Literature DB >> 26451236

Draft genome sequence of Halomonas meridiana R1t3 isolated from the surface microbiota of the Caribbean Elkhorn coral Acropora palmata.

Julie L Meyer1, Brian A Dillard1, John M Rodgers1, Kim B Ritchie2, Valerie J Paul3, Max Teplitski4.   

Abstract

Members of the gammaproteobacterial genus Halomonas are common in marine environments. Halomonas and other members of the Oceanospirillales have recently been identified as prominent members of the surface microbiota of reef-building corals. Halomonas meridiana strain R1t3 was isolated from the surface mucus layer of the scleractinian coral Acropora palmata in 2005 from the Florida Keys. This strain was chosen for genome sequencing to provide insight into the role of commensal heterotrophic bacteria in the coral holobiont. The draft genome consists of 290 scaffolds, totaling 3.5 Mbp in length and contains 3397 protein-coding genes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Commensal; Coral microbiome; Florida keys; Oceanospirillales; Surface mucus layer

Year:  2015        PMID: 26451236      PMCID: PMC4597393          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-015-0069-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

As the name denotes, the first isolated members of the genus were acquired from saline environments, and members of this halotolerant genus are increasingly isolated from a wide variety of marine environments. While the type species of was isolated from an Antarctic saline lake [1], several strains of this species have been isolated from Acropora corals, including strain R001 from Palk Bay, India [2] and strains R1t3 and R1t4 from A. palmata in the Florida Keys [3]. spp. have also been identified in surveys of uncultured bacteria in the surface microbiota of Acropora corals from the Caribbean and Indonesia [4], while the microbiota of A. millepora corals from the Great Barrier Reef are more commonly dominated by members of another genus in the order , [5]. Members of the are increasingly identified as important components of the stable, commensal coral microbiota, and the loss of commensal bacteria is often correlated with disease symptoms [6-8]. Coral-associated commensal bacteria may inhibit pathogens from colonizing the carbon-rich coral mucus layer by outcompeting non-commensals or through the active production of antimicrobial compounds, as previously demonstrated in strain R1t4 [3]. We chose strain R1t3 for whole genome sequencing as a representative coral commensal bacterium from Acropora corals. To date, only one other coral commensal bacterial strain has been sequenced: from the encrusting pore coral, , isolated from Taiwan [9].

Organism information

Classification and features

Within the polyphyletic family [10], strain R1t3 is a member of the Group 2 assemblage, which may represent a separate genus, however defining characteristics have not been clearly determined for this potential revision [11]. The small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequence of strain R1t3 is nearly indistinguishable from the sequence in type strains of both and (Fig. 1). Comparison of functional gene loci used in a previously published MLSA study [11] reveal that the loci secA, atpA, and rpoD are approximately 99 % identical between the two type strains and strain R1t3. In contrast, gene sequences for the gyrB locus are identical in the type strains, but only 87 % similar to the gyrB locus in strain R1t3. Strain R1t3 also exhibits high sequence identity to the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene to strain RA001 isolated from Acopora coral in India, and to uncultured retrieved from Acropora corals in Mexico and Indonesia (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree of select Halomonas type species and H. meridiana strain R1t3. The phylogenetic placement H. meridiana strain R1t3 in relation to select type species of marine and salt-tolerant Halomonas. Sequences from the 16S rRNA gene were aligned with MUSCLE and trimmed to 1154 bp, the length of the shortest sequence. Evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model [26]. Branch lengths are measured in the number of substitutions per site. Branch labels indicate the percentage of trees in which the associated taxa were clustered based on 500 bootstraps using MEGA v 5.2.2 [27]. Genome sequences are not currently available for any of the type strains included in this figure

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree of H. meridiana strain R1t3 and other Halomonas spp. associated with corals. Sequences from the 16S rRNA gene were aligned with MUSCLE and trimmed to 691 bp, the length of the shortest sequence. Evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model [26]. Branch lengths are measured in the number of substitutions per site. Branch labels indicate the percentage of trees in which the associated taxa were clustered based on 500 bootstraps using MEGA v 5.2.2 [27]. Genome sequences are currently available for H. meridiana strain R1t3 and Endozoicomonas montiporae strain LMG 24815

