Literature DB >> 26453983

Should progesterone on the human chorionic gonadotropin day still be measured?

Francisca Martinez1, Ignacio Rodriguez2, Marta Devesa2, Rosario Buxaderas2, Maria José Gómez2, Buenaventura Coroleu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in our setting whether there is currently a level of P on the hCG day (P-hCG) predictive of no pregnancy.
DESIGN: Observational study of prospectively collected data of the P-hCG levels of stimulated IVF cycles.
SETTING: In vitro fertilization unit. PATIENT(S): All cycles of IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh embryo transfer performed between January 2009 and March 2014. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): Clinical pregnancy rate per ET was 38.7% and live birth rate was 29.1%. The P-hCG concentration was positively correlated to E2 on the hCG day, and the number of oocytes was negatively correlated to age. Progesterone on hCG day was higher among agonist- compared with antagonist-treated patients (mean ± SD: 1.13 ± 0.69 ng/mL vs. 0.97 ± 0.50 ng/mL) and among recombinant FSH compared with recombinant FSH + hMG stimulation (mean ± SD: 1.11 ± 0.58 ng/mL vs. 0.94 ± 0.50 ng/mL). Pregnancy rate was positively associated with the number of oocytes. There was no correlation between P-hCG value and pregnancy rate, overall or according to the type of treatment. CONCLUSION(S): In our setting there is no P-hCG value differentiating a good from a poor cycle success rate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02323347.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcomes; ovarian stimulation; pregnancy rate; progesterone levels

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26453983     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  9 in total

Review 1.  The curious case of premature luteinization.

Authors:  Apostolos Kaponis; Elpiniki Chronopoulou; George Decavalas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The effect of trophectoderm biopsy technique and sample handling on artefactual mosaicism.

Authors:  Lluc Coll; Mònica Parriego; Beatriz Carrasco; Ignacio Rodríguez; Montserrat Boada; Buenaventura Coroleu; Nikolaos P Polyzos; Francesca Vidal; Anna Veiga
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 3.  Revisiting debates of premature luteinization and its effect on assisted reproductive technology outcome.

Authors:  Reda S Hussein; Ihab Elnashar; Ahmed F Amin; Hisham A Abou-Taleb; Ahmed M Abbas; Ahmed M Abdelmageed; Tarek Farghaly; Yulian Zhao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  In vitro fertilization outcome in frozen versus fresh embryo transfer in women with elevated progesterone level on the day of HCG injection: An RCT.

Authors:  Marzieh Aghahosseini; Ashraf Aleyasin; Fatemeh Sadat Sarfjoo; Atossa Mahdavi; Mansooreh Yaraghi; Hojattollah Saeedabadi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2017-12

5.  Progesterone elevation on the day of hCG trigger has detrimental effect on live birth rate in low and intermediate ovarian responders, but not in high responders.

Authors:  Ze Wu; Yunhua Dong; Yanping Ma; Yonggang Li; Lei Li; Na Lin; Yunxiu Li; Li Zhuan; Yun Bai; Xi Luo; Xiaomin Kang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Early Progesterone Change Associated With Pregnancy Outcome After Fresh Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproduction Technology Cycles With Progesterone Level of >1.5 ng/ml on Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Trigger Day.

Authors:  Chun-I Lee; Hsiu-Hui Chen; Chun-Chia Huang; Pin-Yao Lin; Tsung-Hsien Lee; Maw-Sheng Lee
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.555

7.  The value of serum progesterone level on day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration / metaphase II oocyte ratio in predicting IVF/ICSI outcome in patients with normal ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Ahmad Mahran; Mohammed Khairy; Reham Elkhateeb; Abdel Rahman Hegazy; Ayman Abdelmeged; Gaber El-Saber Batiha; Khalaf F Alsharif; Helal F Hetta; Haitham Ahmed Bahaa
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.234

8.  There is a cycle to cycle variation in ovarian response and pre-hCG serum progesterone level: an analysis of 244 consecutive IVF cycles.

Authors:  Sule Yildiz; Kayhan Yakin; Baris Ata; Ozgur Oktem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Freeze-all, for whom, when, and how.

Authors:  Paula Celada; Ernesto Bosch
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 2.384

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.