Literature DB >> 26447737

Marital status, education, and income in relation to the risk of esophageal and gastric cancer by histological type and site.

Jesper Lagergren1,2, Gunnar Andersson3, Mats Talbäck4, Sven Drefahl3, Erik Bihagen5, Juho Härkönen3, Maria Feychting4, Rickard Ljung5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Marital status, income, and education might influence the risk of esophageal and gastric cancer, but the literature is limited. A large study addressing subtypes of these tumors was used to clarify these associations.
METHODS: A nationwide, Swedish population-based cohort study from 1991 to 2010 included individuals who were 50 years old or older. Data on exposures, covariates, and outcomes were obtained from well-maintained registers. Four esophagogastric tumor subtypes were analyzed in combination and separately: esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, cardia adenocarcinoma, and noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma. Poisson regression was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Analyses were stratified by sex and adjusted for confounders.
RESULTS: Among 4,734,227 participants (60,634,007 person-years), 24,095 developed esophageal or gastric cancer. In comparison with individuals in a long marriage, increased IRRs were found among participants who were in a shorter marriage or were never married, remarried, divorced, or widowed. These associations were indicated for each tumor subtype but were generally stronger for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Higher education and income were associated with decreased IRRs in a seemingly dose-response manner and similarly for each subtype. In comparison with the completion of only primary school, higher tertiary education rendered an IRR of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.60-0.69) for men and an IRR of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.61-0.75) for women. Comparing participants in the highest and lowest income brackets (highest 20% vs lowest 20%) revealed an IRR of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.70-0.79) for men and an IRR of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.91) for women.
CONCLUSIONS: Divorce, widowhood, living alone, low educational attainment, and low income increase the risk of each subtype of esophageal and gastric cancer. These associations require attention when high-risk individuals are being identified. Cancer 2016;122:207-212.
© 2015 American Cancer Society. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  economic factors; epidemiology; esophageal neoplasm; esophagogastric neoplasm; etiology; gastric neoplasm; risk factors; social factors

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26447737     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  32 in total

1.  [Economic aspects of oncological esophageal surgery : Centralization is essential].

Authors:  N von Dercks; I Gockel; M Mehdorn; D Lorenz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Non-coding RNAs underlying chemoresistance in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Arash Poursheikhani; Zahra Bahmanpour; Ehsan Razmara; Ladan Mashouri; Mohammad Taheri; Dorsa Morshedi Rad; Hassan Yousefi; Amirreza Bitaraf; Sadegh Babashah
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 6.730

3.  Application of nursing intervention based on the IKAP model in self-management of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ling Yin; Wenhong Zhang; Lianhua Liu; Lihua Guo; Meihua Guo; Xiao He; Lixia Zhu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.940

4.  The mediating role of combined lifestyle factors on the relationship between education and gastric cancer in the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project.

Authors:  Gianfranco Alicandro; Paola Bertuccio; Giulia Collatuzzo; Claudio Pelucchi; Rossella Bonzi; Linda M Liao; Charles S Rabkin; Rashmi Sinha; Eva Negri; Michela Dalmartello; David Zaridze; Dmitry Maximovich; Jesus Vioque; Manoli Garcia de la Hera; Shoichiro Tsugane; Akihisa Hidaka; Gerson Shigueaki Hamada; Lizbeth López-Carrillo; Raúl Ulises Hernández-Ramírez; Reza Malekzadeh; Farhad Pourfarzi; Zuo-Feng Zhang; Robert C Kurtz; M Constanza Camargo; Maria Paula Curado; Nuno Lunet; Paolo Boffetta; Carlo La Vecchia
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 9.075

5.  Associations of Education Level With Survival Outcomes and Treatment Receipt in Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jiaxuan Xu; Shuhui Du; Xiaoqing Dong
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 6.  Social group disparities in the incidence and prognosis of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shao-Hua Xie; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  Socioeconomic Disparities in Gastric Cancer and Identification of a Single SES Variable for Predicting Risk.

Authors:  Srawani Sarkar; Marc J Dauer; Haejin In
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2021-01-06

8.  Factors associated with access and approach to esophagectomy for cancer: a National Cancer Database study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Blears; Hiran C Fernando; James Shahoud; Benny Weksler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Geographic and Socioeconomic Disparity of Gastric Cancer Patients in Canada.

Authors:  Leila Cattelan; Feras M Ghazawi; Michelle Le; François Lagacé; Elham Rahme; Andrei Zubarev; Denis Sasseville; Ivan V Litvinov; Kevin A Waschke; Elena Netchiporouk
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Marital status and survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jie-Jie Jin; Wei Wang; Fa-Xiang Dai; Zi-Wen Long; Hong Cai; Xiao-Wen Liu; Ye Zhou; Hua Huang; Ya-Nong Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.