Literature DB >> 26448064

Reducing acquisition time in clinical MRI by data undersampling and compressed sensing reconstruction.

Kieren Grant Hollingsworth1.   

Abstract

MRI is often the most sensitive or appropriate technique for important measurements in clinical diagnosis and research, but lengthy acquisition times limit its use due to cost and considerations of patient comfort and compliance. Once an image field of view and resolution is chosen, the minimum scan acquisition time is normally fixed by the amount of raw data that must be acquired to meet the Nyquist criteria. Recently, there has been research interest in using the theory of compressed sensing (CS) in MR imaging to reduce scan acquisition times. The theory argues that if our target MR image is sparse, having signal information in only a small proportion of pixels (like an angiogram), or if the image can be mathematically transformed to be sparse then it is possible to use that sparsity to recover a high definition image from substantially less acquired data. This review starts by considering methods of k-space undersampling which have already been incorporated into routine clinical imaging (partial Fourier imaging and parallel imaging), and then explains the basis of using compressed sensing in MRI. The practical considerations of applying CS to MRI acquisitions are discussed, such as designing k-space undersampling schemes, optimizing adjustable parameters in reconstructions and exploiting the power of combined compressed sensing and parallel imaging (CS-PI). A selection of clinical applications that have used CS and CS-PI prospectively are considered. The review concludes by signposting other imaging acceleration techniques under present development before concluding with a consideration of the potential impact and obstacles to bringing compressed sensing into routine use in clinical MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26448064     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/21/R297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  41 in total

Review 1.  Noncontrast MR angiography: An update.

Authors:  Robert R Edelman; Ioannis Koktzoglou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Compressed sensing MRI of different organs: ready for clinical daily practice?

Authors:  Bénédicte Marie Anne Delattre; Sana Boudabbous; Catrina Hansen; Angeliki Neroladaki; Anne-Lise Hachulla; Maria Isabel Vargas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Advances in PET/MR instrumentation and image reconstruction.

Authors:  Jorge Cabello; Sibylle I Ziegler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Compressed Sensing-Sensitivity Encoding (CS-SENSE) Accelerated Brain Imaging: Reduced Scan Time without Reduced Image Quality.

Authors:  J E Vranic; N M Cross; Y Wang; D S Hippe; E de Weerdt; M Mossa-Basha
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Utility of deep learning super-resolution in the context of osteoarthritis MRI biomarkers.

Authors:  Akshay S Chaudhari; Kathryn J Stevens; Jeff P Wood; Amit K Chakraborty; Eric K Gibbons; Zhongnan Fang; Arjun D Desai; Jin Hyung Lee; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of mouse brain microstructure.

Authors:  Nian Wang; Jieying Zhang; Gary Cofer; Yi Qi; Robert J Anderson; Leonard E White; G Allan Johnson
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 3.270

7.  Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data.

Authors:  Kerstin Hammernik; Teresa Klatzer; Erich Kobler; Michael P Recht; Daniel K Sodickson; Thomas Pock; Florian Knoll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Sparse Reconstruction Techniques in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Methods, Applications, and Challenges to Clinical Adoption.

Authors:  Alice C Yang; Madison Kretzler; Sonja Sudarski; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Introduction of a pseudo demons force to enhance deformation range for robust reconstruction of super-resolution time-resolved 4DMRI.

Authors:  Guang Li; August Sun; Xingyu Nie; Jason Moody; Kirk Huang; Shirong Zhang; Satyam Sharma; Joseph Deasy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Diagnostic interchangeability of deep convolutional neural networks reconstructed knee MR images: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Naveen Subhas; Hongyu Li; Mingrui Yang; Carl S Winalski; Joshua Polster; Nancy Obuchowski; Kenji Mamoto; Ruiying Liu; Chaoyi Zhang; Peizhou Huang; Sunil Kumar Gaire; Dong Liang; Bowen Shen; Xiaojuan Li; Leslie Ying
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.