| Literature DB >> 26452666 |
Viviane Medeiros-Silva1, Rodrigo Gurgel-Gonçalves2,3, Nadjar Nitz4, Lucia Emilia D' Anduraim Morales5, Laurício Monteiro Cruz5, Isabele Gonçalves Sobral5, Mariana Côrtes Boité6, Gabriel Eduardo Melim Ferreira7, Elisa Cupolillo8, Gustavo Adolfo Sierra Romero9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The main transmission route of Leishmania infantum is through the bites of sand flies. However, alternative mechanisms are being investigated, such as through the bites of ticks, which could have epidemiological relevance. The objective of this work was to verify the presence of Leishmania spp. in Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato collected from naturally infected dogs in the Federal District of Brazil.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26452666 PMCID: PMC4600268 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-015-0576-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Sampling processing flow. SG: salivary gland; Int: intestine; Seq: sequencing; Ø: nymph. RFLP: restriction fragment lengh polymorphism. The numbers in the boxes show the number of samples/pools processed
Results of kDNA detection by PCR in pools of salivary glands and intestines of Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato collected from dogs in an endemic area of visceral leishmaniasis in the Federal District, Brazil, 2011
| kDNA PCR | ||
|---|---|---|
| Samples | Positive/Examined pools | Positivity (%) |
| Salivary glands ( | ||
| Females | 7/21 | 33.3 |
| Males | 5/20 | 25.0 |
| Nymphs | 1/3 | 33.3 |
| Subtotal | 13/44 | 29.5 |
| Intestines ( | ||
| Females | 6/21 | 28,6 |
| Males | 5/20 | 25.0 |
| Nymphs | 1/3 | 33.3 |
| Subtotal | 12/44 | 27.3 |
| Total | 25/88 | 28,4 |
Results of all methods applied to the samples taken from dogs and ticks that showed growth of a Leishmania culture from the material obtained from the ticks, Federal District, Brazil, 2011
| Dogs | Ticks | Cultures | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dog | ELISA | IFI | DPP | PCR Canine blood (kDNA) | PCR Canine blood (hsp70) | Collected ticks | Tick sex (n) | PCR (kDNA) Pool SG | PCR (kDNA) Pool Int. | Culture (NNN) | PCR (kDNA) Culture | PCR (hsp70) Culture |
| I | Reagent | 1/80 | Positive | Positive | Negative | 6 | Male (1) | Positivo | Negative | Negative | ND | ND |
| Female (5) | Positive | Positive | Positive | Positive | Positive | |||||||
| II | Reagent | 1/80 | Positive | Positive | Negative | 5 | Male (5) | Positive | Positive | Positive | Negative | Negative |
| III | Reagent | 1/80 | Positive | Positive | Positive | 8 | Male (5) | Positive | Positive | Positive | Positive | Positive |
| Female (3) | Positive | Positive | Positive | Positive | Positive | |||||||
| IV | Reagente | 1/40 | Positive | Positive | Positive | 2 | Male (1) | Negative | Negative | Negative | ND | ND |
| Female (1) | Positive | Positive | Positive | Positive | Positive | |||||||
ND: not done; SG: Salivary glands; Int.: Intestines
Fig. 2Amplified 120pb kDNA products digested by the enzymes Hae III (a) and BstUI (b) in canine blood samples and cultures from the tick contents. Reference strain cultures of L. amazonensis (La), L. braziliensis (Lb), and L. infantum (Li); Cultures from R. sanguineus specimens obtained from dog I (c1), dog III (C3), and dog IV (c4); Blood samples of dog I (s1), dog II (s2), dog III (s3), dog IV (4); MP: molecular weight marker