Literature DB >> 26445821

Electrophysiological findings following pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency catheter guided by contact-force and second-generation cryoballoon: lessons from repeat ablation procedures.

Giuseppe Ciconte1, Vedran Velagić2, Giacomo Mugnai2, Yukio Saitoh2, Ghazala Irfan2, Burak Hunuk2, Erwin Ströker2, Giulio Conte2, Juan Sieira2, Giacomo Di Giovanni2, Giannis Baltogiannis2, Pedro Brugada2, Carlo de Asmundis2, Gian-Battista Chierchia2.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the incidence of late pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection following index PV isolation (PVI) procedure initially achieved with radiofrequency contact-force catheter ablation (CFCA) and second-generation cryoballoon ablation (CB-AdvA). METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 56 consecutive patients (41 male, 73.2%; mean age 60.8 ± 11.8 years) underwent a repeat ablation because of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATas) after index PVI achieved with CFCA (30 patients) or CB-AdvA (26 patients). All repeat procedures were performed by the means of CFCA. In the CFCA group, among 119 PVs, 43 (36.1%) showed conduction gaps in 24 patients (1.8 per patient), whereas in the CB-AdvA group among 103 veins, 21 (20.4%) showed a PV reconnection in 18 patients (1.2 per patient) (P = 0.01). The left superior pulmonary vein was less frequently reconnected following CB-AdvA when compared with CFCA (2/25, 8% vs. 11/29, 37.9%; P = 0.01). In the CFCA group, the mean CF per-vein was lower in reconnecting veins when compared with those persistently isolated (10.9 ± 2.7 vs. 18.6 ± 3.1 g; P < 0.001). In the CB-AdvA group, late PV reconnection was associated with warmer nadir temperature (-48.9 ± 5.1 vs. -51.2 ± 4.7°C; P = 0.05) and longer time-to-isolation (71.1 ± 20.2 vs. 50.2 ± 32.9 s; P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: The rate of late PV reconnection is significantly lower following CB-AdvA when compared with CFCA as index procedure. Lower CF values and warmer nadir temperature with longer time to effect were more frequently associated with PV reconnections in the setting of CFCA and CB-AdvA. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Contact-force radiofrequency catheter ablation; Cryoballoon ablation; Pulmonary vein isolation; Pulmonary vein reconnection; Second-generation cryoballoon

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26445821     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  13 in total

1.  Repeat procedures using the second-generation cryoballoon for recurrence of atrial fibrillation after initial ablation with conventional radiofrequency.

Authors:  Valentina De Regibus; Saverio Iacopino; Juan-Pablo Abugattas; Giacomo Mugnai; Darragh Moran; Erwin Ströker; Hugo-Enrique Coutino; Ken Takarada; Rajin Choudhury; Gaetano Paparella; Vincent Umbrain; Pedro Brugada; Carlo de Asmundis; Gian-Battista Chierchia
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Earliest pulmonary vein potential-guided cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Mizutani; Masaaki Kanashiro; Yuichiro Makino; Akinori Satake; Wataru Suzuki; Masanari Kurobe; Kouji Mizutani; Hitoshi Ichimiya; Yasuhiro Uchida; Junji Watanabe; Satoshi Ichimiya; Yasuya Inden; Toyoaki Murohara
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Pulmonary vein reconnection following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using the second-generation cryoballoon versus open-irrigated radiofrequency: results of a multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Arash Aryana; Sheldon M Singh; Giacomo Mugnai; Carlo de Asmundis; Marcin Kowalski; Deep K Pujara; Andrew I Cohen; Steve K Singh; Charles E Fuenzalida; Nelson Prager; Mark R Bowers; Padraig Gearoid O'Neill; Pedro Brugada; André d'Avila; Gian-Battista Chierchia
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Evolution of Force Sensing Technologies.

Authors:  Dipen Shah
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2017-06

5.  Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurrence after redo procedure-ablation modality impact.

Authors:  Ivan Zeljkovic; Sven Knecht; Florian Spies; Tobias Reichlin; Stefan Osswald; Michael Kühne; Christian Sticherling
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Increased rate of observed real-time pulmonary vein isolation with third-generation short-tip cryoballoon.

Authors:  Alexander Pott; Kerstin Petscher; Marvin Messemer; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Tillman Dahme
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Comparative efficacy and safety of contact force-sensing catheter and second-generation cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  X Zhou; W Lv; W Zhang; Y Ye; Y Li; Q Zhou; J Zhang; Q Xing; Y Lu; L Zhang; H Wang; W Qin; B Tang
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.590

8.  The Impact of Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation on Healthcare Utilization and Costs: An Economic Analysis From the FIRE AND ICE Trial.

Authors:  K R Julian Chun; Josep Brugada; Arif Elvan; Laszlo Gellér; Matthias Busch; Alberto Barrera; Richard J Schilling; Matthew R Reynolds; Robert B Hokanson; Reece Holbrook; Benedict Brown; Michael Schlüter; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Real-world safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with contact force or cryoballoon ablation.

Authors:  Andrea Natale; Sanghamitra Mohanty; Laura Goldstein; Tara Gomez; Tina D Hunter
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Two-Year Follow-Up after Contact Force Sensing Radiofrequency Catheter and Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Comparative Single Centre Study.

Authors:  Attila Kardos; Zsuzsanna Kis; Zoltan Som; Zsofia Nagy; Csaba Foldesi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-05-22       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.