Literature DB >> 26446694

Somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in Merkel cell carcinoma.

M Sollini1, S Taralli2, M Milella3, P A Erba4, S Rubagotti1, A Fraternali1, M Roncali1, E Moscarella5, G Perotti2, V Rufini2, A Versari1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an uncommon aggressive primary cutaneous carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation. However, literature data about the use of somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in MCC are limited and its role is not clearly stated.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of PET/CT using somatostatin analogues radiolabelled with gallium-68 in patients with MCC.
METHODS: All patients affected by MCC who performed a somatostatin receptor PET/CT imaging from October 2007 to May 2014 were retrospectively analysed. The diagnostic performances of PET/CT were evaluated on a patient-based analysis and compared to final diagnosis (histology = 3 or clinical/radiological follow-up = 20).
RESULTS: We evaluated 23 consecutive MCC patients [18 men; median age 71 years (range 47-87)]. Primary tumour was located in ear (1/23), cheek (3/23), arm (2/23), hand (1/23), back (1/23), anal canal (1/23), gluteus (4/23), thigh (3/23) and popliteal fossa (1/23). In 6/23 patients, the site of primary tumour was unknown. PET/CT was performed to detect primary tumour site (4/23) or to stage (8/23) or re-stage (11/23) patients. PET/CT resulted positive in 14/23 patients and according to the final diagnosis was defined true positive, true negative, false positive (FP) and false negative in 11/23, 8/23, 3/23 and 1/23 cases respectively. FP PET/CT results were due to unspecific liver uptake, post-surgical inflammation and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour. PET/CT was unable to detect primary tumour site in all patients with unknown primary MCC. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT were 92%, 73% and 83% respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, somatostatin receptor PET/CT imaging resulted useful in patients with MCC and presented high diagnostic performances with a significant impact in disease management although in patients with unknown primary MCC, it was unable to identify the primary tumour site.
© 2015 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26446694     DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   6.166


  3 in total

1.  Merkel Cell Carcinoma, Version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Christopher K Bichakjian; Thomas Olencki; Sumaira Z Aasi; Murad Alam; James S Andersen; Rachel Blitzblau; Glen M Bowen; Carlo M Contreras; Gregory A Daniels; Roy Decker; Jeffrey M Farma; Kris Fisher; Brian Gastman; Karthik Ghosh; Roy C Grekin; Kenneth Grossman; Alan L Ho; Karl D Lewis; Manisha Loss; Daniel D Lydiatt; Jane Messina; Kishwer S Nehal; Paul Nghiem; Igor Puzanov; Chrysalyne D Schmults; Ashok R Shaha; Valencia Thomas; Yaohui G Xu; John A Zic; Karin G Hoffmann; Anita M Engh
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 12.693

Review 2.  Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Recommendations for Diagnostics and Treatment.

Authors:  Urs Dietmar Achim Müller-Richter; Anja Gesierich; Alexander Christian Kübler; Stefan Hartmann; Roman Camillus Brands
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  18F-FDG and 68Ga-somatostatin analogs PET/CT in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: a comparison study.

Authors:  Silvia Taralli; Martina Sollini; Michele Milella; Germano Perotti; Angelina Filice; Massimo Menga; Annibale Versari; Vittoria Rufini
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.138

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.