Literature DB >> 26451520

Use of the lung cancer-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire EORTC QLQ-LC13 in clinical trials: A systematic review of the literature 20 years after its development.

Michael Koller1, Sophie Warncke1, Marianne J Hjermstad2, Juan Arraras3, Cecilia Pompili4, Amelie Harle5, Colin D Johnson6, Wei-Chu Chie7, Christian Schulz8, Florian Zeman1, Jan P van Meerbeeck9, Dagmara Kuliś10, Andrew Bottomley10.   

Abstract

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13) covers 13 typical symptoms of lung cancer patients and was the first module developed in conjunction with the EORTC core quality-of-life (QL) questionnaire. This review investigates how the module has been used and reported in cancer clinical trials in the 20 years since its publication. Thirty-six databases were searched with a prespecified algorithm. This search plus an additional hand search generated 770 hits, 240 of which were clinical studies. Two raters extracted data using a coding scheme. Analyses focused on the randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Of the 240 clinical studies that were identified using the LC13, 109 (45%) were RCTs. More than half of the RCTs were phase 3 trials (n = 58). Twenty RCTs considered QL as the primary endpoint, and 68 considered it as a secondary endpoint. QL results were addressed in the results section of the article (n = 89) or in the abstract (n = 92); and, in half of the articles, QL results were presented in the form of tables (n = 53) or figures (n = 43). Furthermore, QL results had an impact on the evaluation of the therapy that could be clearly demonstrated in the 47 RCTs that yielded QL differences between treatment and control groups. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 fulfilled its mission to be used as a standard instrument in lung cancer clinical trials. An update of the LC13 is underway to keep up with new therapeutic trends and to ensure optimized and relevant QL assessment in future trials.
© 2015 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trials; lung cancer; outcome; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26451520     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  13 in total

1.  Preliminary evidence on the uptake, use and benefits of the CONSORT-PRO extension.

Authors:  Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Julie Rouette; Melanie Calvert; Madeleine T King; Lori McLeod; Patricia Holch; Michael J Palmer; Michael Brundage
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Prospective evaluation of anxiety, depression and quality of life in medically inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jacek Rutkowski; Magdalena Szymanik; Maciej Blok; Joanna Kozaka; Renata Zaucha
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-04-21

3.  Patient reported outcomes following video assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) resection or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: protocol for an observational pilot study (LiLAC).

Authors:  Cecilia Pompili; Kevin N Franks; Alessandro Brunelli; Yusuf S Hussain; Patricia Holch; Matthew E Callister; Jonathan M Robson; Kostas Papagiannopoulos; Galina Velikova
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Newly diagnosed patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A clinical description of those with moderate to severe depressive symptoms.

Authors:  B L Andersen; T R Valentine; S B Lo; D P Carbone; C J Presley; P G Shields
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 5.  The Humanistic Burden of Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): A Systematic Review of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Literature.

Authors:  Bryan M Bennett; Jane R Wells; Charlotte Panter; Yong Yuan; John R Penrod
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Safety and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab Versus Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Martin Reck; Thomas Wehler; Francisco Orlandi; Naoyuki Nogami; Carlo Barone; Denis Moro-Sibilot; Mikhail Shtivelband; Jose Luis González Larriba; Jeffrey Rothenstein; Martin Früh; Wei Yu; Yu Deng; Shelley Coleman; Geetha Shankar; Hina Patel; Claudia Kelsch; Anthony Lee; Elisabeth Piault; Mark A Socinski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Gender effects on quality of life and symptom burden in patients with lung cancer: results from a prospective, cross-cultural, multi-center study.

Authors:  Myriam Koch; Marianne Jensen Hjermstad; Krzysztof Tomaszewski; Iwona Tomaszewska; Kjersti Hornslien; Amelie Harle; Juan Arraras; Ofir Morag; Cecilia Pompili; Georgios Ioannidis; Chiara Navarra; Weichu Chie; Colin Johnson; Thomas Bohrer; Annelies Janssens; Dagmara Kulis; Andrew Bottomley; Christian Schulz; Florian Zeman; Michael Koller
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Choosing the right survey: the lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Cecilia Pompili; Michael Koller; Galina Velikova
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Psychosocial Burden and Quality of Life of Lung Cancer Patients: Results of the EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-LC29 Questionnaire and Hornheide Screening Instrument.

Authors:  Myriam Koch; Laura Gräfenstein; Julia Karnosky; Christian Schulz; Michael Koller
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Efficacy and safety of Jianpishengsui for chemotherapy-related fatigue in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: study protocol for a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Zhiwei Xiao; Leihao Hu; Jietao Lin; Liming Lu; Xuewu Huang; Xiaoshu Zhu; Chiahshean Teo; Lizhu Lin
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.