Benjamin A Lipsky1. 1. Division of Medical Sciences, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment for diabetic foot infections requires properly diagnosing infection, obtaining an appropriate specimen for culture, assessing for any needed surgical procedures and selecting an empiric antibiotic regimen. Therapy will often need to be modified based on results of culture and sensitivity testing. Because of excessive and inappropriate use of antibiotics for treating diabetic foot infections, resistance to the usually employed bacteria has been increasing to alarming levels. REVIEW: This article reviews recommendations from evidence-based guidelines, informed by results of systematic reviews, on treating diabetic foot infections. Data from the pre-antibiotic era reported rates of mortality of about 9% and of high-level leg amputations of about 70%. Outcomes have greatly improved with appropriate antibiotic therapy. While there are now many oral and parenteral antibiotic agents that have demonstrated efficacy in treating diabetic foot infections, the rate of infection with multidrug-resistant pathogens is growing. This problem requires a multi-focal approach, including providing education to both clinicians and patients, developing robust antimicrobial stewardship programmes and using new diagnostic and therapeutic technologies. Recently, new methods have been developed to find novel antibiotic agents and to resurrect old treatments, like bacteriophages, for treating these difficult infections. CONCLUSION: Medical and political leaders have recognized the serious global threat posed by the growing problem of antibiotic resistance. By a multipronged approach that includes exerting administrative pressure on clinicians to do the right thing, investing in new technologies and encouraging the profitable development of new antimicrobials, we may be able to stave off the coming 'post-antibiotic era'.
BACKGROUND: Treatment for diabetic foot infections requires properly diagnosing infection, obtaining an appropriate specimen for culture, assessing for any needed surgical procedures and selecting an empiric antibiotic regimen. Therapy will often need to be modified based on results of culture and sensitivity testing. Because of excessive and inappropriate use of antibiotics for treating diabetic foot infections, resistance to the usually employed bacteria has been increasing to alarming levels. REVIEW: This article reviews recommendations from evidence-based guidelines, informed by results of systematic reviews, on treating diabetic foot infections. Data from the pre-antibiotic era reported rates of mortality of about 9% and of high-level leg amputations of about 70%. Outcomes have greatly improved with appropriate antibiotic therapy. While there are now many oral and parenteral antibiotic agents that have demonstrated efficacy in treating diabetic foot infections, the rate of infection with multidrug-resistant pathogens is growing. This problem requires a multi-focal approach, including providing education to both clinicians and patients, developing robust antimicrobial stewardship programmes and using new diagnostic and therapeutic technologies. Recently, new methods have been developed to find novel antibiotic agents and to resurrect old treatments, like bacteriophages, for treating these difficult infections. CONCLUSION: Medical and political leaders have recognized the serious global threat posed by the growing problem of antibiotic resistance. By a multipronged approach that includes exerting administrative pressure on clinicians to do the right thing, investing in new technologies and encouraging the profitable development of new antimicrobials, we may be able to stave off the coming 'post-antibiotic era'.
Authors: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan; Sandeep Soin; Christopher A Beck; Alex Grier; James D Brodell; Charles C Lee; Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell; Frances Eun-Hyung Lee; Edward M Schwarz; John L Daiss Journal: Immunohorizons Date: 2020-06-22
Authors: Enrico M Zardi; Nunzio Montelione; Rossella C Vigliotti; Camilla Chello; Domenico M Zardi; Francesco Spinelli; Francesco Stilo Journal: Clin Med (Lond) Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 2.659
Authors: G Logan Draughn; C Leigh Allen; Patricia A Routh; Maria R Stone; Kelly R Kirker; Laura Boegli; Ryan M Schuchman; Keith E Linder; Ronald E Baynes; Garth James; Christian Melander; Angela Pollard; John Cavanagh Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 4.162
Authors: Diogo Casal; Inês Iria; José S Ramalho; Sara Alves; Eduarda Mota-Silva; Luís Mascarenhas-Lemos; Carlos Pontinha; Maria Guadalupe-Cabral; José Ferreira-Silva; Mário Ferraz-Oliveira; Valentina Vassilenko; João Goyri-O'Neill; Diogo Pais; Paula A Videira Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-05-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Bianca L Price; Andrew M Lovering; Frank L Bowling; Curtis B Dobson Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 5.191