behavioral activation have not been clearly understood. We investigated neural responses during reward processing by individuals with subthreshold depression to clarify the neural mechanisms of behavioral activation. METHODS:Late adolescent university students with subthreshold depression (n=15, age 18-19 years) as indicated by a high score on the Beck's Depression Inventory-ll (BDI-ll) and 15 age-matched controls with a low BDI-ll score participated in functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning conducted during a monetary incentive delay task on two occasions. The Individuals in the subthreshold depression group received five, weekly behavioral activation sessions between the two scanning sessions. Moreover, they did not receive any medication until the study was completed. RESULTS:Behavioral activation significantly reduced depressive symptoms. Moreover, compared to the changes in brain functions in the control group, the behavioral activation group showed functional changes during loss anticipation in brain structures that mediates cognitive and emotional regulation, including the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and angular gyrus. LIMITATIONS: Replication of the study with a larger sample size is required to increase the generalizability of these results. CONCLUSIONS:Behavioral activation results in improved functioning of the fronto-parietal region during loss anticipation. These results increase our understanding of the mechanisms underlying specific psychotherapies.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Late adolescents are under increased risk of developing depressive symptoms. Behavioral activation is an effective treatment for subthreshold depression, which can prevent the development of subthreshold depression into a major depressive disorder. However, the neural mechanisms underlying the efficacy of behavioral activation have not been clearly understood. We investigated neural responses during reward processing by individuals with subthreshold depression to clarify the neural mechanisms of behavioral activation. METHODS: Late adolescent university students with subthreshold depression (n=15, age 18-19 years) as indicated by a high score on the Beck's Depression Inventory-ll (BDI-ll) and 15 age-matched controls with a low BDI-ll score participated in functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning conducted during a monetary incentive delay task on two occasions. The Individuals in the subthreshold depression group received five, weekly behavioral activation sessions between the two scanning sessions. Moreover, they did not receive any medication until the study was completed. RESULTS: Behavioral activation significantly reduced depressive symptoms. Moreover, compared to the changes in brain functions in the control group, the behavioral activation group showed functional changes during loss anticipation in brain structures that mediates cognitive and emotional regulation, including the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and angular gyrus. LIMITATIONS: Replication of the study with a larger sample size is required to increase the generalizability of these results. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioral activation results in improved functioning of the fronto-parietal region during loss anticipation. These results increase our understanding of the mechanisms underlying specific psychotherapies.
Authors: Hanna Keren; Georgia O'Callaghan; Pablo Vidal-Ribas; George A Buzzell; Melissa A Brotman; Ellen Leibenluft; Pedro M Pan; Liana Meffert; Ariela Kaiser; Selina Wolke; Daniel S Pine; Argyris Stringaris Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Andrew M Novick; Mateus L Levandowski; Laura E Laumann; Noah S Philip; Lawrence H Price; Audrey R Tyrka Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Michael I Demidenko; Alexander S Weigard; Karthikeyan Ganesan; Hyesue Jang; Andrew Jahn; Edward D Huntley; Daniel P Keating Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Maria Kryza-Lacombe; Nana Pearson; Sonja Lyubomirsky; Murray B Stein; Jillian Lee Wiggins; Charles T Taylor Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2021-04-15
Authors: Jeffrey S Bedwell; Geoffrey F Potts; Diane C Gooding; Benjamin J Trachik; Chi C Chan; Christopher C Spencer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: S Shiota; Y Okamoto; G Okada; K Takagaki; M Takamura; A Mori; S Yokoyama; Y Nishiyama; R Jinnin; R I Hashimoto; S Yamawaki Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 7.723