Phylogenetic tree of select Halomonas type species and H. meridiana strain R1t3. The phylogenetic placement H. meridiana strain R1t3 in relation to select type species of marine and salt-tolerant Halomonas. Sequences from the 16S rRNA gene were aligned with MUSCLE and trimmed to 1154 bp, the length of the shortest sequence. Evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model [26]. Branch lengths are measured in the number of substitutions per site. Branch labels indicate the percentage of trees in which the associated taxa were clustered based on 500 bootstraps using MEGA v 5.2.2 [27]. Genome sequences are not currently available for any of the type strains included in this figure Phylogenetic tree of H. meridiana strain R1t3 and other Halomonas spp. associated with corals. Sequences from the 16S rRNA gene were aligned with MUSCLE and trimmed to 691 bp, the length of the shortest sequence. Evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model [26]. Branch lengths are measured in the number of substitutions per site. Branch labels indicate the percentage of trees in which the associated taxa were clustered based on 500 bootstraps using MEGA v 5.2.2 [27]. Genome sequences are currently available for H. meridiana strain R1t3 and Endozoicomonas montiporae strain LMG 24815 While the strain was originally isolated using sterile coral mucus as a growth substrate [3], subsequent growth in both marine broth and Luria broth have been successful. strain R1t3 is aerobic, heterotrophic, and utilizes a wide range of carbon sources, including D-galatonic acid γ-lactone, D-galacturonic acid, D-glucosaminic acid, γ-hydroxybutyric acid, itaconic acid, glycyl-L-glutamic acid, L-phenylalanine, L-serine, L-threonine, phenylethylamine, α-cyclodextrin, Tween 80, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, D-cellobiose, i-erythritol, α-D-lactose, D-mannitol, putrescine, D,L-α-glycerol phosphate, glucose-1-phosphate, glycogen, Tween 40, and L-asparagine [12]. The carbon sources utilized by the type strains of and have been previously documented using Biolog GN2 plates [13] and carbon sources utilized by strain R1t3 (33E7) have been previously documented using Biolog Ecoplates [12]. Of the 23 substrates in common between the two types of Biolog plates, strain R1t3 can use 12 more substrates than and 16 more substrates than (see Additional file 1). strain R1t3 grows at 20 to 37 °C in culture, with the highest growth rates at 30 °C (Table 1). No growth was detected at 10 or 50 °C. Strain R1t3 grows at pH 7 to 9, with the highest growth rates at pH 8. Weak growth was detected at pH 6.5 and 10 and no growth occurred at pH 6 and 10.5. Cultures of strain R1t3 produce an unidentified acid during growth, and buffered growth medium at pH 10 was reduced to pH 8 within 24 h of inoculation. Strain R1t3 is halotolerant, exhibiting growth at 2 to 5 % (w/v) sea salt (Coral Pro Salts, Red Sea, Houston, TX) in liquid cultures and growth on 10 % sea salt marine agar. No growth was detected on 20 % sea salt marine agar or at 0 % (w/v) sea salt.
Table 1

Classification and general features of Halomonas meridiana strain R1t3 [28]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain Bacteria TAS [29]
Phylum Proteobacteria TAS [30]
Class Gammaproteobacteria TAS [31]
Order Oceanospirillales TAS [32]
Family Halomonadaceae TAS [33]
Genus Halomonas TAS [34]
Species Halomonas meridiana TAS [1]
strain: R1t3
Gram stainNegativeNAS
Cell shapeRod-shapedIDA
MotilityMotileIDA
SporulationNon-sporulatingNAS
Temperature range20–37 °CIDA
Optimum temperature30 °CIDA
pH range; Optimum7–9; 8IDA
Carbon sourceVariedTAS [12]
MIGS-6HabitatCoral, Marine hostTAS [3]
MIGS-6.3Salinity2–10 % NaCl (w/v)IDA
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementAerobicTAS [3]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipHost-associatedTAS [3]
MIGS-14PathogenicityNon-pathogenNAS
MIGS-4Geographic locationLooe Key Reef, FloridaTAS [3]
MIGS-5Sample collectionApril 2005TAS [3]
MIGS-4.1Latitude24° 40′ 48″ NTAS [3]
MIGS-4.2Longitude81° 14′ 24″ WTAS [3]
MIGS-4.3Depth~5 mTAS [3]
MIGS-4.4AltitudeNot applicable

aEvidence codes - IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [35]

