| Literature DB >> 26450603 |
Ubaidullo Kurbon1, Hamza Dodariyon1, Abdumalik Davlatov1, Sitora Janobilova1, Amu Therwath2, Massoud Mirshahi3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Management of asthma in chronically affected patients is a serious health problem. Our aim was to show that surgical treatment of chronic bronchial asthma by unilateral resection of the internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (ib-SLN) is an adequateand lasting remedial response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, 41 (26 male and 15 female) patients with bronchial chronic asthma were treated surgically during the period between 2005 and 2013. It consisted of a unilateral resection of the ib-SLN under optical zoom, on patients placed in supinator position. 35 patients (24 male and 11 female) who were un-operated were included as a control.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26450603 PMCID: PMC4599809 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-015-0093-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Surg ISSN: 1471-2482 Impact factor: 2.102
A and B: characteristics of operated patients (1A) and non-operated patients as control group (1B)
| A | |||
| MALE | FEMALE | AGE OF PATIENTS M ± SD | DURATION OF ASTHMA/YEAR M ± SD |
| 26 | 15 | 38,5 ± 13,8 | 13,2 ± 9,4 |
| B | |||
| MALE | FEMALE | AGE OF PATIENTSM ± SD | DURATION OF ASTHMA/YEAR M ± SD |
| 24 | 11 | 39,6 ± 13,4 | 13,7 ± 9,2 |
Fig. 1Position and anatomic description of trigonumcaroticumarea: a The position of oblique-transverse approach (greenline) to anatomic projections on the neck. b The position of inner branch of superior laryngeal nerve and artery
Fig. 2a Anatomic position of inner branch of superior laryngeal nerve (1), ramus intern (2), ramus extern (3). b use of optic magnification × 2.5 for visualization of inner branch of superior laryngeal nerve. c Internal branch of Laryngeal superior nerve (curved form) penetrates the side of the thyro-hyoid membrane into the cavity of the larynx. d In the act of swallowing, when the whole complex anatomical rises nerve just straightened
Objective information from spirometry in pre- and post- operated patients
| Pre-operation | Post-operation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | FEV1 | PEF | FEV1 | PEF |
| Good results 11 (26 %) | 55 ± 10 % | 42 ± 9 % | 81 ± 4 % | 71 ± 4 % |
| Satisfactory 22 (53.6 %) | 42.5 ± 8 % | 35 ± 5 % | 59 ± 6 % | 41 ± 6 % |
| Ineffective 8 (20 %) | 35 ± 6 % | 26 ± 9 % | No any changes | |
| Hematoma | Not occurred | |||
| Aspiration | Not occurred | |||
| loss of cough reflex | Not occurred | |||
| loss of phonation | Not occurred | |||
FEV1: forced expiratory volume, PEF: peak expiratory flow
Medical situation of operated patients compared with control. 31 of 41 patients were used corticosteroids
| Operated patients | Control Only medical treatment | |
|---|---|---|
| Stopped taking corticosteroids | 19/31patients (61 %) | 0 |
| Shortening of reception salbutamol | 22/41patients, 1–3 times/week | all control patients, 3–5 times/day |
| Duration of hospitalization | 1–3 days | 5–10 days |
| decrease of asthma attack | 1–2 per month | 1–3 in the week |