| Literature DB >> 2644718 |
W M Kang1, C H Lee, Y H Chou, H J Lin, H C Lo, S C Hu, F K P'eng.
Abstract
Recently ultrasonography (US) has proven effective in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. However, the impact of US on surgical decision-making in clinical practice remains unclear. From August 1986 to July 1987, 62 patients with clinical signs of acute appendicitis received US examinations after initial clinical evaluations. According to clinical pictures, they were classified into two groups: group I, clinically typical (Alvarado's score greater than or equal to 7) and group II, clinically dubious (Alvarado's score less than or equal to 6) cases. All group I patients (n = 34) had surgery. Group II patients (n = 28) received close in-hospital observation on an every 4-hour basis for less than 24 hours. However, surgery was performed if Alvarado's score increased up to or above 7 or surgical indications became evident during observation. The pathologic reports and operative findings were retrospectively correlated with the US diagnosis. For group I patients, clinical examination without knowledge of US findings was correct in 30 (88.9%) cases, 26 (86.7%) of which were detected by US. Four (50%) of eight patients with negative US findings had acute appendicitis. In group II, 12 of 15 patients who had surgery had acute appendicitis, and 10 (83.3%) were detected by US. Two (11%) of 18 patients with negative US findings were finally proved to have acute appendicitis. The average duration from initial clinical examination to surgical decision fpr patients with acute appendicitis was 6.8 hours. There were no false-positives in either group. For patients with typical clinical presentation, US is not superior to clinical examination, and surgery is recommended even if US findings are negative.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1989 PMID: 2644718
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surgery ISSN: 0039-6060 Impact factor: 3.982