Classification and general features of Halomonas meridiana strain R1t3 [28] aEvidence codes - IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [35] Cells of strain R1t3 are around 2 μm long and 1 μm wide (Fig. 3). Cells are motile and multi-flagellated, although the exact number of flagella per cell could not be determined. Colonies grown on marine agar plates are smooth, round, and beige.
Fig. 3

Transmission Electron Micrograph of typical Halomonas meridiana strain R1t3 cells. TEM micrograph of strain R1t3 cells grown in marine broth for 18 h and prepared for microscopy with a negative stain. TEM was performed on a Tecnai G2 Spirit 120 kV Transmission Electron Microscope at the University of Florida Electron Microscopy Core. Panel a shows a single cell, panel b shows multiple cells

Transmission Electron Micrograph of typical Halomonas meridiana strain R1t3 cells. TEM micrograph of strain R1t3 cells grown in marine broth for 18 h and prepared for microscopy with a negative stain. TEM was performed on a Tecnai G2 Spirit 120 kV Transmission Electron Microscope at the University of Florida Electron Microscopy Core. Panel a shows a single cell, panel b shows multiple cells

Symbiotaxonomy

strain R1t3 was isolated from the surface mucus layer of the scleractinian coral Lamarck 1816 (commonly known as Elkhorn Coral), from the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (Table 1). A. palmata historically dominated shallow Caribbean reefs, but is currently listed as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species due to extensive losses from white-band disease, climate change, and human-related impacts [14].

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

strain R1t3 was chosen for genome sequencing as a representative of the stable, commensal bacterial community inhabiting the dynamic surface mucus layer of an acroporid coral. The genome project information is available through the Genomes On Line Database [15] and the annotated genome sequences are publicly available through both the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) portal [16] and GenBank (Table 2).
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS 31Finishing qualityDraft
MIGS-28Libraries usedIllumina DNA-seq, PE library (~350 bp insert size)
MIGS 29Sequencing platformsIllumina HiSeq
MIGS 31.2Fold coverage23X
MIGS 30AssemblersIDBA-UD 1.1.0
MIGS 32Gene calling methodIMG: DOE-JGI Genome Annotation Pipeline, NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline
Locus TagIMG: Halo, NCBI: VE30
Genbank IDJZEM00000000
GenBank Date of Release04 March 2015
GOLD IDGp0103707
BIOPROJECTPRJNA269585
MIGS 13Source Material IdentifierNCMA B79
Project relevanceHost-associated
Genome sequencing project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

A culture of R1t3 (National Center for Marine Algae & Microbiota, Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, Accession # NCMA B79) was grown from a single colony at room temperature in 5 ml of Difco™ Marine Broth 2216 for 48 h. Cells were separated from the culture medium using microcentrifugation (12,000 rpm for 5 min) and genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from the pelleted cells with a Qiagen AllPrep DNA/RNA Micro Kit (Germantown, MD). The quality of the extracted gDNA was assessed by visualization on a 1 % agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and with a BioAnalyzer DNA chip, then sent to the University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research for library preparation and sequencing.

Genome sequencing and assembly

A genomic library was prepared with a TruSeq DNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq with the high-output, 100-bp paired-end protocol at the University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research. The average insert size was 337 bp with a DNA concentration of 192 nM. Sequencing reads were quality-filtered by trimming adaptors with cutadapt [17] and filtering reads for a minimum quality score of 30, minimum length of 100 bp, and discarding all sequences with ambiguous base calls using Sickle [18]. The unassembled, quality-filtered reads (41,481,885 read pairs) are publicly available through the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number SRX800904. Quality-filtered reads were interlaced with the shuffleSequences_fastq.pl script from velvet [19] and assembled with IDBA-UD [20] with k-mer sizes of 60, 70, and 80. This assembly yielded 290 contigs greater than 150 bp, a maximum contig length of 173,110 bp, and a total assembly length of 3.5 Mbp. The estimated Illumina sequencing coverage is 23×. To evaluate the quality of the assembly, unassembled reads were mapped to the 290 assembled contigs with bowtie2 [21] and alignment statistics were recovered with samtools [22]. The overall alignment rate was 99.9 %. The coverage of the genome was further assessed from the unassembled reads using nonpareil [23], which gave an estimated coverage of 100 %, indicating the sequencing effort was more than sufficient to capture all of the genome (4.2 Gbp actual effort, compared to 150 Mbp estimated required effort). Whole genome alignment of the draft genome sequences of strain R1t3 and strain LMG 24815 was performed with Mauve v2.4 [24].

