Literature DB >> 26451991

Self-report Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire overestimates physical activity.

Kendra E Brett, Shanna Wilson, Zachary M Ferraro, Kristi B Adamo1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Physical activity (PA) research during pregnancy relies heavily on indirect/subjective measures of PA, which may be less accurate than directly measured PA. We tested whether the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) could accurately estimate PA by comparing PPAQ results to directly measured PA.
METHODS: In a sample of 29 women who completed the PPAQ, PA was directly measured in the second trimester of pregnancy using Actical® accelerometers (valid day = 10+ hours; 4-7 valid days). Activity variables from the PPAQ were calculated using all questions, and also by only considering the leisure time section. Women were classified as 'active' or 'non-active' using Canadian PA guidelines for adults (150 minutes moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA)/ week, bouts of 10+ minutes). Bonferroni corrections were used to adjust for multiple comparisons. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range).
RESULTS: The PPAQ overestimated MVPA by 12.12 (14.34) hours/week in the combined sample, and the difference remained substantial when investigating the non-active [overestimate = 11.54 (10.10) hrs/wk] and the active women [overestimate = 16 ± 11 hrs/wk] separately. PPAQ-measured PA variables did not correlate with any of their respective Actical®-measured variables (p > 0.008). The leisure time PPAQ questions overestimated MVPA by 1 ± 3 hrs/wk, with a positive correlation between PPAQ-leisure time MVPA and Actical®-measured MVPA (r = 0.565, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The PPAQ significantly overestimates MVPA and does not provide an accurate estimate of PA in pregnancy. While PPAQ leisure time questions may help distinguish trends in PA, data from subjective questionnaires may result in misinterpretation of relationships between prenatal PA and health outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Maternal health; accelerometry; physical activity; qualitative evaluation; quantitative evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26451991      PMCID: PMC6972273          DOI: 10.17269/cjph.106.4938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  22 in total

Review 1.  Physical exercise during pregnancy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simony L Nascimento; Fernanda G Surita; José G Cecatti
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.927

2.  Development and validation of a Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Authors:  Lisa Chasan-Taber; Michael D Schmidt; Dawn E Roberts; David Hosmer; Glenn Markenson; Patty S Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Impact of an exercise intervention on physical activity during pregnancy: the behaviors affecting baby and you study.

Authors:  Marquis Hawkins; Lisa Chasan-Taber; Bess Marcus; Edward Stanek; Barry Braun; Joe Ciccolo; Glenn Markenson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Quality control and data reduction procedures for accelerometry-derived measures of physical activity.

Authors:  Rachel Colley; Sarah Connor Gorber; Mark S Tremblay
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.796

5.  Cardiorespiratory fitness and smoking-related and total cancer mortality in men.

Authors:  Chong Do Lee; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Associations among gestational weight gain, physical activity, and pre-pregnancy body size with varying estimates of pre-pregnancy weight.

Authors:  Rebecca A Schlaff; Claudia Holzman; Kimbery S Maier; Karin A Pfeiffer; James M Pivarnik
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.372

7.  Measuring physical activity during pregnancy.

Authors:  Cheryce L Harrison; Russell G Thompson; Helena J Teede; Catherine B Lombard
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  French Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire compared with an accelerometer cut point to classify physical activity among pregnant obese women.

Authors:  Nadia Chandonnet; Didier Saey; Natalie Alméras; Isabelle Marc
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Measuring physical activity in pregnancy: a comparison of accelerometry and self-completion questionnaires in overweight and obese women.

Authors:  Ruth Bell; Peter W G Tennant; Catherine McParlin; Mark S Pearce; Ashley J Adamson; Judith Rankin; Stephen C Robson
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stéphanie A Prince; Kristi B Adamo; Meghan E Hamel; Jill Hardt; Sarah Connor Gorber; Mark Tremblay
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  13 in total

1.  The Need to Objectively Measure Physical Activity During Pregnancy: Considerations for Clinical Research and Public Health Impact.

Authors:  Eva Guérin; Zachary M Ferraro; Kristi B Adamo; Denis Prud'homme
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-05

Review 2.  Physical Activity during Pregnancy and Newborn Body Composition: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Brenna R Menke; Cathryn Duchette; Rachel A Tinius; Alexandria Q Wilson; Elizabeth A Altizer; Jill M Maples
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Misreporting of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Parents-to-Be: A Validation Study across Sex.

Authors:  Tom Deliens; Vickà Versele; Jasper Jehin; Eva D'Hondt; Yanni Verhavert; Peter Clarys; Roland Devlieger; Annick Bogaerts; Dirk Aerenhouts
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  The influence of physical activity during pregnancy on maternal, fetal or infant heart rate variability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pavel Dietz; Estelle D Watson; Matteo C Sattler; Wolfgang Ruf; Sylvia Titze; Mireille van Poppel
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Reliability and concurrent validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form among pregnant women.

Authors:  Birgitte Sanda; Ingvild Vistad; Lene Annette Hagen Haakstad; Sveinung Berntsen; Linda Reme Sagedal; Hilde Lohne-Seiler; Monica Klungland Torstveit
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-03-14

6.  Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.

Authors:  Matteo C Sattler; Johannes Jaunig; Estelle D Watson; Mireille N M van Poppel; Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Pavel Dietz
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Sensor Measures of Symmetry Quantify Upper Limb Movement in the Natural Environment Across the Lifespan.

Authors:  Beth A Smith; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.060

8.  Predicting who fails to meet the physical activity guideline in pregnancy: a prospective study of objectively recorded physical activity in a population-based multi-ethnic cohort.

Authors:  Kåre Rønn Richardsen; Ragnhild Sørum Falk; Anne Karen Jenum; Kjersti Mørkrid; Egil Wilhelm Martinsen; Yngvar Ommundsen; Sveinung Berntsen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Physical activity during pregnancy and infant's birth weight: results from the 3D Birth Cohort.

Authors:  Michèle Bisson; Jordie Croteau; Benjamin C Guinhouya; Emmanuel Bujold; François Audibert; William D Fraser; Isabelle Marc
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2017-06-19

10.  Trimester-Specific Dietary Intakes in a Sample of French-Canadian Pregnant Women in Comparison with National Nutritional Guidelines.

Authors:  Claudia Savard; Simone Lemieux; S John Weisnagel; Bénédicte Fontaine-Bisson; Claudia Gagnon; Julie Robitaille; Anne-Sophie Morisset
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.