Literature DB >> 26447869

Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening in the United States: Changing Trends Based on a Survey of Society of Thoracic Radiology Members.

Jan M Eberth1, Erica Sercy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether practices and protocols regarding low-dose CT (LDCT) screening for lung cancer have changed among Society of Thoracic Radiology (STR) members after the recent release of recommendations in favor of LDCT screening by organizations such as the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We administered an online survey to members of the STR in 2013, before the release of the USPSTF recommendations, to determine the availability and attributes of screening programs at their institutions. Here we report results of a follow-up survey conducted using the same protocols but distributed in November 2014, after the release of the guidelines. We filtered returned surveys such that each institution was represented only once in the data.
RESULTS: Of the 75 unique institutions represented in the 2014 survey, 62 (83%) had an active screening program, compared with 66% of institutions in the original 2013 survey. In addition, approximately half of the institutions reported >50 patients screened in the 12 months before administration of the 2014 survey compared with 28% in 2013. In 2014, most institutions without an active screening program were considering implementing one.
CONCLUSIONS: Our follow-up survey showed several trends in the utilization of LDCT screening for lung cancer between 2013 and 2014: in 2014, an increased number of sites had active screening programs, increased numbers of patients were screened, and there was greater integration of smoking cessation counseling as part of the screening programs at individual institutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26447869     DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Imaging        ISSN: 0883-5993            Impact factor:   3.000


  8 in total

1.  Using lessons from breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening to inform the development of lung cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Jane J Kim; Ethan A Halm; Rachel M Ballard; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Lung Cancer Screening Practices in North Carolina CT Facilities.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Laura M Jones; Mary W Marsh; Thad Benefield; M Patricia Rivera; Paul L Molina
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Challenges Implementing Lung Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Steven B Zeliadt; Richard M Hoffman; Genevieve Birkby; Jan M Eberth; Alison T Brenner; Daniel S Reuland; Susan A Flocke
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.604

4.  Patient Perspectives on Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening, New Mexico, 2014.

Authors:  Shiraz I Mishra; Andrew L Sussman; Ambroshia M Murrietta; Christina M Getrich; Robert Rhyne; Richard E Crowell; Kathryn L Taylor; Ellen J Reifler; Pamela H Wescott; Ali I Saeed; Richard M Hoffman
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Geographical Variation and Factors Associated with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Manitoba.

Authors:  David E Dawe; Harminder Singh; Lahiru Wickramasinghe; Marshall W Pitz; Mahmoud Torabi
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 6.  YAP and TAZ in Lung Cancer: Oncogenic Role and Clinical Targeting.

Authors:  Federica Lo Sardo; Sabrina Strano; Giovanni Blandino
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-06       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Creating Wikipedia articles on health and technology topics can empower the writers and benefit the community.

Authors:  Khen Moscovici; Gal Ben Arie; Ilan Shelef; Adina Kalet
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: analysis of a US commercial insurance claims database.

Authors:  Michael S Broder; Beilei Cai; Eunice Chang; Maureen P Neary
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.317

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.