Genome annotation

The draft genome assembly was submitted to IMG-ER [16] for annotation (Taxon ID 2588254266, publicly available) and discussion of genome content here is restricted to the IMG annotation. The 130 contigs greater than 500 bp were also submitted to GenBank (JZEM00000000) and annotated through the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Locus tags in IMG are prefaced by “Halo” while locus tags in GenBank are prefaced by “VE30”.

Genome properties

The draft genome of strain R1t3 is comprised of 290 scaffolds, with a total length of 3.5 Mbp (Table 3). Compared to the other 28 genomes of currently in the IMG database (as of April 2015), which range from 2.8 Mbp to 5.9 Mbp, the genome of strain R1t3 is smaller than the average genome size of 4.3 Mbp. The G + C content is 57 %, while the other genomes contain 52 to 68 % G + C. A total of 3526 genes were annotated through the IMG pipeline, with approximately 70 % genes assigned to Clusters of Orthologous Genes (Table 4). No pseudogenes or CRISPR repeats were detected.
Table 3

Genome statistics based on the IMG Annotation Pipeline

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)3,507,875100.00
DNA coding (bp)3,136,26689.41
DNA G + C (bp)1,986,94356.64
DNA scaffolds290100.00
Total genes3526100.00
Protein coding genes339796.34
RNA genes1293.66
Pseudo genes00.00
Genes in internal clusters254972.29
Genes with function prediction288781.88
Genes assigned to COGs246970.02
Genes with Pfam domains294583.52
Genes with signal peptides2597.35
Genes with transmembrane helices81123.00
CRISPR repeats00
Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories, based on the IMG Annotation Pipeline

CodeValue% ageDescription
J2077.53Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A10.04RNA processing and modification
K1796.51Transcription
L1154.18Replication, recombination and repair
B20.07Chromatin structure and dynamics
D321.16Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning
V632.29Defense mechanisms
T1324.80Signal transduction mechanisms
M1716.22Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N712.58Cell motility
U361.31Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O1284.65Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C1957.09Energy production and conversion
G1495.42Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E2539.20Amino acid transport and metabolism
F722.62Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1555.64Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I1364.95Lipid transport and metabolism
P1766.40Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q642.33Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R2027.35General function prediction only
S1475.35Function unknown
-105729.98Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Genome statistics based on the IMG Annotation Pipeline Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories, based on the IMG Annotation Pipeline The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Insights from the genome sequence

