Literature DB >> 26451699

Decoupling of greenhouse gas emissions from global agricultural production: 1970-2050.

Eskild H Bennetzen1, Pete Smith2, John R Porter1,3.   

Abstract

Since 1970 global agricultural production has more than doubled; contributing ~1/4 of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) burden in 2010. Food production must increase to feed our growing demands, but to address climate change, GHG emissions must decrease. Using an identity approach, we estimate and analyse past trends in GHG emission intensities from global agricultural production and land-use change and project potential future emissions. The novel Kaya-Porter identity framework deconstructs the entity of emissions from a mix of multiple sources of GHGs into attributable elements allowing not only a combined analysis of the total level of all emissions jointly with emissions per unit area and emissions per unit product. It also allows us to examine how a change in emissions from a given source contributes to the change in total emissions over time. We show that agricultural production and GHGs have been steadily decoupled over recent decades. Emissions peaked in 1991 at ~12 Pg CO2 -eq. yr(-1) and have not exceeded this since. Since 1970 GHG emissions per unit product have declined by 39% and 44% for crop- and livestock-production, respectively. Except for the energy-use component of farming, emissions from all sources have increased less than agricultural production. Our projected business-as-usual range suggests that emissions may be further decoupled by 20-55% giving absolute agricultural emissions of 8.2-14.5 Pg CO2 -eq. yr(-1) by 2050, significantly lower than many previous estimates that do not allow for decoupling. Beyond this, several additional costcompetitive mitigation measures could reduce emissions further. However, agricultural GHG emissions can only be reduced to a certain level and a simultaneous focus on other parts of the food-system is necessary to increase food security whilst reducing emissions. The identity approach presented here could be used as a methodological framework for more holistic food systems analysis.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate change; energy use; global agriculture; greenhouse gas emissions; land use; mitigation; sustainable intensification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26451699     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  13 in total

1.  Deceleration of China's human water use and its key drivers.

Authors:  Feng Zhou; Yan Bo; Philippe Ciais; Patrice Dumas; Qiuhong Tang; Xuhui Wang; Junguo Liu; Chunmiao Zheng; Jan Polcher; Zun Yin; Matthieu Guimberteau; Shushi Peng; Catherine Ottle; Xining Zhao; Jianshi Zhao; Qian Tan; Lei Chen; Huizhong Shen; Hui Yang; Shilong Piao; Hao Wang; Yoshihide Wada
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Supporting sustainability initiatives through biometeorology education and training.

Authors:  Michael J Allen; Jennifer Vanos; David M Hondula; Daniel J Vecellio; David Knight; Hamed Mehdipoor; Rebekah Lucas; Chris Fuhrmann; Hanna Lokys; Angela Lees; Sheila Tavares Nascimento; Andrew C W Leung; David R Perkins
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Which practices co-deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification?

Authors:  Pete Smith; Katherine Calvin; Johnson Nkem; Donovan Campbell; Francesco Cherubini; Giacomo Grassi; Vladimir Korotkov; Anh Le Hoang; Shuaib Lwasa; Pamela McElwee; Ephraim Nkonya; Nobuko Saigusa; Jean-Francois Soussana; Miguel Angel Taboada; Frances C Manning; Dorothy Nampanzira; Cristina Arias-Navarro; Matteo Vizzarri; Jo House; Stephanie Roe; Annette Cowie; Mark Rounsevell; Almut Arneth
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 13.211

4.  Structural change as a key component for agricultural non-CO2 mitigation efforts.

Authors:  Stefan Frank; Robert Beach; Petr Havlík; Hugo Valin; Mario Herrero; Aline Mosnier; Tomoko Hasegawa; Jared Creason; Shaun Ragnauth; Michael Obersteiner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Managing the global land resource.

Authors:  Pete Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Greenhouse gas emissions and energy use associated with production of individual self-selected US diets.

Authors:  Martin C Heller; Amelia Willits-Smith; Robert Meyer; Gregory A Keoleian; Donald Rose
Journal:  Environ Res Lett       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 6.793

7.  Effect of different forage-to-concentrate ratios on ruminal bacterial structure and real-time methane production in sheep.

Authors:  Runhang Li; Zhanwei Teng; Chaoli Lang; Haizhu Zhou; Weiguang Zhong; Zhibin Ban; Xiaogang Yan; Huaming Yang; Mohammed Hamdy Farouk; Yujie Lou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Position of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior: The Importance of Including Environmental Sustainability in Dietary Guidance.

Authors:  Donald Rose; Martin C Heller; Christina A Roberto
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.045

9.  Study on Mechanisms Underlying Changes in Agricultural Carbon Emissions: A Case in Jilin Province, China, 1998-2018.

Authors:  Hongpeng Guo; Boqun Fan; Chulin Pan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Offsetting unabated agricultural emissions with CO2 removal to achieve ambitious climate targets.

Authors:  Nicoletta Brazzola; Jan Wohland; Anthony Patt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.