Literature DB >> 26446011

Communication Between Breast Cancer Patients Who Received Inconclusive Genetic Test Results and Their Daughters and Sisters Years After Testing.

Jessica E Baars1,2, Margreet G E M Ausems1, Els van Riel1, Marijke C Kars3, Eveline M A Bleiker4,5.   

Abstract

Inconclusive genetic test results including screening recommendations for the breast cancer patients and their first-degree relatives are the most common outcomes of BRCA 1/2 testing. Patients themselves should communicate these results to their relatives. Our aim was to explore communication of breast cancer genetic counseling results with daughters and sisters over a long period of time. Breast cancer patients, who had received an inconclusive DNA test result 7-14 years earlier, completed a self-report questionnaire. Additionally, in-depth interviews were conducted and analysed thematically. Of the 93 respondents, 85 (91 %) considered themselves responsible for communicating genetic test results to relatives. In-depth interviews (n = 14) showed, that counselees wanted 'to hand over' their responsibilities to communicate the test results and screening recommendations to their sisters. Although most patients had informed their daughters and sisters about the genetic test results, usually little is spoken about genetic test results and screening recommendations once the duty of informing is completed. We recommend that, similar to the procedure for BRCA1/2-mutation carriers, a separate letter for first-degree relatives of patients with an inconclusive test result should be provided. In this way information about risks and screening recommendations can be verified by family members years after genetic testing has been completed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Communication; Family; Genetic counseling; Genetic testing; Inconclusive test result; Long term

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26446011     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9889-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  33 in total

Review 1.  Communicating genetic risk information within families: a review.

Authors:  Mel Wiseman; Caroline Dancyger; Susan Michie
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Christian F Singer; D Gareth Evans; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Ellen Matloff; Rosalind Eeles; Gabriella Pichert; Laura Van t'veer; Nadine Tung; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Wendy S Rubinstein; Patricia A Ganz; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gail Tomlinson; Joellen Schildkraut; Joanne L Blum; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Withdrawal from genetic counselling for cancer.

Authors:  Eveline Bleiker; Gea Wigbout; Anja van Rens; Senno Verhoef; Laura Van't Veer; Neil Aaronson
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.857

4.  Learning of your parent's BRCA mutation during adolescence or early adulthood: a study of offspring experiences.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Kimberly Pawlowski; Comfort N Ibe; Shelly A Cummings; Fay Hlubocky; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Christopher K Daugherty
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  An investigation of the disclosure process and support needs of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers.

Authors:  Jordana Segal; Mary Jane Esplen; Brenda Toner; Sylvia Baedorf; Steven Narod; Kate Butler
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 6.  Ethical and juridical issues of genetic testing: a review of the international regulation.

Authors:  Pilar Nicolás
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 6.312

7.  Factors determining dissemination of results and uptake of genetic testing in families with known BRCA1/2 mutations.

Authors:  Esme Finlay; Jill E Stopfer; Eric Burlingame; Katherine Goldfeder Evans; Katherine L Nathanson; Barbara L Weber; Katrina Armstrong; Timothy R Rebbeck; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2008-03

Review 8.  Guidelines for disclosing genetic information to family members: from development to use.

Authors:  Béatrice Godard; Thierry Hurlimann; Martin Letendre; Nathalie Egalité
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Active approach for breast cancer genetic counseling during radiotherapy: long-term psychosocial and medical impact.

Authors:  J E Baars; E M A Bleiker; E van Riel; C C Rodenhuis; M E Velthuizen; K J Schlich; M G E M Ausems
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.438

10.  Informing relatives about their hereditary or familial cancer risk: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eveline de Geus; Cora M Aalfs; Mathilde G E Verdam; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  4 in total

1.  Female family members lack understanding of indeterminate negative BRCA1/2 test results shared by probands.

Authors:  Deborah O Himes; Deborah K Gibbons; Wendy C Birmingham; Renea L Beckstrand; Amanda Gammon; Anita Y Kinney; Margaret F Clayton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Exploring relatives' perceptions of participation, ethics, and communication in a patient-driven study for hereditary cancer variant reclassification.

Authors:  Ginger J Tsai; Annie T Chen; Lauren T Garrett; Wylie Burke; Deborah J Bowen; Brian H Shirts
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Limitations and Pitfalls of Using Family Letters to Communicate Genetic Risk: a Qualitative Study with Patients and Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Sandi Dheensa; Anneke Lucassen; Angela Fenwick
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  German and Italian Users of Web-Accessed Genetic Data: Attitudes on Personal Utility and Personal Sharing Preferences. Results of a Comparative Survey (n=192).

Authors:  Sabine Wöhlke; Manuel Schaper; Serena Oliveri; Ilaria Cutica; Francesca Spinella; Gabriella Pravettoni; Daniela Steinberger; Silke Schicktanz
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.599

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.