Literature DB >> 26447198

Amazon river dolphins (Inia geoffrensis) use a high-frequency short-range biosonar.

Michael Ladegaard1, Frants Havmand Jensen2, Mafalda de Freitas3, Vera Maria Ferreira da Silva4, Peter Teglberg Madsen5.   

Abstract

Toothed whales produce echolocation clicks with source parameters related to body size; however, it may be equally important to consider the influence of habitat, as suggested by studies on echolocating bats. A few toothed whale species have fully adapted to river systems, where sonar operation is likely to result in higher clutter and reverberation levels than those experienced by most toothed whales at sea because of the shallow water and dense vegetation. To test the hypothesis that habitat shapes the evolution of toothed whale biosonar parameters by promoting simpler auditory scenes to interpret in acoustically complex habitats, echolocation clicks of wild Amazon river dolphins were recorded using a vertical seven-hydrophone array. We identified 404 on-axis biosonar clicks having a mean SLpp of 190.3 ± 6.1 dB re. 1 µPa, mean SLEFD of 132.1 ± 6.0 dB re. 1 µPa(2)s, mean Fc of 101.2 ± 10.5 kHz, mean BWRMS of 29.3 ± 4.3 kHz and mean ICI of 35.1 ± 17.9 ms. Piston fit modelling resulted in an estimated half-power beamwidth of 10.2 deg (95% CI: 9.6-10.5 deg) and directivity index of 25.2 dB (95% CI: 24.9-25.7 dB). These results support the hypothesis that river-dwelling toothed whales operate their biosonars at lower amplitude and higher sampling rates than similar-sized marine species without sacrificing high directivity, in order to provide high update rates in acoustically complex habitats and simplify auditory scenes through reduced clutter and reverberation levels. We conclude that habitat, along with body size, is an important evolutionary driver of source parameters in toothed whale biosonars.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beamwidth; Clutter; Directionality; Echolocation; Habitat; Toothed whale

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26447198     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.120501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Information-seeking across auditory scenes by an echolocating dolphin.

Authors:  Heidi E Harley; Wendi Fellner; Candice Frances; Amber Thomas; Barbara Losch; Katherine Newton; David Feuerbach
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.899

2.  The echolocation transmission beam of free-ranging Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis).

Authors:  Liang Fang; Yuping Wu; Kexiong Wang; Matthew K Pine; Ding Wang; Songhai Li
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Highly Directional Sonar Beam of Narwhals (Monodon monoceros) Measured with a Vertical 16 Hydrophone Array.

Authors:  Jens C Koblitz; Peter Stilz; Marianne H Rasmussen; Kristin L Laidre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Wonky whales: the evolution of cranial asymmetry in cetaceans.

Authors:  Ellen J Coombs; Julien Clavel; Travis Park; Morgan Churchill; Anjali Goswami
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 7.431

5.  Automated classification of dolphin echolocation click types from the Gulf of Mexico.

Authors:  Kaitlin E Frasier; Marie A Roch; Melissa S Soldevilla; Sean M Wiggins; Lance P Garrison; John A Hildebrand
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Comparison of methods for rhythm analysis of complex animals' acoustic signals.

Authors:  Lara S Burchardt; Mirjam Knörnschild
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.