Literature DB >> 2645015

Computer-aided diagnosis: a review.

G C Sutton1.   

Abstract

Fifteen years ago, computer-aided diagnosis of the acute abdomen promised much. Today it is little used. Studies have been flowed by poor trial design, bias, selective reporting of results, statistical naivety and spurious conclusions. The computer system lacks 'common sense' and is less accurate than clinicians. Yet its introduction has been associated with improved patient management and outcome. Much of the effect arises from structured data collection methods and some from audit feedback to clinicians. It is on these innovations, not on the computer, that future work should focus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2645015     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800760126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  10 in total

1.  Audit of computer-aided diagnosis of abdominal pain in accident and emergency departments.

Authors:  P A Stonebridge; P Freeland; J B Rainey; D A Macleod
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1992-09

2.  A critical appraisal of the literature on the effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcomes.

Authors:  K B Langton; M E Johnston; R B Haynes; A Mathieu
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1992

3.  A decision-making learning and assessment tool in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sudip K Sarker; Saif Rehman; Meera Ladwa; Avril Chang; Charles Vincent
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Strategies for reducing inappropriate laparotomy rate in the acute abdomen.

Authors:  S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-02

Review 5.  Recent developments in computer-assisted diagnosis of putative adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  C A Naranjo; K L Lanctôt
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Are computer diagnostic assistants useful tools for clinicians and educators?

Authors:  D E Dewitt; A S Kanter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Acute nonspecific abdominal pain: A randomized, controlled trial comparing early laparoscopy versus clinical observation.

Authors:  Mario Morino; Luca Pellegrino; Elisabetta Castagna; Eleonora Farinella; Patrizio Mao
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  [Medical expert systems and clinical needs].

Authors:  H P Buscher
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1991-10-18

9.  How does computer-aided diagnosis improve the management of acute abdominal pain?

Authors:  J Wellwood; S Johannessen; D J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Decision making in patients with acute abdominal pain at a university and at a rural hospital: does the value of abdominal sonography differ?

Authors:  Aristomenis K Exadaktylos; Charlotte Sadowski-Cron; Paul Mäder; Monika Weissmann; Hans Peter Dinkel; Marco Negri; Heinz Zimmermann
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 5.469

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.