Literature DB >> 26452368

Growth plate cartilage shows different strain patterns in response to static versus dynamic mechanical modulation.

Rosa Kaviani1,2, Irene Londono2, Stefan Parent2,3, Florina Moldovan2,4, Isabelle Villemure5,6.   

Abstract

Longitudinal growth of long bones and vertebrae occurs in growth plate cartilage. This process is partly regulated by mechanical forces, which are one of the underlying reasons for progression of growth deformities such as idiopathic adolescent scoliosis and early-onset scoliosis. This concept of mechanical modulation of bone growth is also exploited in the development of fusionless treatments of these deformities. However, the optimal loading condition for the mechanical modulation of growth plate remains to be identified. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of in vitro static versus dynamic modulation and of dynamic loading parameters, such as frequency and amplitude, on the mechanical responses and histomorphology of growth plate explants. Growth plate explants from distal ulnae of 4-week-old swines were extracted and randomly distributed among six experimental groups: baseline ([Formula: see text]), control ([Formula: see text]), static ([Formula: see text]) and dynamic ([Formula: see text]). For static and dynamic groups, mechanical modulation was performed in vitro using an Indexed CartiGen bioreactor. A stress relaxation test combined with confocal microscopy and digital image correlation was used to characterize the mechanical responses of each explant in terms of peak stress, equilibrium stress, equilibrium modulus of elasticity and strain pattern. Histomorphometrical measurements were performed on toluidine blue tissue sections using a semi-automatic custom-developed MATLAB toolbox. Results suggest that compared to dynamic modulation, static modulation changes the strain pattern of the tissue and thus is more detrimental for tissue biomechanics, while the histomorphological parameters are not affected by mechanical modulation. Also, under dynamic modulation, changing the frequency or amplitude does not affect the biomechanical response of the tissue. Results of this study will be useful in finding optimal and non-damaging parameters for the mechanical modulation of growth plate in fusionless treatments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital image correlation; Dynamic modulation; Growth plate; Histomorphometry; Mechanical characterization; Mechanical modulation; Static modulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26452368     DOI: 10.1007/s10237-015-0733-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol        ISSN: 1617-7940


  4 in total

Review 1.  Growing Pains: The Need for Engineered Platforms to Study Growth Plate Biology.

Authors:  Aleczandria S Tiffany; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 11.092

Review 2.  Properties of Cartilage-Subchondral Bone Junctions: A Narrative Review with Specific Focus on the Growth Plate.

Authors:  Masumeh Kazemi; John Leicester Williams
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Changes in growth plate extracellular matrix composition and biomechanics following in vitro static versus dynamic mechanical modulation.

Authors:  Rosa Kaviani; Irene Londono; Stefan Parent; Florina Moldovan; Isabelle Villemure
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.041

4.  Cyclic mechanical strain with high-tensile triggers autophagy in growth plate chondrocytes.

Authors:  Jin-Ming Zhang; Zheng-Gang Wang; Zhi-Yi He; Liang Qin; Jiang Wang; Wen-Tao Zhu; Jun Qi
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.