Literature DB >> 2644718

A clinical evaluation of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

W M Kang1, C H Lee, Y H Chou, H J Lin, H C Lo, S C Hu, F K P'eng.   

Abstract

Recently ultrasonography (US) has proven effective in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. However, the impact of US on surgical decision-making in clinical practice remains unclear. From August 1986 to July 1987, 62 patients with clinical signs of acute appendicitis received US examinations after initial clinical evaluations. According to clinical pictures, they were classified into two groups: group I, clinically typical (Alvarado's score greater than or equal to 7) and group II, clinically dubious (Alvarado's score less than or equal to 6) cases. All group I patients (n = 34) had surgery. Group II patients (n = 28) received close in-hospital observation on an every 4-hour basis for less than 24 hours. However, surgery was performed if Alvarado's score increased up to or above 7 or surgical indications became evident during observation. The pathologic reports and operative findings were retrospectively correlated with the US diagnosis. For group I patients, clinical examination without knowledge of US findings was correct in 30 (88.9%) cases, 26 (86.7%) of which were detected by US. Four (50%) of eight patients with negative US findings had acute appendicitis. In group II, 12 of 15 patients who had surgery had acute appendicitis, and 10 (83.3%) were detected by US. Two (11%) of 18 patients with negative US findings were finally proved to have acute appendicitis. The average duration from initial clinical examination to surgical decision fpr patients with acute appendicitis was 6.8 hours. There were no false-positives in either group. For patients with typical clinical presentation, US is not superior to clinical examination, and surgery is recommended even if US findings are negative.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2644718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  9 in total

Review 1.  Gastroenterology.

Authors:  L J O'Donnell; E M Alstead; M J Farthing
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Strategies for reducing inappropriate laparotomy rate in the acute abdomen.

Authors:  S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-02

3.  Negative appendectomy experience in children.

Authors:  R Karabulut; K Sonmez; Z Turkyilmaz; B Demirogullari; I O Ozen; A Demirtola; A C Basaklar; N Kale
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Ultrasonography in the management of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  P Rossi; P Covarelli; F Mosci; R Bisacci; B Sensi; L Moggi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The diagnostic challenge of postoperative acute appendicitis.

Authors:  D Barr; J A van Heerden; P Mucha
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Ultrasound scanning of the acute abdomen by surgeons in training.

Authors:  R J Williams; A C Windsor; R D Rosin; D V Mann; M Crofton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Appendicitis diagnosis today: clinical and ultrasonic deductions.

Authors:  H John; U Neff; M Kelemen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Combined use of modified Alvarado score and USG in decreasing negative appendicectomy rate.

Authors:  Hemant Nautiyal; Shabi Ahmad; N K Keshwani; D N Awasthi
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 9.  The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert Ohle; Fran O'Reilly; Kirsty K O'Brien; Tom Fahey; Borislav D Dimitrov
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 8.775

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.