BACKGROUND: Our recent drug interaction trial with clopidogrel shows that morphine decreases the concentrations and pharmacodynamic effects of clopidogrel, which could lead to treatment failure in susceptible individuals. We hypothesized that the pharmacodynamic consequences of drug-drug interactions would be less between morphine and ticagrelor. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Twenty-four healthy subjects received a loading dose of 180 mg ticagrelor together with placebo or 5 mg morphine intravenously in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Pharmacokinetics were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and ticagrelor pharmacodynamic effects were measured by platelet function tests (whole blood platelet aggregation: multiplate, platelet plug formation: PFA-100, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay). RESULTS: Concomitant i.v. injection of morphine slows drug resorption of ticagrelor and its active metabolite (P < 0·05) by 1 h and decreases plasma levels of ticagrelor and its active metabolite by 25-31% (P ≤ 0·03) and the drug exposure (area under the curve) by 22-23% (P ≤ 0·01). Importantly, however, the pharmacodynamic effects of ticagrelor on platelet aggregation in whole blood, platelet plug formation and VASP phosphorylation are not affected by morphine. CONCLUSIONS:Morphine co-administration moderately decreases ticagrelor plasma concentrations but does not inhibit its pharmacodynamic effects in healthy volunteers within 6 h after drug administration. Limitations of our trial include the investigation in healthy volunteers under standardized conditions, which does not necessarily reflect a realistic emergency scenario.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Our recent drug interaction trial with clopidogrel shows that morphine decreases the concentrations and pharmacodynamic effects of clopidogrel, which could lead to treatment failure in susceptible individuals. We hypothesized that the pharmacodynamic consequences of drug-drug interactions would be less between morphine and ticagrelor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four healthy subjects received a loading dose of 180 mg ticagrelor together with placebo or 5 mg morphine intravenously in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Pharmacokinetics were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and ticagrelor pharmacodynamic effects were measured by platelet function tests (whole blood platelet aggregation: multiplate, platelet plug formation: PFA-100, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay). RESULTS: Concomitant i.v. injection of morphine slows drug resorption of ticagrelor and its active metabolite (P < 0·05) by 1 h and decreases plasma levels of ticagrelor and its active metabolite by 25-31% (P ≤ 0·03) and the drug exposure (area under the curve) by 22-23% (P ≤ 0·01). Importantly, however, the pharmacodynamic effects of ticagrelor on platelet aggregation in whole blood, platelet plug formation and VASP phosphorylation are not affected by morphine. CONCLUSIONS:Morphine co-administration moderately decreases ticagrelor plasma concentrations but does not inhibit its pharmacodynamic effects in healthy volunteers within 6 h after drug administration. Limitations of our trial include the investigation in healthy volunteers under standardized conditions, which does not necessarily reflect a realistic emergency scenario.
Authors: Jacek Kubica; Piotr Adamski; Jerzy R Ładny; Jarosław Kaźmierczak; Tomasz Fabiszak; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Robert Gajda; Mariusz Gąsior; Zbigniew Gąsior; Robert Gil; Jarosław Gorący; Stefan Grajek; Leszek Gromadziński; Marcin Gruchała; Grzegorz Grześk; Piotr Hoffman; Miłosz J Jaguszewski; Marianna Janion; Piotr Jankowski; Zbigniew Kalarus; Jarosław D Kasprzak; Andrzej Kleinrok; Wacław Kochman; Aldona Kubica; Wiktor Kuliczkowski; Jacek Legutko; Maciej Lesiak; Klaudiusz Nadolny; Eliano P Navarese; Piotr Niezgoda; Małgorzata Ostrowska; Przemysław Paciorek; Jolanta Siller-Matula; Łukasz Szarpak; Dariusz Timler; Adam Witkowski; Wojciech Wojakowski; Andrzej Wysokiński; Marzenna Zielińska Journal: Cardiol J Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 3.487
Authors: Jacek Kubica; Piotr Adamski; Piotr Niezgoda; Aldona Kubica; Przemysław Podhajski; Malwina Barańska; Julia M Umińska; Łukasz Pietrzykowski; Małgorzata Ostrowska; Jolanta M Siller-Matula; Jolita Badarienė; Stanisław Bartuś; Andrzej Budaj; Sławomir Dobrzycki; Łukasz Fidor; Mariusz Gąsior; Jacek Gessek; Marek Gierlotka; Robert Gil; Jarosław Gorący; Paweł Grzelakowski; Tomasz Hajdukiewicz; Miłosz Jaguszewski; Marianna Janion; Jarosław Kasprzak; Adam Kern; Artur Klecha; Andrzej Kleinrok; Wacław Kochman; Bartosz Krakowiak; Jacek Legutko; Maciej Lesiak; Marcin Nosal; Grzegorz Piotrowski; Andrzej Przybylski; Tomasz Roleder; Grzegorz Skonieczny; Grzegorz Sobieszek; Agnieszka Tycińska; Dariusz Wojciechowski; Wojciech Wojakowski; Jarosław Wójcik; Marzenna Zielińska; Aleksander Żurakowski; Giuseppe Specchia; Diana A Gorog; Eliano P Navarese Journal: Cardiol J Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 2.737
Authors: Piotr Adamski; Małgorzata Ostrowska; Joanna Sikora; Karolina Obońska; Katarzyna Buszko; Magdalena Krintus; Grażyna Sypniewska; Michał Piotr Marszałł; Marek Koziński; Jacek Kubica Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Khalil Ibrahim; Rohan Shah; Rakesh R Goli; Thomas S Kickler; William A Clarke; Rani K Hasan; Roger S Blumenthal; David R Thiemann; Jon R Resar; Steven P Schulman; John W McEvoy Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2018-07-04 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Michał J Kubisa; Mateusz P Jezewski; Aleksandra Gasecka; Jolanta M Siller-Matula; Marek Postuła Journal: Ther Clin Risk Manag Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 2.423