Literature DB >> 26451002

Absorption, Metabolism, Excretion, and the Contribution of Intestinal Metabolism to the Oral Disposition of [14C]Cobimetinib, a MEK Inhibitor, in Humans.

Ryan H Takahashi1, Edna F Choo2, Shuguang Ma2, Susan Wong2, Jason Halladay2, Yuzhong Deng2, Isabelle Rooney2, Mary Gates2, Cornelis E C A Hop2, S Cyrus Khojasteh2, Mark J Dresser2, Luna Musib2.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of cobimetinib, a MEK inhibitor, were characterized in healthy male subjects (n = 6) following a single 20 mg (200 μCi) oral dose. Unchanged cobimetinib and M16 (glycine conjugate of hydrolyzed cobimetinib) were the major circulating species, accounting for 20.5% and 18.3% of the drug-related material in plasma up to 48 hours postdose, respectively. Other circulating metabolites were minor, accounting for less than 10% of drug-related material in plasma. The total recovery of the administered radioactivity was 94.3% (±1.6%, S.D.) with 76.5% (±2.3%) in feces and 17.8% (±2.5%) in urine. Metabolite profiling indicated that cobimetinib had been extensively metabolized with only 1.6% and 6.6% of the dose remaining as unchanged drug in urine and feces, respectively. In vitro phenotyping experiments indicated that CYP3A4 was predominantly responsible for metabolizing cobimetinib. From this study, we concluded that cobimetinib had been well absorbed (fraction absorbed, Fa = 0.88). Given this good absorption and the previously determined low hepatic clearance, the systemic exposures were lower than expected (bioavailability, F = 0.28). We hypothesized that intestinal metabolism had strongly attenuated the oral bioavailability of cobimetinib. Supporting this hypothesis, the fraction escaping gut wall elimination (Fg) was estimated to be 0.37 based on F and Fa from this study and the fraction escaping hepatic elimination (Fh) from the absolute bioavailability study (F = Fa × Fh × Fg). Physiologically based pharmacokinetics modeling also showed that intestinal clearance had to be included to adequately describe the oral profile. These collective data suggested that cobimetinib was well absorbed following oral administration and extensively metabolized with intestinal first-pass metabolism contributing to its disposition.
Copyright © 2015 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26451002     DOI: 10.1124/dmd.115.066282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cobimetinib Plus Vemurafenib: A Review in BRAF (V600) Mutation-Positive Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Utility of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling in oncology drug development and its accuracy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Teerachat Saeheng; Kesara Na-Bangchang; Juntra Karbwang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations in the (Modern) Treatment of Melanoma.

Authors:  Hannah Yejin Kim; Parth J Upadhyay; Alia Fahmy; Xiaoman Liu; Janna K Duong; Alan V Boddy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Evaluation of Cytochrome P450 3A4-Mediated Drug-Drug Interaction Potential for Cobimetinib Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation.

Authors:  Nageshwar R Budha; Tao Ji; Luna Musib; Steve Eppler; Mark Dresser; Yuan Chen; Jin Y Jin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Safe handling of oral antineoplastic medications: Focus on targeted therapeutics in the home setting.

Authors:  Yaakov Cass; Thomas H Connor; Alexander Tabachnik
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 1.809

Review 6.  Drug Exposure to Establish Pharmacokinetic-Response Relationships in Oncology.

Authors:  Belén P Solans; María Jesús Garrido; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  RAS/MAPK Pathway Driver Alterations Are Significantly Associated With Oncogenic KIT Mutations in Germ-cell Tumors.

Authors:  Douglas A Mata; Soo-Ryum Yang; Donna C Ferguson; Ying Liu; Rohit Sharma; Jamal K Benhamida; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Debyani Chakravarty; David B Solit; Satish K Tickoo; Sounak Gupta; Maria E Arcila; Marc Ladanyi; Darren R Feldman; Victor E Reuter; Chad M Vanderbilt
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Reviewing the role of healthy volunteer studies in drug development.

Authors:  Joyson J Karakunnel; Nam Bui; Latha Palaniappan; Keith T Schmidt; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Briggs Morrison; William D Figg; Shivaani Kummar
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Cabozantinib and dasatinib synergize to induce tumor regression in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hui-Wen Lue; Daniel S Derrick; Soumya Rao; Ahna Van Gaest; Larry Cheng; Jennifer Podolak; Samantha Lawson; Changhui Xue; Devin Garg; Ralph White; Christopher W Ryan; Justin M Drake; Anna Ritz; Laura M Heiser; George V Thomas
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2021-05-07

10.  Cobimetinib and trametinib inhibit platelet MEK but do not cause platelet dysfunction.

Authors:  Amanda J Unsworth; Alexander P Bye; Neline Kriek; Tanya Sage; Ashley A Osborne; Dillon Donaghy; Jonathan M Gibbins
Journal:  Platelets       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.