| Literature DB >> 26445660 |
Timothy Y James1, L Felipe Toledo2, Dennis Rödder3, Domingos da Silva Leite4, Anat M Belasen1, Clarisse M Betancourt-Román1, Thomas S Jenkinson1, Claudio Soto-Azat5, Carolina Lambertini2, Ana V Longo6, Joice Ruggeri7, James P Collins8, Patricia A Burrowes9, Karen R Lips10, Kelly R Zamudio6, Joyce E Longcore11.
Abstract
The amphibian fungal disease chytridiomycosis, which affects species across all continents, recently emerged as one of the greatest threats to biodiversity. Yet, many aspects of the basic biology and epidemiology of the pathogen, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), are still unknown, such as when and from where did Bd emerge and what is its true ecological niche? Here, we review the ecology and evolution of Bd in the Americas and highlight controversies that make this disease so enigmatic. We explore factors associated with variance in severity of epizootics focusing on the disease triangle of host susceptibility, pathogen virulence, and environment. Reevaluating the causes of the panzootic is timely given the wealth of data on Bd prevalence across hosts and communities and the recent discoveries suggesting co-evolutionary potential of hosts and Bd. We generate a new species distribution model for Bd in the Americas based on over 30,000 records and suggest a novel future research agenda. Instead of focusing on pathogen "hot spots," we need to identify pathogen "cold spots" so that we can better understand what limits the pathogen's distribution. Finally, we introduce the concept of "the Ghost of Epizootics Past" to discuss expected patterns in postepizootic host communities.Entities:
Keywords: Amphibian; Emerging infectious disease; chytrid; fungi; immunogenetics; species distribution model; virulence
Year: 2015 PMID: 26445660 PMCID: PMC4588650 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1672
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis develops by either of two pathways, depending on whether growth is on nutrient agar (A–E; Longcore et al. 1999) or inside of amphibian cells (A, F, I; Greenspan et al. 2012). On agar, the zoospore (A) encysts and forms anucleate rhizoids. Over the course of 4 days (A–D), the zoospore cyst matures into a zoosporangium that releases zoospores through discharge papillae (E). Colonial thalli divided by septae (arrow) occur occasionally (B′), and their presence has been used to confirm the identity of B. dendrobatidis. On skin, the zoospore encysts on the surface of a cell (F), and forms a germ tube (arrow), which grows through one or more host cell layers (G). The zoosporangium with sparse rhizoids forms from a swelling of the germ tube (G, H). By the time zoospores are released, the outer skin layer (arrow) has sloughed (I).
Figure 2Positive records of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and potential distribution of the fungus according to an ensemble species distribution model. Warmer colors indicate higher probability of environmental suitability. Areas exceeding the environmental training range of the SDM are indicated in gray.
Figure 3Prevalence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and potential distribution of the fungus according to an ensemble species distribution model. Warmer colors indicate higher probability of environmental suitability. Prevalence was computed only for those grid cells with more than 10 samples, wherein the size of the circles represent sample size. Areas exceeding the environmental training range of the SDM are indicated in gray.
Figure 4Distribution of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis genotypes determined from multilocus sequence typing of cultured isolates. Bd clades are identified by color, and the captive status of the host amphibians is indicated by shape. The area of each shape represents the sample size of genotypes from each locality. Notable samples include the following: a captive an isolate of Bd‐GPL‐2 from Xenopus laevis imported to U.C. Berkeley, California (1), an isolate of a novel Bd‐Brazil strain from Lithobates catesbeianus in a Michigan market (2), captive isolates of GPL‐2 from the National Zoo, Washington, D.C. (3), and the Bronx Zoo and markets in New York City (4), and a region of high genetic heterogeneity in the Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil (5). Isolates are considered GPL‐1 if they are heterozygous or homozygous for diagnostic alleles at loci BdC24, R6046, or both. Data are compiled from published sources (Morgan et al. 2007; James et al. 2009; Schloegel et al. 2012; Velo‐Anton et al. 2012) and unpublished data.