Literature DB >> 26453642

Arcuate keratotomy on post-keratoplasty astigmatism is unpredictable and frequently needs repeat procedures to increase its success rate.

Huseyin Bayramlar1, Remzi Karadag1, Ozgur Cakici1, Isilay Ozsoy1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and predictability of arcuate keratotomy (AK) for post-keratoplasty astigmatism and to present the complications and rate of repeat procedures.
METHODS: Sixteen eyes from 14 patients were included. Paired 70-80° arc length AKs centred on the steep axis were carried out 0.5 mm within the graft-host junction. The depth of the AKs was set at approximately 80-90% of the depth of the cornea, based on a topographic pachymeter at the incision location. The outcome measures included preoperative and postoperative topographic astigmatism, uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, surgical complications and repeat procedures.
RESULTS: In 12 of the 16 eyes (75%), at least one additional surgical procedure was required to obtain the desired result: suturing for overcorrection or wound gape in six eyes (38%), lengthening of the incisions for undercorrection in four eyes (25%) and additional AKs for marked astigmatic axis displacement in three eyes (19%). The mean preoperative astigmatism was 10.45±3.82 dioptres (D); the postoperative astigmatism at the last visit was 2.99±1.14 D (in a mean follow-up of 17.6±5.55 months). The efficacy index was 0.83 and the safety index was 1.68.
CONCLUSIONS: In treatment of post-keratoplasty astigmatism, AK does not have a good predictability. Additional procedures such as lengthening of the AK incisions for undercorrection or using compression sutures for overcorrection with significantly gaping wounds are frequently required to improve the final outcome. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cornea; Ocular surface; Optics and Refraction; Wound healing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26453642     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  4 in total

1.  Vector analysis of femtosecond laser-assisted astigmatic keratotomy after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Fouad anNakhli; Ashbala Khattak
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  Post Penetrating Keratoplasty Ectasia: Incidence, Risk Factors, Clinical Features, and Treatment Options.

Authors:  Antonio Moramarco; Lorenzo Gardini; Danilo Iannetta; Piera Versura; Luigi Fontana
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Malapposition of graft-host interface after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK): an optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Yujin Zhao; Hong Zhuang; Jiaxu Hong; Lijia Tian; Jianjiang Xu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Topography-Guided Trans-Epithelial No-Touch Photorefractive Keratectomy for High Irregular Astigmatism After Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Prospective 12-Months Follow-Up.

Authors:  Leopoldo Spadea; Giacomo Visioli; Davide Mastromarino; Shehani Alexander; Santino Pistella
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 2.423

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.