Like other members of the , strain R1t3 exhibits tolerance to a wide range of salinities that is likely mediated through the production of osmoprotectants, such as glycine betaine. Strain R1t3 has homologues of the two genes needed to produce glycine betaine. These genes, choline dehydrogenase (Halo_00078/VE30_01315) and betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (Halo_00077/VE30_01310) are part of a operon and are preceded by a choline ABC transporter periplasmic binding protein (Halo_00075/VE30_01300) and a TetR-family transcriptional regulator (Halo_00076/VE30_01305). The genome of strain R1t3 also contains a biosynthetic cluster (ectABC) for the production of the cyclic amino acid osmolyte, ectoine (Halo_01324/01325/01326, VE30_07080/07085/07090) as well as ectoine utilization genes eutED (Halo_01398/01399, VE30_04620/04625). The genome of strain R1t3 reflects its ability to utilize a wide range of carbon sources, including gene homologues for six different glycoside hydrolases (GH), used for breaking down complex carbohydrates. Four belong to GH family 13 (Halo_01730/VE30_08480, Halo_01736/VE30_08510, Halo_02655/VE30_13740, Halo_02891/VE30_RS10055), used for the breakdown of starch and glycogen. Single genes encode for GH family 3 (Halo_00185/VE30_02710) and GH32 (Halo_01720/VE30_08435) glycosidases, which act on oligosaccharides and fructan, respectively. The genome of strain R1t3 also contains homologues of genes required for glycerol transport across the membrane (glpSTPQV) (Halo_00080/00081/00082/00083/00085. VE30_01325/01330/01335/01340/01350) and glycerol degradation (glpAD) (Halo_00086/VE30_01355). The efficient use of multiple sources of carbon may be mediated through the widely conserved csrA carbon storage regulator (Halo_02194/VE30_11745) that is present in the genome. Previous work examining the utilization of coral mucus as a carbon source in this strain demonstrated that glucose and galactose are preferred carbon sources for strain R1t3 [25]. The addition of glucose to media containing high-molecular-weight components of coral mucus repressed the enzymatic activity of α-D-fucopyranosidase and the addition of galactose repressed α-L-galactopyranosidase activity. This catabolite repression is likely effected through the tctE/D two-component system (Halo_03014/VE30_14870, Halo_03015/VE30_14875) and tctCBA tricarboxylate transport membrane protein (Halo_03016/03017/03018, VE30_14880/14885/14890) encoded in the genome. Overall, the average nucleotide identity (ANI) between the IMG annotated draft genomes of H. meridiana strain R1t3 (3.5 Mbp) and LMG 24815 (5.6 Mbp) was 68.64 %. Orthologs shared between the two genomes were identified using a minimum of 60 % sequence identity and 70 % coverage. Despite the similarity of the ecological niches filled by these two bacteria, only 11 % of the genes in strain R1t3 (392 genes) have orthologs in the genome. Reducing the threshold to 30 % sequence similarity only increased the total proportion of orthologs to roughly 12.5 % (442 genes). Of the orthologs with at least 30 % sequence identity, three of the four starch/glycogen-degrading glycoside hydrolases and the single oligosaccharide-degrading GH in had orthologs in .

Conclusions

The draft genome sequence of strain R1t3 provides insight for the role of a representative strain of the commensal bacterial community associated with the surface mucus layer of an Acropora coral. Strain R1t3 can utilize a wide range of carbon sources, as demonstrated in culture and supported by genome content.
  24 in total

1.  IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth.

Authors:  Yu Peng; Henry C M Leung; S M Yiu; Francis Y L Chin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Characterization of geographically distinct bacterial communities associated with coral mucus produced by Acropora spp. and Porites spp.

Authors:  B A McKew; A J Dumbrell; S D Daud; L Hepburn; E Thorpe; L Mogensen; C Whitby
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  A detailed phenotypic characterisation of the type strains of Halomonas species.

Authors:  Jua Antonio Mata; José Martínez-Cánovas; Emilia Quesada; Victoria Béjar
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.022

7.  Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  K Tamura; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  The integrated microbial genomes (IMG) system.

Authors:  Victor M Markowitz; Frank Korzeniewski; Krishna Palaniappan; Ernest Szeto; Greg Werner; Anu Padki; Xueling Zhao; Inna Dubchak; Philip Hugenholtz; Iain Anderson; Athanasios Lykidis; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Ivanova; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  16SrDNA Pyrosequencing of the Mediterranean Gorgonian Paramuricea clavata Reveals a Link among Alterations in Bacterial Holobiont Members, Anthropogenic Influence and Disease Outbreaks.

Authors:  Luigi Vezzulli; Elisabetta Pezzati; Carla Huete-Stauffer; Carla Pruzzo; Carlo Cerrano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Coral evolutionary responses to microbial symbioses.

Authors:  Madeleine J H van Oppen; Mónica Medina
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Complete genome sequence of the halophilic PHA-producing bacterium Halomonas sp. SF2003: insights into its biotechnological potential.

Authors:  Tatiana Thomas; Anne Elain; Alexis Bazire; Stéphane Bruzaud
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Comparative genomics of Paracoccus sp. SM22M-07 isolated from coral mucus: insights into bacteria-host interactions.

Authors:  Camila Carlos; Letícia Bianca Pereira; Laura Maria Mariscal Ottoboni
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.886

4.  Identification of New Halomonas Strains from Food-related Environments.

Authors:  Ayaka Tsuji; Yasuko Takei; Taku Nishimura; Yoshinao Azuma
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.