Literature DB >> 26446732

Comparison of interpolation methods for the estimation of groundwater contamination in Andimeshk-Shush Plain, Southwest of Iran.

Rouhollah Mirzaei1, Mohamad Sakizadeh2.   

Abstract

Selection of appropriate interpolation methods for the conversion of discrete samples into continuous maps is a controversial issue in the environmental researches. The main objective of this study was to analyze the suitability of three interpolation methods for the discrimination of groundwater with respect to the water quality index (WQI). The groundwater quality data consisted of 17 variables associated with 65 wells located in Andimeshk-Shush Plain. Three spatial interpolation methods including ordinary kriging (OK), empirical Bayesian kriging (EBK), and inverse distance weighting (IDW) were utilized for modeling the groundwater contamination. In addition, different cross-validation indicators were applied to assess the performance of different interpolation methods. The results showed that the performance differed slightly among different methods, although the best performed interpolation method in this study was the empirical Bayesian kriging. Among the interpolation methods, IDW with weighting power of 4 estimated the most contaminated area, while OK estimated the lowest contaminated area. The weighting power of IDW had a significant influence on the estimation, meaning that the estimated contaminated area was increased when a greater weighting power was selected. The subtraction results indicated that there are slightly spatial differences among the contamination assessment results. Results of both standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) also showed that uncertainty was highest in the southern part of the study area, where the distribution of wells were more intensive than that of the northern part.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Bayesian kriging; Groundwater contamination; Inverse distance weighting; Iran; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26446732     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5507-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for the estimation of air quality data.

Authors:  David W Wong; Lester Yuan; Susan A Perlin
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2004-09

2.  Spatial distribution of soil heavy metal pollution estimated by different interpolation methods: accuracy and uncertainty analysis.

Authors:  Yunfeng Xie; Tong-bin Chen; Mei Lei; Jun Yang; Qing-jun Guo; Bo Song; Xiao-yong Zhou
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Groundwater quality mapping in urban groundwater using GIS.

Authors:  Bilgehan Nas; Ali Berktay
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Application of validation data for assessing spatial interpolation methods for 8-h ozone or other sparsely monitored constituents.

Authors:  John Joseph; Hatim O Sharif; Thankam Sunil; Hasanat Alamgir
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Uncertainty of SWAT model at different DEM resolutions in a large mountainous watershed.

Authors:  Peipei Zhang; Ruimin Liu; Yimeng Bao; Jiawei Wang; Wenwen Yu; Zhenyao Shen
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Uncertainty analysis of total phosphorus spatial-temporal variations in the Yangtze River Estuary using different interpolation methods.

Authors:  Ruimin Liu; Yaxin Chen; Chengchun Sun; Peipei Zhang; Jiawei Wang; Wenwen Yu; Zhenyao Shen
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 5.553

7.  Comparison of the accuracy of kriging and IDW interpolations in estimating groundwater arsenic concentrations in Texas.

Authors:  Gordon Gong; Sravan Mattevada; Sid E O'Bryant
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Evaluation of arsenic contamination potential using indicator kriging in the Yun-Lin aquifer (Taiwan).

Authors:  Chen-Wuing Liu; Cheng-Shin Jang; Chung-Min Liao
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2004-04-05       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Evaluation of potential health risk of arsenic-affected groundwater using indicator kriging and dose response model.

Authors:  Jin-Jing Lee; Cheng-Shin Jang; Sheng-Wei Wang; Chen-Wuing Liu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 7.963

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Spatial interpolation methods and geostatistics for mapping groundwater contamination in a coastal area.

Authors:  Vetrimurugan Elumalai; K Brindha; Bongani Sithole; Elango Lakshmanan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Comparison of four methods for spatial interpolation of estimated atmospheric nitrogen deposition in South China.

Authors:  Linglu Qu; Huayun Xiao; Nengjian Zheng; Zhongyi Zhang; Yu Xu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Seawater intrusion and submarine groundwater discharge along the Indian coast.

Authors:  Vengadesan Manivannan; Lakshmanan Elango
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Risk Assessment of Metals in Urban Soils from a Typical Industrial City, Suzhou, Eastern China.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Hou-Qi Liu; Yu Gong; Yang Wei; Ai-Jun Miao; Liu-Yan Yang; Huan Zhong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.